Who is a Migrant? Abandoning the Nation-State Point of View in the Study of Migration

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Who is a Migrant? Abandoning the Nation-State Point of View in the Study of Migration. / Scheel, Stephan; Tazzioli, Martina.
in: Migration Politics, Jahrgang 1, Nr. 1, 04.05.2022, S. 1-23.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{a73d0359aa9b4c4c82412fdf5f7dd991,
title = "Who is a Migrant? Abandoning the Nation-State Point of View in the Study of Migration",
abstract = "This article develops an alternative definition of a migrant that embraces the perspective of mobility. Starting from the observation that the term {\textquoteleft}migrant{\textquoteright} has become a stigmatizing label that problematizes the mobility or the residency of people designated as such, we in-vestigate the implications of nation-state centered conceptions of migration which define migration as movement from nation-state A to nation-state B. By asking {\textquoteleft}Who is a migrant in Europe today?{\textquoteright} we show that nation-state centered understandings of migration rest on a deeply entrenched methodological nationalism and implicate three epistemological traps that continue to shape much of the research on migration: first, the naturalization of the in-ternational nation-state order that results, secondly, in the ontologisation of {\textquoteleft}migrants{\textquoteright} as ready-available objects of research, while facilitating, thirdly, the framing of migration as problem of government. To overcome these epistemological traps, we develop an alternative conception of migration that, inspired by the autonomy of migration approach, adopts the perspective of mobility while highlighting the constitutive role that nation-states{\textquoteright} bordering practices play in the enactment of some people as migrants. Importantly, this definition al-lows to turn the study of instances of migrantisation into an analytical lens for investigating transformations in contemporary border and citizenship regimes.",
keywords = "Politics",
author = "Stephan Scheel and Martina Tazzioli",
year = "2022",
month = may,
day = "4",
doi = "10.21468/MigPol.1.1.002",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "1--23",
journal = "Migration Politics",
issn = "2949-8872",
publisher = "SciPost Foundation",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Who is a Migrant? Abandoning the Nation-State Point of View in the Study of Migration

AU - Scheel, Stephan

AU - Tazzioli, Martina

PY - 2022/5/4

Y1 - 2022/5/4

N2 - This article develops an alternative definition of a migrant that embraces the perspective of mobility. Starting from the observation that the term ‘migrant’ has become a stigmatizing label that problematizes the mobility or the residency of people designated as such, we in-vestigate the implications of nation-state centered conceptions of migration which define migration as movement from nation-state A to nation-state B. By asking ‘Who is a migrant in Europe today?’ we show that nation-state centered understandings of migration rest on a deeply entrenched methodological nationalism and implicate three epistemological traps that continue to shape much of the research on migration: first, the naturalization of the in-ternational nation-state order that results, secondly, in the ontologisation of ‘migrants’ as ready-available objects of research, while facilitating, thirdly, the framing of migration as problem of government. To overcome these epistemological traps, we develop an alternative conception of migration that, inspired by the autonomy of migration approach, adopts the perspective of mobility while highlighting the constitutive role that nation-states’ bordering practices play in the enactment of some people as migrants. Importantly, this definition al-lows to turn the study of instances of migrantisation into an analytical lens for investigating transformations in contemporary border and citizenship regimes.

AB - This article develops an alternative definition of a migrant that embraces the perspective of mobility. Starting from the observation that the term ‘migrant’ has become a stigmatizing label that problematizes the mobility or the residency of people designated as such, we in-vestigate the implications of nation-state centered conceptions of migration which define migration as movement from nation-state A to nation-state B. By asking ‘Who is a migrant in Europe today?’ we show that nation-state centered understandings of migration rest on a deeply entrenched methodological nationalism and implicate three epistemological traps that continue to shape much of the research on migration: first, the naturalization of the in-ternational nation-state order that results, secondly, in the ontologisation of ‘migrants’ as ready-available objects of research, while facilitating, thirdly, the framing of migration as problem of government. To overcome these epistemological traps, we develop an alternative conception of migration that, inspired by the autonomy of migration approach, adopts the perspective of mobility while highlighting the constitutive role that nation-states’ bordering practices play in the enactment of some people as migrants. Importantly, this definition al-lows to turn the study of instances of migrantisation into an analytical lens for investigating transformations in contemporary border and citizenship regimes.

KW - Politics

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/af200de5-a7aa-3109-9d19-3ceae5c9d36e/

U2 - 10.21468/MigPol.1.1.002

DO - 10.21468/MigPol.1.1.002

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 1

SP - 1

EP - 23

JO - Migration Politics

JF - Migration Politics

SN - 2949-8872

IS - 1

ER -

Dokumente

Links

DOI