1. //
  2. Start
  3. //
  4. Publikationen
  5. Transparency and Representation of the P...
  6. Formate
  7. //

Transparency and Representation of the Public Interest in Investment Treaty Arbitration

Publikation: Beiträge in Sammelwerken › Kapitel › begutachtet

Standard

Transparency and Representation of the Public Interest in Investment Treaty Arbitration. / Asteriti, Alessandra; Tams, Christian .
International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law. Hrsg. / Stephan W. Schill. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. S. 787-816 25.

Publikation: Beiträge in Sammelwerken › Kapitel › begutachtet

Harvard

Asteriti, A & Tams, C 2011, Transparency and Representation of the Public Interest in Investment Treaty Arbitration. in SW Schill (Hrsg.), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law., 25, Oxford University Press, Oxford, S. 787-816. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199589104.003.0025

APA

Asteriti, A., & Tams, C. (2011). Transparency and Representation of the Public Interest in Investment Treaty Arbitration. In S. W. Schill (Hrsg.), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law (S. 787-816). Artikel 25 Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199589104.003.0025

Vancouver

Asteriti A, Tams C. Transparency and Representation of the Public Interest in Investment Treaty Arbitration. in Schill SW, Hrsg., International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2011. S. 787-816. 25 doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199589104.003.0025

Bibtex

@inbook{eac623aeda2a42cba49cb6b9a78d9ed5,
title = "Transparency and Representation of the Public Interest in Investment Treaty Arbitration",
abstract = "This chapter addresses one of the crucial tensions facing modern investment arbitration: that between confidentiality and privacy, on the one hand, and transparency and inclusiveness, on the other. It begins by reviewing how investment arbitration frameworks have addressed this tension so far, noting the traditional focus on confidentiality and privacy and the more recent trend towards transparency and inclusiveness of proceedings before ICSID and/or NAFTA tribunals. The chapter then compares domestic public law approaches to questions of transparency and public interest representation. Having reviewed US, English, French, German, and Greek law, it shows that domestic public law seems to accept the principle of transparency and provides for various forms of indirect public interest representation (e.g., through amicus curiae briefs) but also different forms of public interest claims. While this approach cannot be directly transposed to investment arbitration, it clearly can, and arguably should, guide the approach of investment lawyers.",
keywords = "Law, Investment Arbitration, confidentiality, transparency, public interest representation, standing, judicial review, amicus curiae, briefs, privacy, inclusiveness, locus standi",
author = "Alessandra Asteriti and Christian Tams",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} Oxford University Press, 2013. All Rights Reserved.",
year = "2011",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199589104.003.0025",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-0-19-958910-4",
pages = "787--816",
editor = "Schill, {Stephan W.}",
booktitle = "International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Transparency and Representation of the Public Interest in Investment Treaty Arbitration

AU - Asteriti, Alessandra

AU - Tams, Christian

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © Oxford University Press, 2013. All Rights Reserved.

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - This chapter addresses one of the crucial tensions facing modern investment arbitration: that between confidentiality and privacy, on the one hand, and transparency and inclusiveness, on the other. It begins by reviewing how investment arbitration frameworks have addressed this tension so far, noting the traditional focus on confidentiality and privacy and the more recent trend towards transparency and inclusiveness of proceedings before ICSID and/or NAFTA tribunals. The chapter then compares domestic public law approaches to questions of transparency and public interest representation. Having reviewed US, English, French, German, and Greek law, it shows that domestic public law seems to accept the principle of transparency and provides for various forms of indirect public interest representation (e.g., through amicus curiae briefs) but also different forms of public interest claims. While this approach cannot be directly transposed to investment arbitration, it clearly can, and arguably should, guide the approach of investment lawyers.

AB - This chapter addresses one of the crucial tensions facing modern investment arbitration: that between confidentiality and privacy, on the one hand, and transparency and inclusiveness, on the other. It begins by reviewing how investment arbitration frameworks have addressed this tension so far, noting the traditional focus on confidentiality and privacy and the more recent trend towards transparency and inclusiveness of proceedings before ICSID and/or NAFTA tribunals. The chapter then compares domestic public law approaches to questions of transparency and public interest representation. Having reviewed US, English, French, German, and Greek law, it shows that domestic public law seems to accept the principle of transparency and provides for various forms of indirect public interest representation (e.g., through amicus curiae briefs) but also different forms of public interest claims. While this approach cannot be directly transposed to investment arbitration, it clearly can, and arguably should, guide the approach of investment lawyers.

KW - Law

KW - Investment Arbitration

KW - confidentiality

KW - transparency

KW - public interest representation

KW - standing

KW - judicial review

KW - amicus curiae

KW - briefs

KW - privacy

KW - inclusiveness

KW - locus standi

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84920485933&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/a61c7926-1bc7-3786-87f5-1a7ac9f8d770/

U2 - 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199589104.003.0025

DO - 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199589104.003.0025

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-0-19-958910-4

SP - 787

EP - 816

BT - International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law

A2 - Schill, Stephan W.

PB - Oxford University Press

CY - Oxford

ER -

Weitere Publikationen dieser Person(en)

§ 4 The international legal framework governing the TCA

Tams, C. J., 2024, EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement: A Handbook. Kübek, G., Tams, C. J. & Terhechte, J. P. (Hrsg.). 1. Aufl. Oxford: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, S. 42-54 13 S.

Publikation: Beiträge in Sammelwerken › Kapitel

EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement: A Handbook

Kübek, G. (Hrsg.), Tams, C. J. (Hrsg.) & Terhechte, J. (Hrsg.), 2024, 1. Aufl. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG. 550 S.

Publikation: Bücher und Anthologien › Sammelwerke und Anthologien › Forschung

Editorial

Bäumler, J., Bungenberg, M., Krajewski, M., Rühl, G., Tams, C. J., Terhechte, J. P., Ziegler, A. R. & Binder, C., 2022, in: European Yearbook of International Economic Law. 12, S. v-ix 5 S.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Andere (Vorworte. Editoral u.ä.) › Forschung

Editorial

Bäumler, J., Binder, C., Bungenberg, M., Krajewski, M., Rühl, G., Tams, C. J., Terhechte, J. & Ziegler, A. R., 2022, European Yearbook of International Economic Law 2021 . Bäumler, J., Bungenberg, M., Rühl, G., Binder, C., Krajewski, M., Tams, C. J., Terhechte, J. P. & Ziegler, A. R. (Hrsg.). Springer, S. v-ix 4 S. (European Yearbook of International Economic Law (EUROYEAR); Band 12).

Publikation: Beiträge in Sammelwerken › Andere (Vor- und Nachworte ...) › Forschung

Encoding the law of State responsibility with courage and resolve: James Crawford and the 2001 Articles on State Responsibility

Paddeu, F. I. & Tams, C. J., 01.06.2022, in: Cambridge International Law Journal. 11, 1, S. 6-23 18 S.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

DOI