Social-Ecological Systems Institute (SESI)
Organisational unit: Institute
Organisation profile
Vision & Mission
We envision a fair world where the benefits generated within social-ecological systems are shared sustainably with other species, both within and across generations. Solutions to sustainability challenges are developed collaboratively across diverse scientific disciplines, knowledge systems, and social interests. To realise our vision, we recognise the need for transformative change. In pursuit of such change we:
- use place-based social-ecological systems thinking to understand and resolve sustainability challenges such as biodiversity loss and environmental injustice;
- bring together insights and approaches from the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities in genuinely collaborative endeavours;
- integrate experiences, practices, and understandings from diverse knowledge systems;
- embed tools for transformative change into the social-ecological systems thinking via a leverage points perspective;
- develop and apply methods to bridge multiple scales and governance levels; and
- provide spaces for people sharing our vision to meet and exchange ideas.
Main research areas
We primarily conduct integrative and transdisciplinary research. In particular, the following topics are central to the Institute's research work:
- Biodiversity conservation
- Biocultural diversity
- Cross-scale governance
- Leverage points & transformation
- Ecosystem services
- Relational values
- Environmental justice
- Published
´Natur/en´ als Räume des Vor_Sorgens: Eine (re)produktionstheorethische Reflexion des ´Caring for nature/s´
Mölders, T. & Hofmeister, S., 2018, Zum Selbstverständnis der Gender-Studies II: Technik - Raum - Bildung. Onnen, C. & Rode-Breymann, S. (eds.). 1 ed. Berlin: Verlag Babara Budrich, Vol. 2. p. 65-82 18 p. (L'AGENda; vol. 2).Research output: Contributions to collected editions/works › Contributions to collected editions/anthologies › Research
- Published
Nature-gender relations within a Social-Ecological Perspective on European Multifunctional Agriculture: The Case of Agrobiodiversity
Burandt, A. & Mölders, T., 01.12.2017, In: Agriculture and Human Values. 34, 4, p. 955–967 13 p.Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
- Published
Natur der Zeiten - Zeiten der Natur oder "Momos Entdeckung". Zur Bedeutung der Verbindung von Reproduktion und Innovation für das Verständnis einer nachhaltigen Entwicklung
Hofmeister, S., 1999, Zeitlandschaften - Perspektiven öko-soziale Zeitpolitik. Hofmeister, S. & Spitzner, M. (eds.). Stuttgart: S. Hirzel Verlag, p. 83-106 23 p.Research output: Contributions to collected editions/works › Contributions to collected editions/anthologies › Research
- Published
Naturbilder, von der Vorstellung zum Handeln
Weiland, S. & Mölders, T., 2007, Agrarpolitik im 21. Jahrhundert: Wahrnehmungen, Konflikte, Verständigungsbedarf. Feindt, P. H. & Lange, J. (eds.). p. 203-212 10 p. (Loccumer Protokolle; vol. 30, no. 07).Research output: Contributions to collected editions/works › Article in conference proceedings › Research
- Published
Naturaleza en lienzo: narraciones sobre relaciones humanos-naturaleza usando métodos basados en arte en La Paz, Bolivia
Benavides-Frias, C., Ortiz-Przychodzka, S. & Schaal, T., 30.09.2022, In: Letras Verdes. 32, 32, p. 67-87 21 p.Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
- Published
National sustainability strategies: "blind spots" from and for gender perspectives – Example Germany
Hofmeister, S. & Weller, I., 2008, Sustainable Development: Past Conflicts and Future Challenges. Taking Stock of the Sustainable Discourse. Spangenberg, J. H. (ed.). Münster: Verlag Westfälisches Dampfboot, p. 177-197 21 p.Research output: Contributions to collected editions/works › Contributions to collected editions/anthologies › Research › peer-review
- Published
Nationale Nachhaltigkeitsstrategien - "blinde Flecken" aus und für Genderperspektiven
Hofmeister, S. & Weller, I., 2004, Bremen: Universität Bremen, 17 p. (Bremer Diskussionspapiere zur institutionellen Ökonomie und Sozial-Ökonomie; no. 55).Research output: Working paper › Working papers
- Published
National ecosystem restoration pledges are mismatched with social-ecological enabling conditions
Benra, F., Brück, M., Sigman, E., Pacheco-Romero, M., Shumi, G., Abson, D. J., Frietsch, M. & Fischer, J., 12.2024, In: Communications Earth and Environment. 5, 1, 10 p., 731.Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
- Published
Nachhaltig transformativ? Wie Geschlechterperspektiven die Transformationsdebatte/n zu transformieren vermögen....
Amri-Henkel, A., Biesecker, A., Breitenbach, S., Hofmeister, S., Lenz, C. & Moths, K., 2017, Wuppertal: Wuppertal Institut für Klima, Umwelt, Energie, 21 p. (TraVo-Text; no. Mai 2017).Research output: Working paper › Working papers
- Published
Nachhaltigkeit und Geschlechtergerechtigkeit – ein sperriges und zugleich unverzichtbares Feld für Zukunftsentwicklungen: Ansätze, Hindernisse und Herausforderungen
Karsten, M.-E., Mölders, T. & Hofmeister, S., 2003, In: Zeitschrift für Frauenforschung & Geschlechterstudien. 21, 2/3, p. 127-132 6 p.Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review