The European Union’s External Trade and Investment Policy Post-Lisbon: Competence, Procedure and Scope of Action

Gesa Kübek

doi:10.1007/978-94-6265-391-7_5

The European Union’s External Trade and Investment Policy Post-Lisbon: Competence, Procedure and Scope of Action

Publikation: Beiträge in Sammelwerken › Aufsätze in Sammelwerken › Forschung

Standard

The European Union’s External Trade and Investment Policy Post-Lisbon: Competence, Procedure and Scope of Action. / Kübek, Gesa.
EU External Action in International Economic Law: Recent Developments. Hrsg. / Mads Andenas; Luca Pantaleo; Matthew Happold; Christina Contartese. Den Haag: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2020. S. 93-120.

Publikation: Beiträge in Sammelwerken › Aufsätze in Sammelwerken › Forschung

Harvard

Kübek, G 2020, The European Union’s External Trade and Investment Policy Post-Lisbon: Competence, Procedure and Scope of Action. in M Andenas, L Pantaleo, M Happold & C Contartese (Hrsg.), EU External Action in International Economic Law: Recent Developments. T.M.C. Asser Press, Den Haag, S. 93-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-391-7_5

APA

Kübek, G. (2020). The European Union’s External Trade and Investment Policy Post-Lisbon: Competence, Procedure and Scope of Action. In M. Andenas, L. Pantaleo, M. Happold, & C. Contartese (Hrsg.), EU External Action in International Economic Law: Recent Developments (S. 93-120). T.M.C. Asser Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-391-7_5

Vancouver

Kübek G. The European Union’s External Trade and Investment Policy Post-Lisbon: Competence, Procedure and Scope of Action. in Andenas M, Pantaleo L, Happold M, Contartese C, Hrsg., EU External Action in International Economic Law: Recent Developments. Den Haag: T.M.C. Asser Press. 2020. S. 93-120 doi: 10.1007/978-94-6265-391-7_5

Bibtex

@inbook{221bc65c9d51457f824b1d1a520f7456,

title = "The European Union{\textquoteright}s External Trade and Investment Policy Post-Lisbon: Competence, Procedure and Scope of Action",

abstract = "The power and capacity of the European Union (EU) to make trade and investment agreements post-Lisbon has been shaped through a series of recent decision by the Court of Justice of the European Union, including especially Opinions 2/15 and 1/17. The present chapter aims to illustrate the resulting ex ante review of the EU{\textquoteright}s competence in the field of trade and investment, the legal instruments providing that review, and its effects on the procedure and design of EU trade and investment agreements. In short, it looks at where we are now, by what means we got here, and how we might go on.",

keywords = "Law, EU external competence, EU treaty-making power, opinion 2/15, Opinion 1/17, multilevel governance, trade policy",

author = "Gesa K{\"u}bek",

year = "2020",

month = sep,

day = "26",

doi = "10.1007/978-94-6265-391-7_5",

language = "English",

isbn = "978-94-6265-390-0",

pages = "93--120",

editor = "Andenas, {Mads } and Luca Pantaleo and Matthew Happold and Christina Contartese",

booktitle = "EU External Action in International Economic Law",

publisher = "T.M.C. Asser Press",

address = "Netherlands",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - The European Union’s External Trade and Investment Policy Post-Lisbon

T2 - Competence, Procedure and Scope of Action

AU - Kübek, Gesa

PY - 2020/9/26

Y1 - 2020/9/26

N2 - The power and capacity of the European Union (EU) to make trade and investment agreements post-Lisbon has been shaped through a series of recent decision by the Court of Justice of the European Union, including especially Opinions 2/15 and 1/17. The present chapter aims to illustrate the resulting ex ante review of the EU’s competence in the field of trade and investment, the legal instruments providing that review, and its effects on the procedure and design of EU trade and investment agreements. In short, it looks at where we are now, by what means we got here, and how we might go on.

AB - The power and capacity of the European Union (EU) to make trade and investment agreements post-Lisbon has been shaped through a series of recent decision by the Court of Justice of the European Union, including especially Opinions 2/15 and 1/17. The present chapter aims to illustrate the resulting ex ante review of the EU’s competence in the field of trade and investment, the legal instruments providing that review, and its effects on the procedure and design of EU trade and investment agreements. In short, it looks at where we are now, by what means we got here, and how we might go on.

KW - Law

KW - EU external competence

KW - EU treaty-making power

KW - opinion 2/15

KW - Opinion 1/17

KW - multilevel governance

KW - trade policy

U2 - 10.1007/978-94-6265-391-7_5

DO - 10.1007/978-94-6265-391-7_5

M3 - Contributions to collected editions/anthologies

SN - 978-94-6265-390-0

SP - 93

EP - 120

BT - EU External Action in International Economic Law

A2 - Andenas, Mads

A2 - Pantaleo, Luca

A2 - Happold, Matthew

A2 - Contartese, Christina

PB - T.M.C. Asser Press

CY - Den Haag

ER -

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-391-7_5
Endgültige, publizierte Fassung

The European Union’s External Trade and Investment Policy Post-Lisbon: Competence, Procedure and Scope of Action

Standard

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

RIS

Weitere Publikationen dieser Person(en)

Autonomy and international investment agreements after Opinion 1/17

Facultative Mixity and the European Union’s Trade and Investment Agreements

CETA's Investment Court System and the Autonomy of EU Law: Insights from the Hearing in Opinion 1/17

Redefining the boundaries of the Common Commercial Policy and the ERTA doctrine: Opinion 3/15, Marrakesh Treaty

The Non-Ratification Scenario: Legal and Practical Responses to Mixed Treaty Rejection by Member States

DOI