Becoming prosumer: Revealing trading preferences and decision-making strategies in peer-to-peer energy communities

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Becoming prosumer: Revealing trading preferences and decision-making strategies in peer-to-peer energy communities. / Hahnel, Ulf J.J.; Herberz, Mario; Pena-Bello, Alejandro et al.
In: Energy Policy, Vol. 137, 111098, 01.02.2020.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Hahnel UJJ, Herberz M, Pena-Bello A, Parra D, Brosch T. Becoming prosumer: Revealing trading preferences and decision-making strategies in peer-to-peer energy communities. Energy Policy. 2020 Feb 1;137:111098. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111098

Bibtex

@article{a9df43acd59a4404b2c12e4a57e5a754,
title = "Becoming prosumer: Revealing trading preferences and decision-making strategies in peer-to-peer energy communities",
abstract = "Increasing distributed renewable energy generation renders balancing of energy supply and demand more challenging. Peer-to-peer (P2P) exchange of decentrally generated energy is a promising means to optimize renewable energy flows. While previous research has primarily focused on the technological and economic benefits of P2P energy trading, little research has investigated customer preferences in this context so far. It is thus still unclear to what extent private actors such as homeowners are actually willing to participate in P2P energy communities and if so, under which conditions. Here, we address this research gap by analyzing homeowners' trading decisions in simulated P2P electricity trading scenarios. Findings based on a sample of 301 German homeowners show that community electricity prices and state of charge of private energy storages are key determinants of homeowners{\textquoteright} trading behavior. We moreover identified four target groups that systematically differed in their decision-making strategies ranging from price-focused prosumers (38.9%) to classic non-trading consumers (22.6%). Our findings provide promising insights for the design of P2P communities and allow policy makers to more accurately predict risks and benefits associated with P2P projects. Finally, our findings contribute to the development of tailored policy instruments aiming to increase P2P trading in decentralized energy communities.",
keywords = "Decentralized energy systems, Decision-making, Energy communities, Energy storage systems, Energy trading, Microgrids, Peer-to-peer, Psychology, Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics",
author = "Hahnel, {Ulf J.J.} and Mario Herberz and Alejandro Pena-Bello and David Parra and Tobias Brosch",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019 Elsevier Ltd",
year = "2020",
month = feb,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111098",
language = "English",
volume = "137",
journal = "Energy Policy",
issn = "0301-4215",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Becoming prosumer

T2 - Revealing trading preferences and decision-making strategies in peer-to-peer energy communities

AU - Hahnel, Ulf J.J.

AU - Herberz, Mario

AU - Pena-Bello, Alejandro

AU - Parra, David

AU - Brosch, Tobias

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2019 Elsevier Ltd

PY - 2020/2/1

Y1 - 2020/2/1

N2 - Increasing distributed renewable energy generation renders balancing of energy supply and demand more challenging. Peer-to-peer (P2P) exchange of decentrally generated energy is a promising means to optimize renewable energy flows. While previous research has primarily focused on the technological and economic benefits of P2P energy trading, little research has investigated customer preferences in this context so far. It is thus still unclear to what extent private actors such as homeowners are actually willing to participate in P2P energy communities and if so, under which conditions. Here, we address this research gap by analyzing homeowners' trading decisions in simulated P2P electricity trading scenarios. Findings based on a sample of 301 German homeowners show that community electricity prices and state of charge of private energy storages are key determinants of homeowners’ trading behavior. We moreover identified four target groups that systematically differed in their decision-making strategies ranging from price-focused prosumers (38.9%) to classic non-trading consumers (22.6%). Our findings provide promising insights for the design of P2P communities and allow policy makers to more accurately predict risks and benefits associated with P2P projects. Finally, our findings contribute to the development of tailored policy instruments aiming to increase P2P trading in decentralized energy communities.

AB - Increasing distributed renewable energy generation renders balancing of energy supply and demand more challenging. Peer-to-peer (P2P) exchange of decentrally generated energy is a promising means to optimize renewable energy flows. While previous research has primarily focused on the technological and economic benefits of P2P energy trading, little research has investigated customer preferences in this context so far. It is thus still unclear to what extent private actors such as homeowners are actually willing to participate in P2P energy communities and if so, under which conditions. Here, we address this research gap by analyzing homeowners' trading decisions in simulated P2P electricity trading scenarios. Findings based on a sample of 301 German homeowners show that community electricity prices and state of charge of private energy storages are key determinants of homeowners’ trading behavior. We moreover identified four target groups that systematically differed in their decision-making strategies ranging from price-focused prosumers (38.9%) to classic non-trading consumers (22.6%). Our findings provide promising insights for the design of P2P communities and allow policy makers to more accurately predict risks and benefits associated with P2P projects. Finally, our findings contribute to the development of tailored policy instruments aiming to increase P2P trading in decentralized energy communities.

KW - Decentralized energy systems

KW - Decision-making

KW - Energy communities

KW - Energy storage systems

KW - Energy trading

KW - Microgrids

KW - Peer-to-peer

KW - Psychology

KW - Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075352866&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111098

DO - 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111098

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85075352866

VL - 137

JO - Energy Policy

JF - Energy Policy

SN - 0301-4215

M1 - 111098

ER -

Recently viewed

Researchers

  1. Frank Schmielewski

Publications

  1. DESI
  2. Regensburger Schauspiele
  3. Karl Jaspers:Die Schuldfrage
  4. Das aufmerksamkeitsgestörte und hyperaktive Kind
  5. Franz Hessel: Sämtliche Werke in fünf Bänden
  6. Sprachgebräuche jenseits des Sprechens
  7. Grundbegriffe des Strafrechts
  8. Handbuch Grounded Theory
  9. Realigning the land-sharing/land-sparing debate to match conservation needs
  10. Sauberkeit ist messbar
  11. Heterogene Argumentationen zur Legitimierung der Didaktik des Sachunterrichts
  12. RiB-Kit (RFID-in-a-Box)
  13. Bildungsgang Realschule
  14. Die Wissenschaftsinitiative „Management und unternehmerisches Handeln"
  15. Die Hälfte des Himmels, nicht die Hälfte des Mülls
  16. The ground beetle supertribe zuphiitae in the southern levant
  17. Transdiagnostic tailored internet- and mobile-based guided treatment for major depressive disorder and comorbid anxiety
  18. § 37 Außenwirtschaftsstrafrecht
  19. Spontaneität und Begegnung
  20. A unique nest-protection strategy in a new species of spider wasp
  21. Die Deutsche Nachhaltigkeitsstrategie
  22. Trade union membership in eastern and western Germany
  23. Transdisziplinäre Entwicklungsteams
  24. The regulation of zero-price markets by the competition authorities in the USA and the EU
  25. Perspectives on German Popular Music
  26. Sustainable business models and sustainable supply chain management
  27. Lives versus Livelihoods? Perceived economic risk has a stronger association with support for COVID-19 preventive measures than perceived health risk
  28. Besessenheit und Ansteckung
  29. Exposure of the Irish population to PBDEs in food
  30. Lieferzeitbestimmung in der auftragsbezogenen Werkstattfertigung mittels maschinellen Lernens
  31. Social Contexts in Team Formation:
  32. Auf die Temperatur kommt es an!
  33. Medienerziehung in Kindertagesstätten
  34. Sprachstand
  35. Kommentierung von Art. 26 AEUV: Binnenmarkt
  36. Logistische Modelle für die Analyse innerbetrieblicher Lieferketten
  37. Plant communities of the summits of the Dund Saykhan mountain range (Southern Mongolia)