The Problem of Institutional Fit: Uncovering Patterns with Boosted Decision Trees

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

The Problem of Institutional Fit: Uncovering Patterns with Boosted Decision Trees. / Epstein, Graham; Apetrei, Cristina I.; Baggio, Jacopo et al.
in: International Journal of the Commons, Jahrgang 18, Nr. 1, 10.01.2024, S. 1-16.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

Epstein, G, Apetrei, CI, Baggio, J, Chawla, S, Cumming, G, Gurney, G, Morrison, T, Unnikrishnan, H & Tomas, SV 2024, 'The Problem of Institutional Fit: Uncovering Patterns with Boosted Decision Trees', International Journal of the Commons, Jg. 18, Nr. 1, S. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.1226

APA

Epstein, G., Apetrei, C. I., Baggio, J., Chawla, S., Cumming, G., Gurney, G., Morrison, T., Unnikrishnan, H., & Tomas, S. V. (2024). The Problem of Institutional Fit: Uncovering Patterns with Boosted Decision Trees. International Journal of the Commons, 18(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.1226

Vancouver

Epstein G, Apetrei CI, Baggio J, Chawla S, Cumming G, Gurney G et al. The Problem of Institutional Fit: Uncovering Patterns with Boosted Decision Trees. International Journal of the Commons. 2024 Jan 10;18(1):1-16. doi: 10.5334/ijc.1226

Bibtex

@article{aa28a263d6ee48abb709517ca3543f7e,
title = "The Problem of Institutional Fit: Uncovering Patterns with Boosted Decision Trees",
abstract = "Complex social-ecological contexts play an important role in shaping the types of institutions that groups use to manage resources, and the effectiveness of those institutions in achieving social and environmental objectives. However, despite widespread acknowledgment that “context matters”, progress in generalising how complex contexts shape institutions and outcomes has been slow. This is partly because large numbers of potentially influential variables and non-linearities confound traditional statistical methods. Here we use boosted decision trees – one of a growing portfolio of machine learning tools – to examine relationships between contexts, institutions, and their performance. More specifically we draw upon data from the International Forest Resources and Institutions (IFRI) program to analyze (i) the contexts in which groups successfully self-organize to develop rules for the use of forest resources (local rulemaking), and (ii) the contexts in which local rulemaking is associated with successful ecological outcomes. The results reveal an unfortunate divergence between the contexts in which local rulemaking tends to be found and the contexts in which it contributes to successful outcomes. These findings and our overall approach present a potentially fruitful opportunity to further advance theories of institutional fit and inform the development of policies and practices tailored to different contexts and desired outcomes.",
keywords = "Collective action, Community-based management, Context, Environmental governance, Institutional fit, Machine learning, Environmental Governance",
author = "Graham Epstein and Apetrei, {Cristina I.} and Jacopo Baggio and Sivee Chawla and Graeme Cumming and Georgina Gurney and Tiffany Morrison and Hita Unnikrishnan and Tomas, {Sergio Villamayor}",
note = "Funding Information: This work was supported by the National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (SESYNC) through funding received from the National Science Foundation (DBI-1639145). GE would to acknowledge support from the Canada First Research Excellence Fund under the Global Water Futures Programme. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024 The Author(s).",
year = "2024",
month = jan,
day = "10",
doi = "10.5334/ijc.1226",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "1--16",
journal = "International Journal of the Commons",
issn = "1875-0281",
publisher = "International Association for the Study of the Commons",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Problem of Institutional Fit

T2 - Uncovering Patterns with Boosted Decision Trees

AU - Epstein, Graham

AU - Apetrei, Cristina I.

AU - Baggio, Jacopo

AU - Chawla, Sivee

AU - Cumming, Graeme

AU - Gurney, Georgina

AU - Morrison, Tiffany

AU - Unnikrishnan, Hita

AU - Tomas, Sergio Villamayor

N1 - Funding Information: This work was supported by the National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (SESYNC) through funding received from the National Science Foundation (DBI-1639145). GE would to acknowledge support from the Canada First Research Excellence Fund under the Global Water Futures Programme. Publisher Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s).

PY - 2024/1/10

Y1 - 2024/1/10

N2 - Complex social-ecological contexts play an important role in shaping the types of institutions that groups use to manage resources, and the effectiveness of those institutions in achieving social and environmental objectives. However, despite widespread acknowledgment that “context matters”, progress in generalising how complex contexts shape institutions and outcomes has been slow. This is partly because large numbers of potentially influential variables and non-linearities confound traditional statistical methods. Here we use boosted decision trees – one of a growing portfolio of machine learning tools – to examine relationships between contexts, institutions, and their performance. More specifically we draw upon data from the International Forest Resources and Institutions (IFRI) program to analyze (i) the contexts in which groups successfully self-organize to develop rules for the use of forest resources (local rulemaking), and (ii) the contexts in which local rulemaking is associated with successful ecological outcomes. The results reveal an unfortunate divergence between the contexts in which local rulemaking tends to be found and the contexts in which it contributes to successful outcomes. These findings and our overall approach present a potentially fruitful opportunity to further advance theories of institutional fit and inform the development of policies and practices tailored to different contexts and desired outcomes.

AB - Complex social-ecological contexts play an important role in shaping the types of institutions that groups use to manage resources, and the effectiveness of those institutions in achieving social and environmental objectives. However, despite widespread acknowledgment that “context matters”, progress in generalising how complex contexts shape institutions and outcomes has been slow. This is partly because large numbers of potentially influential variables and non-linearities confound traditional statistical methods. Here we use boosted decision trees – one of a growing portfolio of machine learning tools – to examine relationships between contexts, institutions, and their performance. More specifically we draw upon data from the International Forest Resources and Institutions (IFRI) program to analyze (i) the contexts in which groups successfully self-organize to develop rules for the use of forest resources (local rulemaking), and (ii) the contexts in which local rulemaking is associated with successful ecological outcomes. The results reveal an unfortunate divergence between the contexts in which local rulemaking tends to be found and the contexts in which it contributes to successful outcomes. These findings and our overall approach present a potentially fruitful opportunity to further advance theories of institutional fit and inform the development of policies and practices tailored to different contexts and desired outcomes.

KW - Collective action

KW - Community-based management

KW - Context

KW - Environmental governance

KW - Institutional fit

KW - Machine learning

KW - Environmental Governance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85183415270&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5334/ijc.1226

DO - 10.5334/ijc.1226

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85183415270

VL - 18

SP - 1

EP - 16

JO - International Journal of the Commons

JF - International Journal of the Commons

SN - 1875-0281

IS - 1

ER -

DOI