Visualizing stakeholders’ willingness for collective action in participatory scenario planning

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Authors

  • María D. López-Rodríguez
  • Elisa Oteros-Rozas
  • Isabel Ruiz-Mallén
  • Hug March
  • Andra I. Horcea-Milcu
  • Maria Heras
  • Miguel A. Cebrián-Piqueras
  • Riley Andrade
  • Veronica B. P. G. Lo
  • Concepción Piñeiro
Participatory scenario planning is a powerful approach to guide diverse stakeholders in creating and reflecting on visions of plausible and desired futures. However, this process requires tools to guide collective action to implement such visions within management agendas. This study develops, applies, and analyzes a novel visual tool within a virtual participatory scenario planning process about the Sierra de Guadarrama National Park (Madrid, Spain). Building on the identification of stakeholders who might engage in scenario strategies, the visual tool guided them in defining tasks to be developed and envisioning their willingness to collaborate in their implementation. We qualitatively analyzed data from recordings, online field observations, a post-survey from the scenario planning process, and a successive policy workshop. Our findings show that the visual tool fosters dialogue between stakeholders to redistribute tasks for working together on needed strategies in the protected area while promoting reflection on their willingness to collaborate as a group to implement them. The visual tool provided graphic outcomes for nine strategies corresponding to pictures of who may or may not be willing to engage in implementing such strategies. We argue that the visual tool is a robust method that can complement participatory scenario planning processes by providing a useful starting point for creating action networks to incorporate the resulting scenario strategies into management agendas. We deliberate on the nature of the visual tool as a boundary object and discuss its role as a decision-support tool. In particular, we reflect on the potential contributions and limitations of the visual tool to four dimensions of participatory conservation governance during participatory scenario planning processes: inclusivity, integration, adaptation, and pluralism. Our study provides a practical orientation to adapt the tool to other contexts and knowledge co-creation processes.
OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer5
ZeitschriftEcology and Society
Jahrgang28
Ausgabenummer2
Anzahl der Seiten23
ISSN1708-3087
DOIs
PublikationsstatusErschienen - 05.2023

Bibliographische Notiz

Funding Information:
We are very grateful to the participants involved in the two workshops and surveys. We thank all the collaborators of the online PSP workshop for their valuable time, effort, and support: Cristina Quintas-Soriano, Federica Ravera, and Marina García-Llorente from FRACTAL Collective; Jorge Sánchez-Cruzado, Hugo Navascués, Leticia de Siles, Marien González-Hidalgo, and Olga Millán. Thanks are also extended to the creators of Streamline (Metzger and De Vries 2018) and the ScienSeed for adapting some of the infographic images from Streamline to the SGNP context. This research was supported by the ENVISION project, funded through the 2017-2018 Belmont Forum and BiodivERsA joint call for research proposals, under the BiodivScen ERA-Net COFUND programme, and with the support of the following national funders: Grant PCI2018-092958 funded by MCIN/AEI/ 10.13039/501100011033, Swedish Research Council for Sustainable Development (FORMAS), German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Grant Number: 01LC18064), Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO), National Science Foundation, United States (NSF), and National Park Service, United States (NPS). IRM acknowledges the support of the grant RYC-2015-17676 funded by MCIN/AEI/ 10.13039/501100011033 and by “ESF Investing in your future.” EOR acknowledges the support of the grant IJCI-2017-34334 funded by MCIN/AEI/ 10.13039/501100011033. AIHM acknowledges EU funding through the Marie Sklodowska‐ Curie grant number 840207.

Funding Information:
We are very grateful to the participants involved in the two workshops and surveys. We thank all the collaborators of the online PSP workshop for their valuable time, effort, and support: Cristina Quintas-Soriano, Federica Ravera, and Marina García-Llorente from FRACTAL Collective; Jorge Sánchez-Cruzado, Hugo Navascués, Leticia de Siles, Marien González-Hidalgo, and Olga Millán. Thanks are also extended to the creators of Streamline (Metzger and De Vries 2018) and the ScienSeed for adapting some of the infographic images from Streamline to the SGNP context. This research was supported by the ENVISION project, funded through the 2017-2018 Belmont Forum and BiodivERsA joint call for research proposals, under the BiodivScen ERA-Net COFUND programme, and with the support of the following national funders: Grant PCI2018-092958 funded by MCIN/AEI/ 10.13039/501100011033, Swedish Research Council for Sustainable Development (FORMAS), German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Grant Number: 01LC18064), Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO), National Science Foundation, United States (NSF), and National Park Service, United States (NPS). IRM acknowledges the support of the grant RYC-2015-17676 funded by MCIN/AEI/ 10.13039/501100011033 and by “ESF Investing in your future.” EOR acknowledges the support of the grant IJCI-2017-34334 funded by MCIN/AEI/ 10.13039/501100011033. AIHM acknowledges EU funding through the Marie Sklodowska Curie grant number 840207.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 by the author(s). Published here under license by the Resilience Alliance.

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Forschende

  1. Frank Schmielewski

Publikationen

  1. Integration of Material Flow Management into Company Processes within the Automotive Industry
  2. Supportive Mental Health Self-Monitoring among Smartphone Users with Psychological Distress
  3. The emotional spectrum in traffic situations: Results of two online-studies
  4. Notting Hill Gate 4 Basic
  5. The distribution of power within the community
  6. Mediengenealogie
  7. How much does agriculture depend on pollinators?
  8. Motivation related to work
  9. Inhibition of foam cell formation using a soluble CD68-Fc fusion protein
  10. Der Raum des Cyberspace
  11. Mad speculation and absolute inhumanism
  12. Every single word
  13. Analytical model to determine the strength of form-fit connection joined by die-less hydroforming
  14. Attention on the source of influence reverses the impact of cross-contextual imitation
  15. Transcending the transmission model
  16. Einleitung
  17. Methan - das unterschätzte Klimagas
  18. Rats dying for mice: Modelling the competitor release effect
  19. § 23 Wasserkraft
  20. Linked Data-driven Resilience Research 2023
  21. Community awareness and engagement for arsenic management
  22. The application of environmental ethics in biological conservation
  23. Do Online Training offer an effective Option for the Prevention and Health Promotion of Professionals? A systematic Overview and Meta-analysis
  24. Genotoxic effect of ciprofloxacin during photolytic decomposition monitored by the in vitro micronucleus test (MNvit) in HepG2 cells
  25. Beyond Tolerance
  26. Development of a magnesium recycling alloy based on AM50
  27. Democratic representation in the EU: Two kinds of subjectivity
  28. Intracellular Accumulation of Linezolid in Escherichia Coli, Citrobacter Freundii and Enterobacter Aerogenes
  29. Minor keywords of political theory
  30. Managerhaftung und persönliche Verantwortung
  31. Der Verlust der Dinge
  32. Separation of lactic acid and recovery of salt-ions from fermentation broth
  33. Fundamental Theology
  34. Electroanalytical and chromatographic determination of pentachlorophenol and related molecules in a contaminated soil
  35. § 18
  36. A mixed-method approach to post-retirement career planning
  37. Die Signal-Location-Methode zur Quantifizierung der Aufmerksamkeitsverteilung in dynamischen Szenarien