The snow crab dispute on the continental shelf of Svalbard: A case-study on options for the settlement of international fisheries access disputes
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet
Standard
in: International Community Law Review, Jahrgang 22, Nr. 3-4, 20.08.2020, S. 455-470.
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - The snow crab dispute on the continental shelf of Svalbard
T2 - A case-study on options for the settlement of international fisheries access disputes
AU - Schatz, Valentin J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2020
PY - 2020/8/20
Y1 - 2020/8/20
N2 - Disputes concerning access to fisheries within national jurisdiction can be drivers of illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing. International courts and tribunals may play an important role in settling certain categories of fisheries access disputes and in clarifying the applicable legal framework. This article explores international dispute settlement options for the dispute between the European Union (EU) and Norway over access to the snow crab fishery in Svalbard’s waters as an example of a complex fisheries access dispute. In doing so, it considers the potential and limits of: 1) the compulsory dispute settlement mechanism under Section 2 of Part XV of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and 2) litigation before the International Court of Justice (ICJ).
AB - Disputes concerning access to fisheries within national jurisdiction can be drivers of illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing. International courts and tribunals may play an important role in settling certain categories of fisheries access disputes and in clarifying the applicable legal framework. This article explores international dispute settlement options for the dispute between the European Union (EU) and Norway over access to the snow crab fishery in Svalbard’s waters as an example of a complex fisheries access dispute. In doing so, it considers the potential and limits of: 1) the compulsory dispute settlement mechanism under Section 2 of Part XV of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and 2) litigation before the International Court of Justice (ICJ).
KW - Fisheries disputes
KW - International Court of Justice
KW - Law of the sea
KW - Snow crab
KW - Spitsbergen Treaty
KW - UNCLOS dispute settlement
KW - Law
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85093920731&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/5cf90a4d-c8b9-350f-8eed-af7f44655d78/
U2 - 10.1163/18719732-12341442
DO - 10.1163/18719732-12341442
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:85093920731
VL - 22
SP - 455
EP - 470
JO - International Community Law Review
JF - International Community Law Review
SN - 1871-9740
IS - 3-4
ER -