The Re-construction of Organization Studies: Wrestling with Incommensurability

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschung

Standard

The Re-construction of Organization Studies: Wrestling with Incommensurability. / McKinley, William; Mone, Mark A.
in: Organization, Jahrgang 5, Nr. 2, 2, 01.05.1998, S. 169-189.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

McKinley W, Mone MA. The Re-construction of Organization Studies: Wrestling with Incommensurability. Organization. 1998 Mai 1;5(2):169-189. 2. doi: 10.1177/135050849852002

Bibtex

@article{7236537d3c5442cab98e6118c777da54,
title = "The Re-construction of Organization Studies: Wrestling with Incommensurability",
abstract = "This paper proposes a 're-construction' of organization studies in order to deal with the chronic incommensurability that characterizes the discipline. The paper begins by discussing the issue of incommensurability between organization studies schools of thought, arguing that it represents a significant problem with which the field must cope. Ambiguity of the key constructs that form the building blocks of organization studies schools is identified as one major reason for persistent inter-school incommensurability. To help deal with the problem, we recommend the creation of a dictionary that would include democratically produced definitions of key organization studies constructs. The procedures used by the Financial Accounting Standards Board to develop new accounting standards are presented as a possible model for the dictionary-building process. The role of the dictionary in reducing inter-school incommensurability is discussed, and possible disadvantages considered. While the need to formally create construct definitions is symptomatic of the low paradigm development of organization studies, the dictionary is envisioned as a tool for increasing the future paradigm development of the field.",
keywords = "Management studies",
author = "William McKinley and Mone, {Mark A.}",
year = "1998",
month = may,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/135050849852002",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "169--189",
journal = "Organization",
issn = "1350-5084",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Re-construction of Organization Studies

T2 - Wrestling with Incommensurability

AU - McKinley, William

AU - Mone, Mark A.

PY - 1998/5/1

Y1 - 1998/5/1

N2 - This paper proposes a 're-construction' of organization studies in order to deal with the chronic incommensurability that characterizes the discipline. The paper begins by discussing the issue of incommensurability between organization studies schools of thought, arguing that it represents a significant problem with which the field must cope. Ambiguity of the key constructs that form the building blocks of organization studies schools is identified as one major reason for persistent inter-school incommensurability. To help deal with the problem, we recommend the creation of a dictionary that would include democratically produced definitions of key organization studies constructs. The procedures used by the Financial Accounting Standards Board to develop new accounting standards are presented as a possible model for the dictionary-building process. The role of the dictionary in reducing inter-school incommensurability is discussed, and possible disadvantages considered. While the need to formally create construct definitions is symptomatic of the low paradigm development of organization studies, the dictionary is envisioned as a tool for increasing the future paradigm development of the field.

AB - This paper proposes a 're-construction' of organization studies in order to deal with the chronic incommensurability that characterizes the discipline. The paper begins by discussing the issue of incommensurability between organization studies schools of thought, arguing that it represents a significant problem with which the field must cope. Ambiguity of the key constructs that form the building blocks of organization studies schools is identified as one major reason for persistent inter-school incommensurability. To help deal with the problem, we recommend the creation of a dictionary that would include democratically produced definitions of key organization studies constructs. The procedures used by the Financial Accounting Standards Board to develop new accounting standards are presented as a possible model for the dictionary-building process. The role of the dictionary in reducing inter-school incommensurability is discussed, and possible disadvantages considered. While the need to formally create construct definitions is symptomatic of the low paradigm development of organization studies, the dictionary is envisioned as a tool for increasing the future paradigm development of the field.

KW - Management studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=20444423885&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/98d09b62-60bd-3155-8f33-508446da876d/

U2 - 10.1177/135050849852002

DO - 10.1177/135050849852002

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 5

SP - 169

EP - 189

JO - Organization

JF - Organization

SN - 1350-5084

IS - 2

M1 - 2

ER -

DOI