Technological governance - technological citizenship?

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenAufsätze in SammelwerkenForschung

Standard

Technological governance - technological citizenship? / Saretzki, Thomas.

Participatory governance in multi-level context: Concepts And Experience. Hrsg. / Hubert Heinelt. Leverkusen : Verlag Leske + Budrich, 2002. S. 83-105.

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenAufsätze in SammelwerkenForschung

Harvard

Saretzki, T 2002, Technological governance - technological citizenship? in H Heinelt (Hrsg.), Participatory governance in multi-level context: Concepts And Experience. Verlag Leske + Budrich, Leverkusen, S. 83-105. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-11005-7_5

APA

Saretzki, T. (2002). Technological governance - technological citizenship? in H. Heinelt (Hrsg.), Participatory governance in multi-level context: Concepts And Experience (S. 83-105). Verlag Leske + Budrich. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-11005-7_5

Vancouver

Saretzki T. Technological governance - technological citizenship? in Heinelt H, Hrsg., Participatory governance in multi-level context: Concepts And Experience. Leverkusen: Verlag Leske + Budrich. 2002. S. 83-105 doi: 10.1007/978-3-663-11005-7_5

Bibtex

@inbook{76bddc6dcc244cf9a6f4fff3cb736b75,
title = "Technological governance - technological citizenship?",
abstract = "Technological change poses serious challenges to the idea of democratic self-governance of modern society. In recent decades, discussions on the relations between technology and democracy have intensified, especially when new basic technologies have been invented and its impacts became an issue on the public agenda (Goggin 1986, Sclove 1995). In the seventies and early eighties, most commentators worried about the undermining of democracy in a technological society and called upon the state to guarantee democratic control of technology. However, in analysing the capacity of the state and its bureaucratic apparatus to steer technology according to politically defined goals, political scientists became more and more sceptical. Given the rapid and fundamental changes in the societal conditions affecting state action, does the state still have the capacity to steer technological change effectively and efficiently? Most analysts concluded that the traditional model of steering technology through a hierarchical, centralised and bureaucratic democratic state was in serious trouble, both theoretically and practically (Grimmer et al. 1992, Martinsen/Simonis 1995).",
keywords = "Politics, B{\"u}rgerbeteiligung , Technisierung , Entwicklung , Political Community, Civic Virtue, Public Deliberation, Comprehensive Concept, Participatory Governance",
author = "Thomas Saretzki",
note = "Literaturverz. S. 103 - 105",
year = "2002",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-663-11005-7_5",
language = "English",
isbn = "3810036145",
pages = "83--105",
editor = "Hubert Heinelt",
booktitle = "Participatory governance in multi-level context",
publisher = "Verlag Leske + Budrich",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Technological governance - technological citizenship?

AU - Saretzki, Thomas

N1 - Literaturverz. S. 103 - 105

PY - 2002/1/1

Y1 - 2002/1/1

N2 - Technological change poses serious challenges to the idea of democratic self-governance of modern society. In recent decades, discussions on the relations between technology and democracy have intensified, especially when new basic technologies have been invented and its impacts became an issue on the public agenda (Goggin 1986, Sclove 1995). In the seventies and early eighties, most commentators worried about the undermining of democracy in a technological society and called upon the state to guarantee democratic control of technology. However, in analysing the capacity of the state and its bureaucratic apparatus to steer technology according to politically defined goals, political scientists became more and more sceptical. Given the rapid and fundamental changes in the societal conditions affecting state action, does the state still have the capacity to steer technological change effectively and efficiently? Most analysts concluded that the traditional model of steering technology through a hierarchical, centralised and bureaucratic democratic state was in serious trouble, both theoretically and practically (Grimmer et al. 1992, Martinsen/Simonis 1995).

AB - Technological change poses serious challenges to the idea of democratic self-governance of modern society. In recent decades, discussions on the relations between technology and democracy have intensified, especially when new basic technologies have been invented and its impacts became an issue on the public agenda (Goggin 1986, Sclove 1995). In the seventies and early eighties, most commentators worried about the undermining of democracy in a technological society and called upon the state to guarantee democratic control of technology. However, in analysing the capacity of the state and its bureaucratic apparatus to steer technology according to politically defined goals, political scientists became more and more sceptical. Given the rapid and fundamental changes in the societal conditions affecting state action, does the state still have the capacity to steer technological change effectively and efficiently? Most analysts concluded that the traditional model of steering technology through a hierarchical, centralised and bureaucratic democratic state was in serious trouble, both theoretically and practically (Grimmer et al. 1992, Martinsen/Simonis 1995).

KW - Politics

KW - Bürgerbeteiligung

KW - Technisierung

KW - Entwicklung

KW - Political Community

KW - Civic Virtue

KW - Public Deliberation

KW - Comprehensive Concept

KW - Participatory Governance

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/49299e5b-ce4b-3da1-987f-8dd279aa079e/

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-663-11005-7_5

DO - 10.1007/978-3-663-11005-7_5

M3 - Contributions to collected editions/anthologies

SN - 3810036145

SN - 978-3-8100-3614-8

SP - 83

EP - 105

BT - Participatory governance in multi-level context

A2 - Heinelt, Hubert

PB - Verlag Leske + Budrich

CY - Leverkusen

ER -

DOI