Activity- vs. structural-oriented treatment approach for frozen shoulder: A randomized controlled trial

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Activity- vs. structural-oriented treatment approach for frozen shoulder : A randomized controlled trial. / Horst, Renata; Maicki, Tomasz; TrAbka, Rafal et al.

In: Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 31, No. 5, 01.05.2017, p. 686-695.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Horst, R, Maicki, T, TrAbka, R, Albrecht, S, Schmidt, K, Mtel, S & Von Piekartz, H 2017, 'Activity- vs. structural-oriented treatment approach for frozen shoulder: A randomized controlled trial', Clinical Rehabilitation, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 686-695. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215516687613

APA

Horst, R., Maicki, T., TrAbka, R., Albrecht, S., Schmidt, K., Mtel, S., & Von Piekartz, H. (2017). Activity- vs. structural-oriented treatment approach for frozen shoulder: A randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation, 31(5), 686-695. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215516687613

Vancouver

Horst R, Maicki T, TrAbka R, Albrecht S, Schmidt K, Mtel S et al. Activity- vs. structural-oriented treatment approach for frozen shoulder: A randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation. 2017 May 1;31(5):686-695. doi: 10.1177/0269215516687613

Bibtex

@article{22e2a6a07eb941128f823ab2bfd03031,
title = "Activity- vs. structural-oriented treatment approach for frozen shoulder: A randomized controlled trial",
abstract = "Objective: To compare the short- and long-term effects of a structural-oriented (convential) with an activity-oriented physiotherapeutic treatment in patients with frozen shoulder. Design: Double-blinded, randomized, experimental study. Setting: Outpatient clinic. Subjects: We included patients diagnosed with a limited range of motion and pain in the shoulder region, who had received a prescription for physiotherapy treatment, without additional symptoms of dizziness, a case history of headaches, pain and/or limited range of motion in the cervical spine and/or temporomandibular joint. Interventions: The study group received treatment during the performance of activities. The comparison group was treated with manual therapy and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (conventional therapy). Both groups received 10 days of therapy, 30 minutes each day. Main measures: Range of motion, muscle function tests, McGill pain questionnaire and modified Upper Extremity Motor Activity Log were measured at baseline, after two weeks of intervention and after a three-month follow-up period without therapy. Results: A total of 66 patients were randomized into two groups: The activity-oriented group (n = 33, mean = 44 years, SD = 16 years) including 20 male (61%) and the structural-oriented group (n = 33, mean = 47 years, SD = 17 years) including 21 male (64%). The activity-oriented group revealed significantly greater improvements in the performance of daily life activities and functional and structural tests compared with the group treated with conventional therapy after 10 days of therapy and at the three-month follow-up (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Therapy based on performing activities seems to be more effective for pain reduction and the ability to perform daily life activities than conventional treatment methods.",
keywords = "manual therapy, motor learning, neuro-orthopaedic activity-dependent plasticity, pain, proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation, Shoulder, Health sciences",
author = "Renata Horst and Tomasz Maicki and Rafal TrAbka and Sindy Albrecht and Katharina Schmidt and Sylwia Mtel and {Von Piekartz}, Harry",
year = "2017",
month = may,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0269215516687613",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "686--695",
journal = "Clinical Rehabilitation",
issn = "0269-2155",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Activity- vs. structural-oriented treatment approach for frozen shoulder

T2 - A randomized controlled trial

AU - Horst, Renata

AU - Maicki, Tomasz

AU - TrAbka, Rafal

AU - Albrecht, Sindy

AU - Schmidt, Katharina

AU - Mtel, Sylwia

AU - Von Piekartz, Harry

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

N2 - Objective: To compare the short- and long-term effects of a structural-oriented (convential) with an activity-oriented physiotherapeutic treatment in patients with frozen shoulder. Design: Double-blinded, randomized, experimental study. Setting: Outpatient clinic. Subjects: We included patients diagnosed with a limited range of motion and pain in the shoulder region, who had received a prescription for physiotherapy treatment, without additional symptoms of dizziness, a case history of headaches, pain and/or limited range of motion in the cervical spine and/or temporomandibular joint. Interventions: The study group received treatment during the performance of activities. The comparison group was treated with manual therapy and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (conventional therapy). Both groups received 10 days of therapy, 30 minutes each day. Main measures: Range of motion, muscle function tests, McGill pain questionnaire and modified Upper Extremity Motor Activity Log were measured at baseline, after two weeks of intervention and after a three-month follow-up period without therapy. Results: A total of 66 patients were randomized into two groups: The activity-oriented group (n = 33, mean = 44 years, SD = 16 years) including 20 male (61%) and the structural-oriented group (n = 33, mean = 47 years, SD = 17 years) including 21 male (64%). The activity-oriented group revealed significantly greater improvements in the performance of daily life activities and functional and structural tests compared with the group treated with conventional therapy after 10 days of therapy and at the three-month follow-up (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Therapy based on performing activities seems to be more effective for pain reduction and the ability to perform daily life activities than conventional treatment methods.

AB - Objective: To compare the short- and long-term effects of a structural-oriented (convential) with an activity-oriented physiotherapeutic treatment in patients with frozen shoulder. Design: Double-blinded, randomized, experimental study. Setting: Outpatient clinic. Subjects: We included patients diagnosed with a limited range of motion and pain in the shoulder region, who had received a prescription for physiotherapy treatment, without additional symptoms of dizziness, a case history of headaches, pain and/or limited range of motion in the cervical spine and/or temporomandibular joint. Interventions: The study group received treatment during the performance of activities. The comparison group was treated with manual therapy and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (conventional therapy). Both groups received 10 days of therapy, 30 minutes each day. Main measures: Range of motion, muscle function tests, McGill pain questionnaire and modified Upper Extremity Motor Activity Log were measured at baseline, after two weeks of intervention and after a three-month follow-up period without therapy. Results: A total of 66 patients were randomized into two groups: The activity-oriented group (n = 33, mean = 44 years, SD = 16 years) including 20 male (61%) and the structural-oriented group (n = 33, mean = 47 years, SD = 17 years) including 21 male (64%). The activity-oriented group revealed significantly greater improvements in the performance of daily life activities and functional and structural tests compared with the group treated with conventional therapy after 10 days of therapy and at the three-month follow-up (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Therapy based on performing activities seems to be more effective for pain reduction and the ability to perform daily life activities than conventional treatment methods.

KW - manual therapy

KW - motor learning

KW - neuro-orthopaedic activity-dependent plasticity

KW - pain

KW - proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation

KW - Shoulder

KW - Health sciences

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018309165&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/879ec1ee-ef3c-3015-9a28-e0a6cc35926a/

U2 - 10.1177/0269215516687613

DO - 10.1177/0269215516687613

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 28081633

AN - SCOPUS:85018309165

VL - 31

SP - 686

EP - 695

JO - Clinical Rehabilitation

JF - Clinical Rehabilitation

SN - 0269-2155

IS - 5

ER -

DOI