Water-related problématiques: five archetypical contexts of water governance

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Water-related problématiques: five archetypical contexts of water governance. / Bilalova, Shahana; Villamayor-Tomas, Sergio; Newig, Jens.
in: Ecology and Society, Jahrgang 30, Nr. 1, 10, 01.2025.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{4920be462c2b478cac4c6882c5824918,
title = "Water-related probl{\'e}matiques: five archetypical contexts of water governance",
abstract = "It is necessary to consider the contextual factors surrounding water governance systems to understand their performance. We conducted a review of 165 empirical studies and 223 cases from the water governance literature to investigate water-related contexts. Our analysis is based on an archetype analysis of three dimensions of water-related contexts across 160 cases: water resources, related water uses, and sustainability issues. Our results show that there are five distinct water-related probl{\'e}matiques: “groundwater exploitation in agriculture,” “land and water systems sustainability,” “surface water pollution,” “industrial and household water security,” and “hydropower vs. water ecology.” These probl{\'e}matiques often exhibit geographical patterns and regional associations. Noteworthy insights from the analysis of probl{\'e}matiques include the prominence of the groundwater exploitation in agriculture probl{\'e}matique, contrary to arguments that groundwater is understudied, and the limited coverage of hydropower governance compared to other probl{\'e}matiques. Overall, our results enhance the understanding of contextual factors in water governance and suggest potential avenues for developing middle-range theories and advancing water governance diagnostics.",
keywords = "archetype, cluster analysis, context, water governance, water problems, Sustainability Governance, Environmental Governance",
author = "Shahana Bilalova and Sergio Villamayor-Tomas and Jens Newig",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2025 by the author(s).",
year = "2025",
month = jan,
doi = "10.5751/ES-15681-300110",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
journal = "Ecology and Society",
issn = "1708-3087",
publisher = "The Resilience Alliance",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Water-related problématiques

T2 - five archetypical contexts of water governance

AU - Bilalova, Shahana

AU - Villamayor-Tomas, Sergio

AU - Newig, Jens

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2025 by the author(s).

PY - 2025/1

Y1 - 2025/1

N2 - It is necessary to consider the contextual factors surrounding water governance systems to understand their performance. We conducted a review of 165 empirical studies and 223 cases from the water governance literature to investigate water-related contexts. Our analysis is based on an archetype analysis of three dimensions of water-related contexts across 160 cases: water resources, related water uses, and sustainability issues. Our results show that there are five distinct water-related problématiques: “groundwater exploitation in agriculture,” “land and water systems sustainability,” “surface water pollution,” “industrial and household water security,” and “hydropower vs. water ecology.” These problématiques often exhibit geographical patterns and regional associations. Noteworthy insights from the analysis of problématiques include the prominence of the groundwater exploitation in agriculture problématique, contrary to arguments that groundwater is understudied, and the limited coverage of hydropower governance compared to other problématiques. Overall, our results enhance the understanding of contextual factors in water governance and suggest potential avenues for developing middle-range theories and advancing water governance diagnostics.

AB - It is necessary to consider the contextual factors surrounding water governance systems to understand their performance. We conducted a review of 165 empirical studies and 223 cases from the water governance literature to investigate water-related contexts. Our analysis is based on an archetype analysis of three dimensions of water-related contexts across 160 cases: water resources, related water uses, and sustainability issues. Our results show that there are five distinct water-related problématiques: “groundwater exploitation in agriculture,” “land and water systems sustainability,” “surface water pollution,” “industrial and household water security,” and “hydropower vs. water ecology.” These problématiques often exhibit geographical patterns and regional associations. Noteworthy insights from the analysis of problématiques include the prominence of the groundwater exploitation in agriculture problématique, contrary to arguments that groundwater is understudied, and the limited coverage of hydropower governance compared to other problématiques. Overall, our results enhance the understanding of contextual factors in water governance and suggest potential avenues for developing middle-range theories and advancing water governance diagnostics.

KW - archetype

KW - cluster analysis

KW - context

KW - water governance

KW - water problems

KW - Sustainability Governance

KW - Environmental Governance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85216530196&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5751/ES-15681-300110

DO - 10.5751/ES-15681-300110

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85216530196

VL - 30

JO - Ecology and Society

JF - Ecology and Society

SN - 1708-3087

IS - 1

M1 - 10

ER -

DOI