Who are the workers who never joined a union? empirical evidence from Germany

Publikation: Arbeits- oder Diskussionspapiere und BerichteArbeits- oder Diskussionspapiere

Standard

Who are the workers who never joined a union? empirical evidence from Germany. / Schnabel, Claus; Wagner, Joachim.
Erlangen: Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 2005. (Diskussionspapiere; Nr. 37).

Publikation: Arbeits- oder Diskussionspapiere und BerichteArbeits- oder Diskussionspapiere

Harvard

Schnabel, C & Wagner, J 2005 'Who are the workers who never joined a union? empirical evidence from Germany' Diskussionspapiere, Nr. 37, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen. <https://www.arbeitsmarkt.rw.fau.de/files/2016/07/1270291314_dp37.pdf>

APA

Schnabel, C., & Wagner, J. (2005). Who are the workers who never joined a union? empirical evidence from Germany. (Diskussionspapiere; Nr. 37). Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg. https://www.arbeitsmarkt.rw.fau.de/files/2016/07/1270291314_dp37.pdf

Vancouver

Schnabel C, Wagner J. Who are the workers who never joined a union? empirical evidence from Germany. Erlangen: Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg. 2005. (Diskussionspapiere; 37).

Bibtex

@techreport{bc369b01bd5f4078921217b7dd188785,
title = "Who are the workers who never joined a union?: empirical evidence from Germany",
abstract = "Using representative data from the German social survey ALLBUS 2002 and the European Social Survey 2002/03, this paper provides the first empirical analysis of trade union never-membership in Germany. We show that between 54 and 59 percent of all employees in Germany have never been members of a trade union. Individuals' probability of never-membership is significantly affected by their personal characteristics (in particular age, education and status at work), their political orientation and (to a lesser degree) their family background, and by broad location. In addition, occupational and workplace characteristics play a significant role. Most important in this regard is the presence of a union at the workplace.",
keywords = "Economics, union membership, never-membership, Germany",
author = "Claus Schnabel and Joachim Wagner",
note = "Parallel als Online-Ausg. erschienen unter der Adresse http://www.arbeitsmarkt.wiso.uni-erlangen.de/pdf/diskussionspapiere/1270291314_dp37.pdf",
year = "2005",
language = "English",
series = "Diskussionspapiere",
publisher = "Friedrich-Alexander-Universit{\"a}t Erlangen-N{\"u}rnberg",
number = "37",
address = "Germany",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Friedrich-Alexander-Universit{\"a}t Erlangen-N{\"u}rnberg",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Who are the workers who never joined a union?

T2 - empirical evidence from Germany

AU - Schnabel, Claus

AU - Wagner, Joachim

N1 - Parallel als Online-Ausg. erschienen unter der Adresse http://www.arbeitsmarkt.wiso.uni-erlangen.de/pdf/diskussionspapiere/1270291314_dp37.pdf

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Using representative data from the German social survey ALLBUS 2002 and the European Social Survey 2002/03, this paper provides the first empirical analysis of trade union never-membership in Germany. We show that between 54 and 59 percent of all employees in Germany have never been members of a trade union. Individuals' probability of never-membership is significantly affected by their personal characteristics (in particular age, education and status at work), their political orientation and (to a lesser degree) their family background, and by broad location. In addition, occupational and workplace characteristics play a significant role. Most important in this regard is the presence of a union at the workplace.

AB - Using representative data from the German social survey ALLBUS 2002 and the European Social Survey 2002/03, this paper provides the first empirical analysis of trade union never-membership in Germany. We show that between 54 and 59 percent of all employees in Germany have never been members of a trade union. Individuals' probability of never-membership is significantly affected by their personal characteristics (in particular age, education and status at work), their political orientation and (to a lesser degree) their family background, and by broad location. In addition, occupational and workplace characteristics play a significant role. Most important in this regard is the presence of a union at the workplace.

KW - Economics

KW - union membership

KW - never-membership

KW - Germany

M3 - Working papers

T3 - Diskussionspapiere

BT - Who are the workers who never joined a union?

PB - Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg

CY - Erlangen

ER -

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Effect of thermal treatment on thermal expansion behaviour of magnesium alloy based hybrid composites
  2. Entrepreneurship Training and Transfer
  3. Les Anormaux
  4. § 354 Verwirkungsklausel
  5. Issuers’ credit risk and pricing of warrants in the recent financial crisis
  6. Ballon, Luftschiff, Flugzeug
  7. The Singapore Opinion or the End of Mixity as We Know It
  8. Intramedullary Mg2Ag nails augment callus formation during fracture healing in mice
  9. Eltern besser befähigen
  10. Racial bias in police traffic stops
  11. Time and economic well-being-a panel analysis of desired versus actual working hours
  12. Using social media photos to explore the relation between cultural ecosystem services and landscape features across five European sites
  13. Nachtragsbeispiele, Mengenermittlung und Gemeinkostenbilanz
  14. „Vom ‚Kunstrichter‘ zur ‚Schwarmintelligenz‘
  15. Municipal wastewater treatment and biomass accumulation with a wastewater-born and settleable algal-bacterial culture
  16. Film, oberflächlich simuliert
  17. Supply Chain Information in Environmental Management Accounting
  18. Green Extraction and NMR Analysis of Bioactives from Orange Juice Waste
  19. Brexit's implications for EU-NATO cooperation
  20. Nachhaltigkeitswissenschaften
  21. Business Model Assessment
  22. Kultur-Evolution: Partizipation und Nachhaltigkeit
  23. The Conjoined Twin Sisters Helen and Judith (1701-1723) and Their Pictorial Impact in Later 18th-Century Science
  24. PharmCycle
  25. Reading the invisible hand: Providence and equilibrium in religion and economics
  26. Teilhabe an JHWHs Macht
  27. Is it just conservation? A typology of Indigenous peoples’ and local communities’ roles in conserving biodiversity
  28. Syngritikē paidikē logotechnia
  29. Gaia's Game