Sustainable board governance and environmental performance: European evidence

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Sustainable board governance and environmental performance: European evidence. / Velte, Patrick.
in: Business Strategy and the Environment, Jahrgang 33, Nr. 4, 05.2024, S. 3397-3421.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{8193a85398d74bb0945c15209af591c4,
title = "Sustainable board governance and environmental performance: European evidence",
abstract = "The ambitious EU Green Deal project is linked to extensive regulations on sustainability reporting, sustainable finance, and sustainable corporate governance. With increasing awareness of the impact of sustainable board governance on corporate environmental performance, our paper includes an innovative sustainable board governance score, reflecting significant board attributes. The question arises whether the combined effect of sustainable board measures, based on (1) sustainability board committees, (2) a critical mass of female board members, and (3) sustainability-related executive compensation, influences environmental performance and its main sub-pillars according to the EU Taxonomy Regulation. Based on stakeholder and critical mass theories, our study empirically addresses the impact of sustainable board governance on environmental performance and five sub-pillars (carbon, emissions, biodiversity, resource use, and water performance). Using a sample of 2630 firm-year observations from 2014 to 21, we find that sustainable board governance significantly improves environmental performance and the related sub-pillars, except for biodiversity and water performance. Our findings are robust to robustness analyses and endogeneity checks. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to rely on the combined effect of sustainable board attributes and its impact of environmental performance and its major sub-pillars. Thus, this study provides new insight into the relationship between corporate governance and environmental performance in the EU capital market to guide researchers, business practice, and regulatory bodies.",
keywords = "board gender diversity, critical mass theory, CSR committees, CSR-related compensation, environmental performance, sustainable corporate governance, Management studies",
author = "Patrick Velte",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023 The Author. Business Strategy and The Environment published by ERP Environment and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",
year = "2024",
month = may,
doi = "10.1002/bse.3654",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "3397--3421",
journal = "Business Strategy and the Environment",
issn = "0964-4733",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sustainable board governance and environmental performance

T2 - European evidence

AU - Velte, Patrick

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Author. Business Strategy and The Environment published by ERP Environment and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

PY - 2024/5

Y1 - 2024/5

N2 - The ambitious EU Green Deal project is linked to extensive regulations on sustainability reporting, sustainable finance, and sustainable corporate governance. With increasing awareness of the impact of sustainable board governance on corporate environmental performance, our paper includes an innovative sustainable board governance score, reflecting significant board attributes. The question arises whether the combined effect of sustainable board measures, based on (1) sustainability board committees, (2) a critical mass of female board members, and (3) sustainability-related executive compensation, influences environmental performance and its main sub-pillars according to the EU Taxonomy Regulation. Based on stakeholder and critical mass theories, our study empirically addresses the impact of sustainable board governance on environmental performance and five sub-pillars (carbon, emissions, biodiversity, resource use, and water performance). Using a sample of 2630 firm-year observations from 2014 to 21, we find that sustainable board governance significantly improves environmental performance and the related sub-pillars, except for biodiversity and water performance. Our findings are robust to robustness analyses and endogeneity checks. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to rely on the combined effect of sustainable board attributes and its impact of environmental performance and its major sub-pillars. Thus, this study provides new insight into the relationship between corporate governance and environmental performance in the EU capital market to guide researchers, business practice, and regulatory bodies.

AB - The ambitious EU Green Deal project is linked to extensive regulations on sustainability reporting, sustainable finance, and sustainable corporate governance. With increasing awareness of the impact of sustainable board governance on corporate environmental performance, our paper includes an innovative sustainable board governance score, reflecting significant board attributes. The question arises whether the combined effect of sustainable board measures, based on (1) sustainability board committees, (2) a critical mass of female board members, and (3) sustainability-related executive compensation, influences environmental performance and its main sub-pillars according to the EU Taxonomy Regulation. Based on stakeholder and critical mass theories, our study empirically addresses the impact of sustainable board governance on environmental performance and five sub-pillars (carbon, emissions, biodiversity, resource use, and water performance). Using a sample of 2630 firm-year observations from 2014 to 21, we find that sustainable board governance significantly improves environmental performance and the related sub-pillars, except for biodiversity and water performance. Our findings are robust to robustness analyses and endogeneity checks. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to rely on the combined effect of sustainable board attributes and its impact of environmental performance and its major sub-pillars. Thus, this study provides new insight into the relationship between corporate governance and environmental performance in the EU capital market to guide researchers, business practice, and regulatory bodies.

KW - board gender diversity

KW - critical mass theory

KW - CSR committees

KW - CSR-related compensation

KW - environmental performance

KW - sustainable corporate governance

KW - Management studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85180868929&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/6f5fea88-4a94-323f-9aa7-8141039bf8ef/

U2 - 10.1002/bse.3654

DO - 10.1002/bse.3654

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85180868929

VL - 33

SP - 3397

EP - 3421

JO - Business Strategy and the Environment

JF - Business Strategy and the Environment

SN - 0964-4733

IS - 4

ER -

DOI