Three Questions about Informal Regulation

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Three Questions about Informal Regulation. / Tams, Christian J.
in: AJIL Unbound, Jahrgang 112, 01.01.2018, S. 108-112.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Tams CJ. Three Questions about Informal Regulation. AJIL Unbound. 2018 Jan 1;112:108-112. doi: 10.1017/aju.2018.40

Bibtex

@article{74fcef65899346d29b2797df4bb6e2ad,
title = "Three Questions about Informal Regulation",
abstract = "In the grand debates of international law, the jus ad bellum is often proclaimed dead, and just as often praised as the cornerstone of the contemporary legal order. Both perspectives tend to ignore that the jus ad bellum is not static, but a body of law that states adjust over time. In an important contribution, Monica Hakimi proposes to look at one particular aspect of such adjustment, a concept she frames as informal regulation through Security Council action. This essay engages with Hakimi's approach. It inquires whether this approach is as informal as Hakimi suggests, and asks whether informal regulation - rather than constituting a new category of state activities to study - is not already part of conventional approaches to the jus ad bellum. Proceeding from Hakimi's analysis, the comment assesses whether there is room for informal regulation beyond the Security Council.",
keywords = "Law",
author = "Tams, {Christian J.}",
year = "2018",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/aju.2018.40",
language = "English",
volume = "112",
pages = "108--112",
journal = "AJIL Unbound",
issn = "2398-7723",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Three Questions about Informal Regulation

AU - Tams, Christian J.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - In the grand debates of international law, the jus ad bellum is often proclaimed dead, and just as often praised as the cornerstone of the contemporary legal order. Both perspectives tend to ignore that the jus ad bellum is not static, but a body of law that states adjust over time. In an important contribution, Monica Hakimi proposes to look at one particular aspect of such adjustment, a concept she frames as informal regulation through Security Council action. This essay engages with Hakimi's approach. It inquires whether this approach is as informal as Hakimi suggests, and asks whether informal regulation - rather than constituting a new category of state activities to study - is not already part of conventional approaches to the jus ad bellum. Proceeding from Hakimi's analysis, the comment assesses whether there is room for informal regulation beyond the Security Council.

AB - In the grand debates of international law, the jus ad bellum is often proclaimed dead, and just as often praised as the cornerstone of the contemporary legal order. Both perspectives tend to ignore that the jus ad bellum is not static, but a body of law that states adjust over time. In an important contribution, Monica Hakimi proposes to look at one particular aspect of such adjustment, a concept she frames as informal regulation through Security Council action. This essay engages with Hakimi's approach. It inquires whether this approach is as informal as Hakimi suggests, and asks whether informal regulation - rather than constituting a new category of state activities to study - is not already part of conventional approaches to the jus ad bellum. Proceeding from Hakimi's analysis, the comment assesses whether there is room for informal regulation beyond the Security Council.

KW - Law

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092170569&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/aju.2018.40

DO - 10.1017/aju.2018.40

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85092170569

VL - 112

SP - 108

EP - 112

JO - AJIL Unbound

JF - AJIL Unbound

SN - 2398-7723

ER -

DOI