Scientific and local ecological knowledge, shaping perceptions towards protected areas and related ecosystem services
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet
Standard
in: Landscape Ecology, Jahrgang 35, Nr. 11, 01.11.2020, S. 2549-2567.
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Scientific and local ecological knowledge, shaping perceptions towards protected areas and related ecosystem services
AU - Cebrián-Piqueras, Miguel A.
AU - Filyushkina, Anna
AU - Johnson, Dana N.
AU - Lo, Veronica
AU - López-Rodríguez, María D.
AU - March, Hug
AU - Oteros-Rozas, E.
AU - Peppler-Lisbach, Cord
AU - Quintas-Soriano, Cristina
AU - Raymond, Cchristopher M.
AU - Ruiz-Mallén, Isabel
AU - van Riper, Carena J.
AU - Zinngrebe, Yves
AU - Plieninger, Tobias
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2020, The Author(s).
PY - 2020/11/1
Y1 - 2020/11/1
N2 - Context: Most protected areas are managed based on objectives related to scientific ecological knowledge of species and ecosystems. However, a core principle of sustainability science is that understanding and including local ecological knowledge, perceptions of ecosystem service provision and landscape vulnerability will improve sustainability and resilience of social-ecological systems. Here, we take up these assumptions in the context of protected areas to provide insight on the effectiveness of nature protection goals, particularly in highly human-influenced landscapes. Objectives: We examined how residents’ ecological knowledge systems, comprised of both local and scientific, mediated the relationship between their characteristics and a set of variables that represented perceptions of ecosystem services, landscape change, human-nature relationships, and impacts. Methods: We administered a face-to-face survey to local residents in the Sierra de Guadarrama protected areas, Spain. We used bi- and multi-variate analysis, including partial least squares path modeling to test our hypotheses. Results: Ecological knowledge systems were highly correlated and were instrumental in predicting perceptions of water-related ecosystem services, landscape change, increasing outdoors activities, and human-nature relationships. Engagement with nature, socio-demographics, trip characteristics, and a rural–urban gradient explained a high degree of variation in ecological knowledge. Bundles of perceived ecosystem services and impacts, in relation to ecological knowledge, emerged as social representation on how residents relate to, understand, and perceive landscapes. Conclusions: Our findings provide insight into the interactions between ecological knowledge systems and their role in shaping perceptions of local communities about protected areas. These results are expected to inform protected area management and landscape sustainability.
AB - Context: Most protected areas are managed based on objectives related to scientific ecological knowledge of species and ecosystems. However, a core principle of sustainability science is that understanding and including local ecological knowledge, perceptions of ecosystem service provision and landscape vulnerability will improve sustainability and resilience of social-ecological systems. Here, we take up these assumptions in the context of protected areas to provide insight on the effectiveness of nature protection goals, particularly in highly human-influenced landscapes. Objectives: We examined how residents’ ecological knowledge systems, comprised of both local and scientific, mediated the relationship between their characteristics and a set of variables that represented perceptions of ecosystem services, landscape change, human-nature relationships, and impacts. Methods: We administered a face-to-face survey to local residents in the Sierra de Guadarrama protected areas, Spain. We used bi- and multi-variate analysis, including partial least squares path modeling to test our hypotheses. Results: Ecological knowledge systems were highly correlated and were instrumental in predicting perceptions of water-related ecosystem services, landscape change, increasing outdoors activities, and human-nature relationships. Engagement with nature, socio-demographics, trip characteristics, and a rural–urban gradient explained a high degree of variation in ecological knowledge. Bundles of perceived ecosystem services and impacts, in relation to ecological knowledge, emerged as social representation on how residents relate to, understand, and perceive landscapes. Conclusions: Our findings provide insight into the interactions between ecological knowledge systems and their role in shaping perceptions of local communities about protected areas. These results are expected to inform protected area management and landscape sustainability.
KW - Biodiversity
KW - Ecosystem services
KW - Ecosystem vulnerability
KW - Human-nature relationships
KW - Inclusive conservation
KW - Landscape sustainability
KW - Local community
KW - Protected areas
KW - Traditional ecological knowledge
KW - Ecosystems Research
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85090799668&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/ee3700e9-8382-3878-af16-13b285ca0559/
U2 - 10.1007/s10980-020-01107-4
DO - 10.1007/s10980-020-01107-4
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:85090799668
VL - 35
SP - 2549
EP - 2567
JO - Landscape Ecology
JF - Landscape Ecology
SN - 0921-2973
IS - 11
ER -