A Conceptual Structure of Justice - Providing a Tool to Analyse Conceptions of Justice

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

Justice is a contested concept. There are many different and competing conceptions, i.e. interpretations of the concept. Different domains of justice deal with different fields of application of justice claims, such as structural justice, distributive justice, participatory justice or recognition. We present a formal conceptual structure of justice applicable to all these domains. We show that conceptions of justice can be described by specifying the following conceptual elements: the judicandum (that which is to be judged as just or unjust), the community of justice including claim holders and claim addressees, their claims (and obligations), the informational base for the assessment, the principles of justice, and on a more practical level, the instruments of justice. By specifying these conceptual elements of justice, it is possible to analyse and compare different conceptions of justice, to assess their internal consistency, to explore new definitions of justice in an analytical way, and to explicate an idea of justice in a manner that provides concrete links to the relevant context.
Original languageEnglish
JournalEthical Theory and Moral Practice
Volume19
Issue number5
Pages (from-to)1187-1202
Number of pages16
ISSN1386-2820
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.11.2016

    Research areas

  • Sustainability Science - Conceptual structure of justice, Meta-ethics, Institutional implementation, Ideal and non-ideal theory, Empirical justice research, Concept and conception, Environmental Justice, Sustainability, Capabilities, Equality, Welfare

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Glitch(ing)! A refusal and gateway to more caring techno-urban worlds?
  2. Hot forging of cast magnesium alloy TX31 using semi-closed die and its finite element simulation
  3. MICSIM: Concept, Developments, and Applications of a PC Microsimulation Model for Research and Teaching
  4. Effectiveness of a gratitude app at reducing repetitive negative thinking as a transdiagnostic risk factor in the general population
  5. Land use affects dung beetle communities and their ecosystem service in forests and grasslands
  6. Temporal and thermodynamic irreversibility in production theory
  7. Investigation of the utilization of oat pomace and acid whey in technical scale succinic acid fermentation including downstream processing
  8. New incremental methods for springback compensation by stress superposition
  9. Introduction to the basics of life cycle sustainability assessment focusing on the UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative LCSA framework
  10. Assessing mire-specific biodiversity with an indicator based approach
  11. The frame of the game
  12. Using machine learning to identify important predictors of COVID-19 infection prevention behaviors during the early phase of the pandemic
  13. The Influence of Adjustment Costs on Labour Adjustment: An Analysis Using Panel Data for Manufacturing Establishments in Lower Saxony
  14. Global assessment of the non-equilibrium theory of rangelands
  15. The emergence of selection rules and their encounter with group theory, 1913-1927
  16. Communicating Uncertainties About the Effects of Medical Interventions Using Different Display Formats
  17. Epistemic Domination by Data Extraction
  18. Methods in sustainability science
  19. Ionic liquids vs. ethanol as extraction media of algicidal compounds from mango processing waste
  20. Bitcoin und Blockchain
  21. How much can we learn about voluntary climate action from behavior in public goods games?
  22. Later Life Workplace Index: Validation of an English Version
  23. Electrical and Mechanical Characterization of Polymer Nanofibers for Sensor Application
  24. DSM-IV und DSM-5
  25. Probing turbulent superstructures in Rayleigh-Bénard convection by Lagrangian trajectory clusters
  26. Changing learning environments at university?
  27. Convergence or mediation? Experts of vulnerability and the vulnerability of experts' discourses on nanotechnologies