An interdisciplinary methodological guide for quantifying associations between ecosystem services

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

An interdisciplinary methodological guide for quantifying associations between ecosystem services. / Mouchet, Maud A.; Lamarque, Pénélope; Martín-López, Berta et al.
In: Global Environmental Change : Human and Policy Dimensions, Vol. 28, No. 1, 01.09.2014, p. 298-308.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Mouchet MA, Lamarque P, Martín-López B, Crouzat E, Gos P, Byczek C et al. An interdisciplinary methodological guide for quantifying associations between ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change : Human and Policy Dimensions. 2014 Sept 1;28(1):298-308. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.07.012

Bibtex

@article{908842786dd14f9da6b0423448bcb57f,
title = "An interdisciplinary methodological guide for quantifying associations between ecosystem services",
abstract = "Considering the increasing uptake of the concept of {"}ecosystem services{"} in landscape management and environmental policies, it is urgent to establish a consensual framework to assess the complex relationships among ecosystem services, considering both the supply- and the demand-sides. A diversity of approaches have been proposed to evaluate ecosystem services associations, but not all methods are equivalent and methodological choices need to be made depending on the scientific and policy questions at hand, as well as the type of data available. Based on previous classifications of ecosystem service associations, we propose to characterize three broad types of associations considering the ecological (supply side) and socio-economical (demand side) aspects of ecosystem services: supply-supply, supply-demand and demand-demand. We then review quantitative methods available and propose guidelines to assess those three categories of relationships among ecosystem services and identify their explanatory variables following three steps: (i) detecting ecosystem services associations, (ii) defining bundles and (iii) identifying the explanatory variables of ecosystem services associations. For each step, strengths and weaknesses of different statistical analysis and machine learning methods are described. The proposed interdisciplinary methodological approach takes one step toward embracing such complexity of socio-ecological systems as it considers ecosystem services delivery (supply-supply), stakeholders' needs (demand-demand), and on how stakeholders can benefit from the ecosystem services delivery (supply-demand). We illustrate how such a diverse spectrum of methods may apply for land management.",
keywords = "Bundle, Ecosystem services, Methodological framework, Synergy, Trade-off assessment, Sustainability Science",
author = "Mouchet, {Maud A.} and P{\'e}n{\'e}lope Lamarque and Berta Mart{\'i}n-L{\'o}pez and Emilie Crouzat and Pierre Gos and Coline Byczek and Sandra Lavorel",
year = "2014",
month = sep,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.07.012",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "298--308",
journal = "Global Environmental Change : Human and Policy Dimensions",
issn = "0959-3780",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - An interdisciplinary methodological guide for quantifying associations between ecosystem services

AU - Mouchet, Maud A.

AU - Lamarque, Pénélope

AU - Martín-López, Berta

AU - Crouzat, Emilie

AU - Gos, Pierre

AU - Byczek, Coline

AU - Lavorel, Sandra

PY - 2014/9/1

Y1 - 2014/9/1

N2 - Considering the increasing uptake of the concept of "ecosystem services" in landscape management and environmental policies, it is urgent to establish a consensual framework to assess the complex relationships among ecosystem services, considering both the supply- and the demand-sides. A diversity of approaches have been proposed to evaluate ecosystem services associations, but not all methods are equivalent and methodological choices need to be made depending on the scientific and policy questions at hand, as well as the type of data available. Based on previous classifications of ecosystem service associations, we propose to characterize three broad types of associations considering the ecological (supply side) and socio-economical (demand side) aspects of ecosystem services: supply-supply, supply-demand and demand-demand. We then review quantitative methods available and propose guidelines to assess those three categories of relationships among ecosystem services and identify their explanatory variables following three steps: (i) detecting ecosystem services associations, (ii) defining bundles and (iii) identifying the explanatory variables of ecosystem services associations. For each step, strengths and weaknesses of different statistical analysis and machine learning methods are described. The proposed interdisciplinary methodological approach takes one step toward embracing such complexity of socio-ecological systems as it considers ecosystem services delivery (supply-supply), stakeholders' needs (demand-demand), and on how stakeholders can benefit from the ecosystem services delivery (supply-demand). We illustrate how such a diverse spectrum of methods may apply for land management.

AB - Considering the increasing uptake of the concept of "ecosystem services" in landscape management and environmental policies, it is urgent to establish a consensual framework to assess the complex relationships among ecosystem services, considering both the supply- and the demand-sides. A diversity of approaches have been proposed to evaluate ecosystem services associations, but not all methods are equivalent and methodological choices need to be made depending on the scientific and policy questions at hand, as well as the type of data available. Based on previous classifications of ecosystem service associations, we propose to characterize three broad types of associations considering the ecological (supply side) and socio-economical (demand side) aspects of ecosystem services: supply-supply, supply-demand and demand-demand. We then review quantitative methods available and propose guidelines to assess those three categories of relationships among ecosystem services and identify their explanatory variables following three steps: (i) detecting ecosystem services associations, (ii) defining bundles and (iii) identifying the explanatory variables of ecosystem services associations. For each step, strengths and weaknesses of different statistical analysis and machine learning methods are described. The proposed interdisciplinary methodological approach takes one step toward embracing such complexity of socio-ecological systems as it considers ecosystem services delivery (supply-supply), stakeholders' needs (demand-demand), and on how stakeholders can benefit from the ecosystem services delivery (supply-demand). We illustrate how such a diverse spectrum of methods may apply for land management.

KW - Bundle

KW - Ecosystem services

KW - Methodological framework

KW - Synergy

KW - Trade-off assessment

KW - Sustainability Science

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84918814568&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/154d8e0a-ce0b-399c-88eb-6130363d9f83/

U2 - 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.07.012

DO - 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.07.012

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:84918814568

VL - 28

SP - 298

EP - 308

JO - Global Environmental Change : Human and Policy Dimensions

JF - Global Environmental Change : Human and Policy Dimensions

SN - 0959-3780

IS - 1

ER -

Recently viewed

Activities

  1. Eine Podiumsdiskussion zu Fracking
  2. „Reichsbürger and Temporalities“
  3. Symposium "Informatik in ihrer Vielfalt" - 2013
  4. PEER Group Workshop - 2013
  5. Negotiating normativity: discourses of (non) belonging and (non) coincidences in the context of transnational adoption
  6. Probleme mit zukünftigen Generationen
  7. The Sustainable State.
  8. Anders Schreiben
  9. Learning and Instruction (Fachzeitschrift)
  10. 15th International Conference on Sensors and Measurement Technology - SENSOR 2011
  11. Analysis of kinetic damping in the spectrum of the impedance probe by means of a block-based LU decomposition
  12. Connect US – A Discussion of Innovative Teaching Projects
  13. IECER 2008
  14. Career paths and cross-roads: Metaphor as a conceptualisation device (Universität Paderborn, invited talk)
  15. Analysing Improvement Processes in the Context of School Inspection
  16. Technische Universität Lodz
  17. Scene as Ecosystem, Scenes as Parts of Ecosystems or Scene versus Ecosystem? Some considerations about the compability of two conceptional approaches
  18. Cross-Cultural Validation of the LLWI: Example of an English Language Version
  19. Does the Method of Limits reveal Subjects` Capability to Determine Odor Thresholds?
  20. Universität Wien
  21. Symposium "Publicum"
  22. Supporting Enlightened Public Thought - 2020
  23. Workshop „Different Worlds of Political Party Development. Comparative Analysis of the Institutionalization of Political Parties“
  24. Conception of a heat storage system for household applications
  25. Anthropocene Campus 2016: The Technosphere Issue
  26. Resource use and competition between honey bees and wild bees in the Lüneburger Heath
  27. Fostering Oral Skills Through the Use of Participatory Web 2.0 Technologies in the Project-based EFL Classroom

Publications

  1. Developing spatial biophysical accounting for multiple ecosystem services
  2. Microstructural and mechanical aspects of reinforcement welds for lightweight components produced by friction hydro pillar processing
  3. Pushing the Boundaries
  4. A cascade regulator using Lyapunov's PID-PID controllers for an aggregate actuator in automotive applications
  5. Other spaces
  6. A robust model predictive control using a feedforward structure for a hybrid hydraulic piezo actuator in camless internal combustion engines
  7. Determinants of entrepreneurial intent: A meta-analytic test and integration of competing models
  8. High-precision frequency measurements: indispensable tools at the core of the molecular-level analysis of complex systems.
  9. Future-proofing ecosystem restoration through enhancing adaptive capacity
  10. Comparative study of resonant circuit for power transmission via inductive link
  11. The link between in- and external rotation of the auditor and the quality of financial accounting and external audit
  12. The feasibility of using Apple's ResearchKit for recruitment and data collection
  13. Education and Communication as Prerequisites for and Components of Sustainable Development. Reflections for Policies, Conceptual Work, and Theory, Based on Previous Practises
  14. Self-perception of the internal audit function within the corporate governance system - Empirical evidence for the European Union
  15. Value-based management in banking
  16. Which nudges get support - A Quantitative Analysis of the Dimensions Transparency and Dual Process Theory
  17. Deconstructing and reconstructing diversity in client-provider-relationships of social work
  18. Integration durch soziale Kontrolle?
  19. Enhancing the structural diversity between forest patches — A concept and real-world experiment to study biodiversity, multifunctionality and forest resilience across spatial scales