Characterising and identifying gaps in sustainability assessments of tourism - a review
Research output: Journal contributions › Scientific review articles › Research
Standard
In: Tourism Management Perspectives, Vol. 43, 101004, 01.07.2022.
Research output: Journal contributions › Scientific review articles › Research
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Characterising and identifying gaps in sustainability assessments of tourism - a review
AU - Balas, Martin
AU - Abson, David J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2022/7/1
Y1 - 2022/7/1
N2 - This paper highlights the main stages in developing a process of sustainability assessments in tourism (SAT) and applies a systematic literature review of empirical research based on pre-developed assessment categories. The aim is to characterise general approaches to measuring sustainability in tourism and to identify patterns and research gaps within these approaches. Four major assessment methodologies were identified through a hierarchical cluster analysis. Whereas new frameworks and indices explore new conceptual approaches to sustainability assessments, case studies and systems approaches rely on existing indicator work and create new assessment contexts. The literature review confirms the heterogeneity of these assessments, albeit without an overall sector-specific consensus. The results show that stakeholder involvement is not widely implemented in the indicator-selection process, and indicators are not linked to sustainability targets. The findings demonstrate that more effort is needed in relation to contextualising frameworks and assessment approaches, to foster target-oriented decision-making.
AB - This paper highlights the main stages in developing a process of sustainability assessments in tourism (SAT) and applies a systematic literature review of empirical research based on pre-developed assessment categories. The aim is to characterise general approaches to measuring sustainability in tourism and to identify patterns and research gaps within these approaches. Four major assessment methodologies were identified through a hierarchical cluster analysis. Whereas new frameworks and indices explore new conceptual approaches to sustainability assessments, case studies and systems approaches rely on existing indicator work and create new assessment contexts. The literature review confirms the heterogeneity of these assessments, albeit without an overall sector-specific consensus. The results show that stakeholder involvement is not widely implemented in the indicator-selection process, and indicators are not linked to sustainability targets. The findings demonstrate that more effort is needed in relation to contextualising frameworks and assessment approaches, to foster target-oriented decision-making.
KW - Sustainability Governance
KW - Sustainable tourism assessments
KW - Sustainability sciences, Communication
KW - impact
KW - indicators
KW - monitoring
KW - Tourism studies
KW - sustainable develeopment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85136498281&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/06c2f345-d7b2-351e-93ae-2547cca4091d/
U2 - 10.1016/j.tmp.2022.101004
DO - 10.1016/j.tmp.2022.101004
M3 - Scientific review articles
VL - 43
JO - Tourism Management Perspectives
JF - Tourism Management Perspectives
SN - 2211-9736
M1 - 101004
ER -