Anspannung: Introduction to concept and quantification of mental strain exemplified on data taken in five countries

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Anspannung: Introduction to concept and quantification of mental strain exemplified on data taken in five countries. / Müller, Friedrich; Mori, Shuji; Sakaki, Yuko et al.
In: Methods in Psychology, Vol. 7, 100098, 01.12.2022.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Müller F, Mori S, Sakaki Y, Yi K, Bae S, Tan Y et al. Anspannung: Introduction to concept and quantification of mental strain exemplified on data taken in five countries. Methods in Psychology. 2022 Dec 1;7:100098. doi: 10.1016/j.metip.2022.100098

Bibtex

@article{8f620fff2c9c4d92a55b1223a6191933,
title = "Anspannung: Introduction to concept and quantification of mental strain exemplified on data taken in five countries",
abstract = "In D{\"u}kers action theory Anspannung, which we translated as “psychological tension” (PT), is described as a directly experienced valid indicator for the extent of mental strain. In German-speaking regions the Category Partitioning technique (CP) has proven to be a useful method for accurately quantifying the experienced PT. Outside Germany, however, the concept of PT and the CP technique for measuring it have found little resonance, as it seemed that the central terms could not be meaningfully translated into English. To challenge these language barriers, test the applicability and usefulness of the PT concept, and evaluate the CP scaling method, we used the CP technique to quantify the level of PT required by 32 imagined everyday situations. To do this we adapted descriptions of the everyday situations from the German into English, Japanese, Korean, and Mandarin Chinese, and enrolled N = 158 participants from five countries (Canada, Germany, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan). The results show a remarkable agreement between the data collected in the five cohorts. The experimental data point to the universality of the experience of mental load in culturally and linguistically diverse societies. They also point to the need to design scaling techniques so that respondents can describe their immediate sensations as they would in everyday life.",
keywords = "Anspannung, Category partitioning, Cultural comparisons, Mental strain, Psychological tension, Psychophysical scaling, Business psychology",
author = "Friedrich M{\"u}ller and Shuji Mori and Yuko Sakaki and Kwangoh Yi and Sungbong Bae and Yuka Tan and Ward, {Lawrence M.}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The Authors",
year = "2022",
month = dec,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.metip.2022.100098",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
journal = "Methods in Psychology",
issn = "2590-2601",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Anspannung

T2 - Introduction to concept and quantification of mental strain exemplified on data taken in five countries

AU - Müller, Friedrich

AU - Mori, Shuji

AU - Sakaki, Yuko

AU - Yi, Kwangoh

AU - Bae, Sungbong

AU - Tan, Yuka

AU - Ward, Lawrence M.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Authors

PY - 2022/12/1

Y1 - 2022/12/1

N2 - In Dükers action theory Anspannung, which we translated as “psychological tension” (PT), is described as a directly experienced valid indicator for the extent of mental strain. In German-speaking regions the Category Partitioning technique (CP) has proven to be a useful method for accurately quantifying the experienced PT. Outside Germany, however, the concept of PT and the CP technique for measuring it have found little resonance, as it seemed that the central terms could not be meaningfully translated into English. To challenge these language barriers, test the applicability and usefulness of the PT concept, and evaluate the CP scaling method, we used the CP technique to quantify the level of PT required by 32 imagined everyday situations. To do this we adapted descriptions of the everyday situations from the German into English, Japanese, Korean, and Mandarin Chinese, and enrolled N = 158 participants from five countries (Canada, Germany, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan). The results show a remarkable agreement between the data collected in the five cohorts. The experimental data point to the universality of the experience of mental load in culturally and linguistically diverse societies. They also point to the need to design scaling techniques so that respondents can describe their immediate sensations as they would in everyday life.

AB - In Dükers action theory Anspannung, which we translated as “psychological tension” (PT), is described as a directly experienced valid indicator for the extent of mental strain. In German-speaking regions the Category Partitioning technique (CP) has proven to be a useful method for accurately quantifying the experienced PT. Outside Germany, however, the concept of PT and the CP technique for measuring it have found little resonance, as it seemed that the central terms could not be meaningfully translated into English. To challenge these language barriers, test the applicability and usefulness of the PT concept, and evaluate the CP scaling method, we used the CP technique to quantify the level of PT required by 32 imagined everyday situations. To do this we adapted descriptions of the everyday situations from the German into English, Japanese, Korean, and Mandarin Chinese, and enrolled N = 158 participants from five countries (Canada, Germany, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan). The results show a remarkable agreement between the data collected in the five cohorts. The experimental data point to the universality of the experience of mental load in culturally and linguistically diverse societies. They also point to the need to design scaling techniques so that respondents can describe their immediate sensations as they would in everyday life.

KW - Anspannung

KW - Category partitioning

KW - Cultural comparisons

KW - Mental strain

KW - Psychological tension

KW - Psychophysical scaling

KW - Business psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85133206564&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/feb531a6-7ad0-3af7-a6ac-4ea5905dd61f/

U2 - 10.1016/j.metip.2022.100098

DO - 10.1016/j.metip.2022.100098

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85133206564

VL - 7

JO - Methods in Psychology

JF - Methods in Psychology

SN - 2590-2601

M1 - 100098

ER -

Documents

DOI