‘Being affected’: The epistemic value of vulnerability in fieldwork
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Qualitative Research, 2025.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - ‘Being affected’
T2 - The epistemic value of vulnerability in fieldwork
AU - Minatti, Wolfgang
AU - Gass-Quintero, Frédéric Guillaume
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2025.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - As ethics of fieldwork gain prominence, discussions in qualitative methods have increasingly focused on the relationship between vulnerability and fieldwork practices. Existing literature provides ethical prescriptions and safety recommendations for fieldworkers in ‘dangerous places’. However, it falls short of addressing the analytic stakes created by experiences of vulnerability in the field. This is problematic because it limits the fieldworker's reflexivity, preventing them from examining unsettling situations as relevant data. To address this, the article builds on an understanding of vulnerability as a type of situation. We argue that fieldworkers gain an analytic advantage by reflecting on experiences shaped by situations of vulnerability, offering insights into the social context under investigation and the researcher's position in it. The article demonstrates the epistemic value of vulnerability by drawing on fieldwork on the Colombian conflict and peace process.
AB - As ethics of fieldwork gain prominence, discussions in qualitative methods have increasingly focused on the relationship between vulnerability and fieldwork practices. Existing literature provides ethical prescriptions and safety recommendations for fieldworkers in ‘dangerous places’. However, it falls short of addressing the analytic stakes created by experiences of vulnerability in the field. This is problematic because it limits the fieldworker's reflexivity, preventing them from examining unsettling situations as relevant data. To address this, the article builds on an understanding of vulnerability as a type of situation. We argue that fieldworkers gain an analytic advantage by reflecting on experiences shaped by situations of vulnerability, offering insights into the social context under investigation and the researcher's position in it. The article demonstrates the epistemic value of vulnerability by drawing on fieldwork on the Colombian conflict and peace process.
KW - Colombia
KW - epistemic value
KW - ethics
KW - ethnography
KW - fieldwork
KW - methodology
KW - qualitative research
KW - reflexivity
KW - safety
KW - Vulnerability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85217169769&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/14687941241308712
DO - 10.1177/14687941241308712
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:85217169769
JO - Qualitative Research
JF - Qualitative Research
SN - 1468-7941
ER -