1. //
  2. Start
  3. //
  4. Publikationen
  5. Zukunftswechsel. überlegungen zu den Kri...
  6. Formate
  7. //

Zukunftswechsel. überlegungen zu den Krisenbegriffen Reinhart Kosellecks und Giovanni Arrighis

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Standard

Zukunftswechsel. überlegungen zu den Krisenbegriffen Reinhart Kosellecks und Giovanni Arrighis. / Esch, Felix Leonhart.
in: Philosophy Kitchen, Jahrgang 2023, Nr. 19, 15.10.2023, S. 89-101.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Harvard

Esch, FL 2023, 'Zukunftswechsel. überlegungen zu den Krisenbegriffen Reinhart Kosellecks und Giovanni Arrighis', Philosophy Kitchen, Jg. 2023, Nr. 19, S. 89-101. https://doi.org/10.13135/2385-1945/9378

APA

Esch, F. L. (2023). Zukunftswechsel. überlegungen zu den Krisenbegriffen Reinhart Kosellecks und Giovanni Arrighis. Philosophy Kitchen, 2023(19), 89-101. https://doi.org/10.13135/2385-1945/9378

Vancouver

Esch FL. Zukunftswechsel. überlegungen zu den Krisenbegriffen Reinhart Kosellecks und Giovanni Arrighis. Philosophy Kitchen. 2023 Okt 15;2023(19):89-101. doi: 10.13135/2385-1945/9378

Bibtex

@article{0d5519f71a424aa7bea35030a5d24b84,
title = "Zukunftswechsel. {\"u}berlegungen zu den Krisenbegriffen Reinhart Kosellecks und Giovanni Arrighis",
abstract = "Theories of crisis generally follow one of two conceptual paths: crisis is either conceived of as a repetitive pattern or it is eschatologically regarded as the ultimate crisis. This paper discusses Reinhart Koselleck{\textquoteright}s and Giovanni Arrighi{\textquoteright}s struggles with this bifurcation in relation to their concepts of modern history. On different levels of abstraction, both authors grapple with the fact that the concepts and formations of modernity do not allow for neither of these options, but rather evoke a different solution that paradoxically makes the opposites collapse. In this regard, their theories resemble fragmentary reflections by Walter Benjamin and Karl Marx. In light of such theories and contemporary developments, these critical reflections may be fruitful points of departure for coming to terms with our surroundings.",
keywords = "Philosophie",
author = "Esch, {Felix Leonhart}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023, University of Torino. All rights reserved.",
year = "2023",
month = oct,
day = "15",
doi = "10.13135/2385-1945/9378",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "2023",
pages = "89--101",
journal = "Philosophy Kitchen",
issn = "2385-1945",
publisher = "University of Torino",
number = "19",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Zukunftswechsel. überlegungen zu den Krisenbegriffen Reinhart Kosellecks und Giovanni Arrighis

AU - Esch, Felix Leonhart

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023, University of Torino. All rights reserved.

PY - 2023/10/15

Y1 - 2023/10/15

N2 - Theories of crisis generally follow one of two conceptual paths: crisis is either conceived of as a repetitive pattern or it is eschatologically regarded as the ultimate crisis. This paper discusses Reinhart Koselleck’s and Giovanni Arrighi’s struggles with this bifurcation in relation to their concepts of modern history. On different levels of abstraction, both authors grapple with the fact that the concepts and formations of modernity do not allow for neither of these options, but rather evoke a different solution that paradoxically makes the opposites collapse. In this regard, their theories resemble fragmentary reflections by Walter Benjamin and Karl Marx. In light of such theories and contemporary developments, these critical reflections may be fruitful points of departure for coming to terms with our surroundings.

AB - Theories of crisis generally follow one of two conceptual paths: crisis is either conceived of as a repetitive pattern or it is eschatologically regarded as the ultimate crisis. This paper discusses Reinhart Koselleck’s and Giovanni Arrighi’s struggles with this bifurcation in relation to their concepts of modern history. On different levels of abstraction, both authors grapple with the fact that the concepts and formations of modernity do not allow for neither of these options, but rather evoke a different solution that paradoxically makes the opposites collapse. In this regard, their theories resemble fragmentary reflections by Walter Benjamin and Karl Marx. In light of such theories and contemporary developments, these critical reflections may be fruitful points of departure for coming to terms with our surroundings.

KW - Philosophie

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85197243450&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.13135/2385-1945/9378

DO - 10.13135/2385-1945/9378

M3 - Zeitschriftenaufsätze

AN - SCOPUS:85197243450

VL - 2023

SP - 89

EP - 101

JO - Philosophy Kitchen

JF - Philosophy Kitchen

SN - 2385-1945

IS - 19

ER -

DOI