Social-Ecological Systems Institute (SESI)

Organisational unit: Institute

Organisation profile

Vision & Mission

We envision a fair world where the benefits generated within social-ecological systems are shared sustainably with other species, both within and across generations. Solutions to sustainability challenges are developed collaboratively across diverse scientific disciplines, knowledge systems, and social interests. To realise our vision, we recognise the need for transformative change. In pursuit of such change we:

  • use place-based social-ecological systems thinking to understand and resolve sustainability challenges such as biodiversity loss and environmental injustice;
  • bring together insights and approaches from the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities in genuinely collaborative endeavours;
  • integrate experiences, practices, and understandings from diverse knowledge systems;
  • embed tools for transformative change into the social-ecological systems thinking via a leverage points perspective;
  • develop and apply methods to bridge multiple scales and governance levels; and
  • provide spaces for people sharing our vision to meet and exchange ideas.

Main research areas

We primarily conduct integrative and transdisciplinary research. In particular, the following topics are central to the Institute's research work:

  • Biodiversity conservation
  • Biocultural diversity
  • Cross-scale governance
  • Leverage points & transformation
  • Ecosystem services
  • Relational values
  • Environmental justice
  1. Published

    Auf der Suche nach zeitpolitischen Pfaden: Spaziergang in eine vielgestaltige und zukunftsoffene Landschaft der Zeiten

    Hofmeister, S. & Spitzner, M., 1999, Zeitlandschaften - Perspektiven öko-soziale Zeitpolitik. Hofmeister, S. & Spitzner, M. (eds.). Stuttgart: S. Hirzel Verlag, p. 9-32 23 p.

    Research output: Contributions to collected editions/worksContributions to collected editions/anthologiesResearch

  2. Published

    Aus(nahme)fälle in der Nachwuchsförderung: Qualifizierungen im Themenfeld "Gender und Nachhaltigkeit"

    Katz, C. & Mölders, T., 2004, Geschlechterverhältnisse: Analysen aus Wissenschaft, Politik und Praxis. Hertzfeldt, H., Schäfgen, K. & Veth, S. (eds.). Dietz Verlag, p. 254-262 10 p. (Texte/Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung; vol. 18).

    Research output: Contributions to collected editions/worksArticle in conference proceedingsResearch

  3. Published

    Australia’s Stock Route Network: 1. A review of its values, and implications for future management

    Lentini, P. E., Fischer, J., Gibbons, P., Lindenmayer, D. & Martin, T., 08.2011, In: Ecological Management & Restoration. 12, 2, p. 119-127 9 p.

    Research output: Journal contributionsScientific review articlesResearch

  4. Published

    Australia’s Stock Route Network: 2. Representation of fertile landscapes

    Lentini, P. E., Fischer, J., Gibbons, P., Lindenmayer, D. & Martin, T., 08.2011, In: Ecological Management & Restoration. 12, 2, p. 148-151 4 p.

    Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

  5. Published

    Aus-, Um-, Auf-Brüche: Forschungs- und Qualifizierungserfahrungen im Themenfeld "Gender und Nachhaltigkeit"

    Katz, C., Mölders, T. & Kägi, S., 01.05.2003, In: Feministische Studien. 21, 1, p. 137-147 11 p.

    Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearch

  6. Published

    Author Correction: Biocultural approaches to pollinator conservation (Nature Sustainability, (2019), 2, 3, (214-222), 10.1038/s41893-019-0244-z)

    Hill, R., Nates-Parra, G., Quezada-Euán, J. J. G., Buchori, D., LeBuhn, G., Maués, M. M., Pert, P. L., Kwapong, P. K., Saeed, S., Breslow, S. J., da Cunha, M. C., Dicks, L. V., Galetto, L., Gikungu, M., Howlett, B. G., Imperatriz-Fonseca, V. L., Lyver, P. O. B., Martín-López, B., Oteros-Rozas, E., Potts, S. G. & Roué, M., 01.04.2019, In: Nature Sustainability. 2, 4, p. 348-348 1 p.

    Research output: Journal contributionsOther (editorial matter etc.)Research

  7. Published

    Bakterien und Pilze haben keine Lobby: Gentechnisch veränderte Mikroorganismen und ihre Akzeptanz in der Lebensmittelproduktion

    Schmitt, H., 2011, Lüneburg: Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, 62 p. (PoNa-Paper ; no. 3).

    Research output: Working paperWorking papers

  8. Published

    Bats in a Farming Landscape Benefit from Linear Remnants and Unimproved Pastures

    Lentini, P. E., Gibbons, P., Fischer, J., Law, B., Hanspach, J. & Martin, T. G., 14.11.2012, In: PLoS ONE. 7, 11, 13 p., e48201.

    Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

  9. Published

    Bedeutsam oder irrelevant? Einschätzungen deutscher agrarpolitischer Akteure zur Gender-Dimension von GAP-Reform und ELER-VO

    Mölders, T., 2006, Hamburg: Universität Hamburg, Forschungsgruppe Technologiefolgenabschätzung zur Modernen Biotechnologie in der Pflanzenzüchtung und der Landwirtschaft, 23 p. (BIOGUM-Forschungsbericht; no. 16).

    Research output: Working paperResearch communication reportsTransfer

  10. Published

    Bedingungsloses Grundeinkommen aus feministischer Perspektive – Chance oder Stolperstein ?

    Gottschlich, D., 2008, Dokumentation 33. Kongress Frauen in Naturwissenschaft und Technik 17. bis 20. Mai 2007 in Lüneburg: Nachhaltig vorsorgen. T. N. U. M. N. I. F. E. V. (ed.). Technik, Naturwissenschaft und Mathematik nachhaltig in Frauenhand (TechNaM), p. 46-50 4 p.

    Research output: Contributions to collected editions/worksArticle in conference proceedingsTransfer

Previous 1...5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ...92 Next

Recently viewed