The environmental and economic effects of European emissions trading

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

The environmental and economic effects of European emissions trading. / Kemfert, Claudia; Kohlhaas, Michael; Truong, Truong et al.

in: Climate Policy, Jahrgang 6, Nr. 4, 01.01.2006, S. 441-455.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Kemfert C, Kohlhaas M, Truong T, Protsenko A. The environmental and economic effects of European emissions trading. Climate Policy. 2006 Jan 1;6(4):441-455. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2006.9685612

Bibtex

@article{6e4ead67e2da492b8f1e59a6eb119e71,
title = "The environmental and economic effects of European emissions trading",
abstract = "In this article, we analyse the effects of emissions trading in Europe, with special reference to Germany. We look at the value of the flexibility gained by trading compared to fixed quotas. The analysis is undertaken with a modified version of the GTAP-E model using the latest GTAP version 6 database. It is based on the national allocation plans (NAP) as submitted to and approved by the EU. We find that, in a regional emissions trading scheme, Germany, Great Britain and the Czech Republic are the main sellers of emissions permits, while Belgium, Denmark, Finland and Sweden are the main buyers. The welfare gains from regional emissions trading—for the trading sectors only—are largest for Belgium, Denmark and Great Britain; smaller for Finland and Sweden, and smallest for Germany and other regions. When we take into account the economy-wide and terms-of-trade effects of emissions trading, however, (negative) terms-of-trade effects can offset the (positive) allocative efficiency gains for the cases of the Netherlands and Italy, while all other regions end up with positive net welfare gains. All regions, however, experienced increases in real GDP as a result of regional emissions trading.",
keywords = "Economics, Computational general equilibrium, Economic assessment, European emissions trading",
author = "Claudia Kemfert and Michael Kohlhaas and Truong Truong and Artem Protsenko",
note = "Funding Information: 1 Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on EU policies and measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions: Towards a European Climate Change Programme (ECCP), Com(2000)88 final.",
year = "2006",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/14693062.2006.9685612",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "441--455",
journal = "Climate Policy",
issn = "1469-3062",
publisher = "Earthscan Publications Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The environmental and economic effects of European emissions trading

AU - Kemfert, Claudia

AU - Kohlhaas, Michael

AU - Truong, Truong

AU - Protsenko, Artem

N1 - Funding Information: 1 Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on EU policies and measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions: Towards a European Climate Change Programme (ECCP), Com(2000)88 final.

PY - 2006/1/1

Y1 - 2006/1/1

N2 - In this article, we analyse the effects of emissions trading in Europe, with special reference to Germany. We look at the value of the flexibility gained by trading compared to fixed quotas. The analysis is undertaken with a modified version of the GTAP-E model using the latest GTAP version 6 database. It is based on the national allocation plans (NAP) as submitted to and approved by the EU. We find that, in a regional emissions trading scheme, Germany, Great Britain and the Czech Republic are the main sellers of emissions permits, while Belgium, Denmark, Finland and Sweden are the main buyers. The welfare gains from regional emissions trading—for the trading sectors only—are largest for Belgium, Denmark and Great Britain; smaller for Finland and Sweden, and smallest for Germany and other regions. When we take into account the economy-wide and terms-of-trade effects of emissions trading, however, (negative) terms-of-trade effects can offset the (positive) allocative efficiency gains for the cases of the Netherlands and Italy, while all other regions end up with positive net welfare gains. All regions, however, experienced increases in real GDP as a result of regional emissions trading.

AB - In this article, we analyse the effects of emissions trading in Europe, with special reference to Germany. We look at the value of the flexibility gained by trading compared to fixed quotas. The analysis is undertaken with a modified version of the GTAP-E model using the latest GTAP version 6 database. It is based on the national allocation plans (NAP) as submitted to and approved by the EU. We find that, in a regional emissions trading scheme, Germany, Great Britain and the Czech Republic are the main sellers of emissions permits, while Belgium, Denmark, Finland and Sweden are the main buyers. The welfare gains from regional emissions trading—for the trading sectors only—are largest for Belgium, Denmark and Great Britain; smaller for Finland and Sweden, and smallest for Germany and other regions. When we take into account the economy-wide and terms-of-trade effects of emissions trading, however, (negative) terms-of-trade effects can offset the (positive) allocative efficiency gains for the cases of the Netherlands and Italy, while all other regions end up with positive net welfare gains. All regions, however, experienced increases in real GDP as a result of regional emissions trading.

KW - Economics

KW - Computational general equilibrium

KW - Economic assessment

KW - European emissions trading

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34249688639&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/f21f1269-e31e-3a28-9bbe-9002d4b4b9d5/

U2 - 10.1080/14693062.2006.9685612

DO - 10.1080/14693062.2006.9685612

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:34249688639

VL - 6

SP - 441

EP - 455

JO - Climate Policy

JF - Climate Policy

SN - 1469-3062

IS - 4

ER -

DOI