Topologies of judgement: Arendt, Schürmann, and Shell on the Politics of Kantian sensus communis
Publikation: Beiträge in Sammelwerken › Kapitel › begutachtet
Standard
Possibilities of Place in Continental Thought: Critique, Politics, Philosophy. Hrsg. / Jussi Palmusaari; Nicolas Schneider. London: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc., 2024. S. 81-104.
Publikation: Beiträge in Sammelwerken › Kapitel › begutachtet
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - CHAP
T1 - Topologies of judgement
T2 - Arendt, Schürmann, and Shell on the Politics of Kantian sensus communis
AU - Schneider, Nicolas
PY - 2024/10/31
Y1 - 2024/10/31
N2 - Reiner Schürmann, in an essay engaging with Michel Foucault’s critique of the modern subject, proposes an ‘anarchistic subject’ to struggle against what he calls the ‘law of social totalization’ that governs modern society. This anarchistic subject is likely to face two connected questions. First, the question of the standpoint or place of resistance: how does the anarchistic subject situate itself in relation to the historical and conceptual determinations of space and time imposed by this society? Second, a question of practice: how is its anarchistic practice connected to hegemonic forms of thinking and acting or, more specifically, of judging in this society? Both questions can be seen to pertain to the problem of orientation, respectively, in space and time and in thinking and acting. To consider the questions of place and judgement together, this chapter explores some variations on the Kantian topology of judgement as it emerges from the Critique of Judgement (CJ) and investigates the role sensus communis can play in this anarchistic struggle....
AB - Reiner Schürmann, in an essay engaging with Michel Foucault’s critique of the modern subject, proposes an ‘anarchistic subject’ to struggle against what he calls the ‘law of social totalization’ that governs modern society. This anarchistic subject is likely to face two connected questions. First, the question of the standpoint or place of resistance: how does the anarchistic subject situate itself in relation to the historical and conceptual determinations of space and time imposed by this society? Second, a question of practice: how is its anarchistic practice connected to hegemonic forms of thinking and acting or, more specifically, of judging in this society? Both questions can be seen to pertain to the problem of orientation, respectively, in space and time and in thinking and acting. To consider the questions of place and judgement together, this chapter explores some variations on the Kantian topology of judgement as it emerges from the Critique of Judgement (CJ) and investigates the role sensus communis can play in this anarchistic struggle....
KW - Media and communication studies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85205560387&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5040/9781350282674.ch-4
DO - 10.5040/9781350282674.ch-4
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:85205560387
SN - 9781350282643
SP - 81
EP - 104
BT - Possibilities of Place in Continental Thought
A2 - Palmusaari, Jussi
A2 - Schneider, Nicolas
PB - Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.
CY - London
ER -