Toward a better understanding of the mindsets of negotiators: Development and construct validation of the Scale for the Integrative Mindset (SIM)

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Toward a better understanding of the mindsets of negotiators: Development and construct validation of the Scale for the Integrative Mindset (SIM). / Ade, Valentin; Dantlgraber, Michael; Schuster, Carolin et al.
in: European Journal of Psychological Assessment, Jahrgang 36, Nr. 5, a000548, 01.09.2020, S. 740-747.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{5767002953a54b45a8b5d2a4ee84a0b9,
title = "Toward a better understanding of the mindsets of negotiators: Development and construct validation of the Scale for the Integrative Mindset (SIM)",
abstract = "This article introduces and discusses the 15-item Scale for the Integrative Mindset (SIM) of negotiators, that is of people involved in joint decision-making processes. The scale is based on the integrative mindset (Ade, Schuster, Harinck, & Tr{\"o}tschel, 2018), which describes a set of three inclinations of parties approaching negotiations: a collaborative, a curious, and a creative one. Using a first sample (N = 1,030) of online survey participants, we provide evidence for a high psychometric quality of the SIM as suggested by high reliabilities and good fit indices. We also compare the SIM with scales that measure well-known and possibly related psychological constructs and show the SIM{\textquoteright}s distinction to them. Using a second sample (N = 417), we show how the SIM differs from a Scale on Inappropriate Negotiation Strategies (SINS) that has been used in previous negotiation research. The findings of the present studies are discussed with respect to potential applications of the SIM in experimental research.",
keywords = "Psychology, negotiation, integrative mindset, scale development, construct validation",
author = "Valentin Ade and Michael Dantlgraber and Carolin Schuster and Roman Tr{\"o}tschel",
year = "2020",
month = sep,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1027/1015-5759/a000548",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "740--747",
journal = "European Journal of Psychological Assessment",
issn = "1015-5759",
publisher = "Hogrefe Publishing",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Toward a better understanding of the mindsets of negotiators

T2 - Development and construct validation of the Scale for the Integrative Mindset (SIM)

AU - Ade, Valentin

AU - Dantlgraber, Michael

AU - Schuster, Carolin

AU - Trötschel, Roman

PY - 2020/9/1

Y1 - 2020/9/1

N2 - This article introduces and discusses the 15-item Scale for the Integrative Mindset (SIM) of negotiators, that is of people involved in joint decision-making processes. The scale is based on the integrative mindset (Ade, Schuster, Harinck, & Trötschel, 2018), which describes a set of three inclinations of parties approaching negotiations: a collaborative, a curious, and a creative one. Using a first sample (N = 1,030) of online survey participants, we provide evidence for a high psychometric quality of the SIM as suggested by high reliabilities and good fit indices. We also compare the SIM with scales that measure well-known and possibly related psychological constructs and show the SIM’s distinction to them. Using a second sample (N = 417), we show how the SIM differs from a Scale on Inappropriate Negotiation Strategies (SINS) that has been used in previous negotiation research. The findings of the present studies are discussed with respect to potential applications of the SIM in experimental research.

AB - This article introduces and discusses the 15-item Scale for the Integrative Mindset (SIM) of negotiators, that is of people involved in joint decision-making processes. The scale is based on the integrative mindset (Ade, Schuster, Harinck, & Trötschel, 2018), which describes a set of three inclinations of parties approaching negotiations: a collaborative, a curious, and a creative one. Using a first sample (N = 1,030) of online survey participants, we provide evidence for a high psychometric quality of the SIM as suggested by high reliabilities and good fit indices. We also compare the SIM with scales that measure well-known and possibly related psychological constructs and show the SIM’s distinction to them. Using a second sample (N = 417), we show how the SIM differs from a Scale on Inappropriate Negotiation Strategies (SINS) that has been used in previous negotiation research. The findings of the present studies are discussed with respect to potential applications of the SIM in experimental research.

KW - Psychology

KW - negotiation

KW - integrative mindset

KW - scale development

KW - construct validation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075042175&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1027/1015-5759/a000548

DO - 10.1027/1015-5759/a000548

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 36

SP - 740

EP - 747

JO - European Journal of Psychological Assessment

JF - European Journal of Psychological Assessment

SN - 1015-5759

IS - 5

M1 - a000548

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Forschende

  1. Jana Hüttmann

Publikationen

  1. Mapping international inspections
  2. Sustainable Conference Organizing: Practices and Impact
  3. Connecting curricula and competence through student learning journeys
  4. Nanoindentation of Poly(Ethylene Oxide) Nanofibers by Atomic Force Microscope (AFM)
  5. Words and deeds
  6. Äpfel mit Birnen vergleichen
  7. Payments for ecosystem services – for efficiency and for equity?
  8. How Participatory Should Environmental Governance Be?
  9. Differenzen in der pädagogischen Praxis
  10. Changing learning environments at university?
  11. Explaining age and gender differences in employment rates
  12. Nonprofit-Organizations and Society
  13. Beyond stereotypes
  14. Klassensprachen - Some Preliminary Theses
  15. The topographical imagination: space and organization theory
  16. The role of human resource practices for including persons with disabilities in the workforce
  17. Battery as a mediating technology of organization
  18. The Importance of Being First
  19. Data retention in the European Union
  20. Utopian Hacks
  21. Жизнь вне изоляции.
  22. Plant functional trait response to environmental drivers across European temperate forest understorey communities
  23. Systematic literature review of flipping classroom in mathematics
  24. Verbund-Simulation - Strategic Planning and Optimization of Integrated Production Networks
  25. Minimal conditions of motor inductions of approach-avoidance states
  26. Zootechnologies.
  27. Effect of filler materials on the tensile properties and fracture toughness of laser beam welded AA2198 joints under different ageing conditions
  28. Ethnic Differences in Context: Does Emotional Conflict Mediate the Effects of Both Team- and Individual-Level Ethnic Diversity on Emotional Strain?
  29. The aftermath of colonization and forms of transactions between agriculture and industry - Exchange relations between industrialized and developing countries in the world economy of tobacco
  30. Lu Märten
  31. Conclusion
  32. Gesundheitswissenschaft
  33. Verhandeln
  34. The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard as a Framework to Link Environmental Management Accounting with Strategic Management
  35. “Fighting corruption” or “fighting the corrupt elite”? Politicizing corruption within and beyond the populist divide
  36. Correction to
  37. The development and future of sexuality
  38. #instacops
  39. Socio-cultural differences in understanding and development of corporate social responsibility in Germany and Croatia
  40. Reasons to leave shiftwork and psychological and psychosomatic complaints of former shiftworkers
  41. Exposing the machinic present