Safe and Sustainable-by-Design under The European Green Deal - Regulatory Readiness or Pressure for Companies?

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Safe and Sustainable-by-Design under The European Green Deal - Regulatory Readiness or Pressure for Companies? / Sudheshwar, Akshat; Apel, Christina; Kümmerer, Klaus et al.
in: Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 13.12.2025.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Sudheshwar, A., Apel, C., Kümmerer, K., Soeteman-Hernández, L. G., Scheper, J. K., Falk, A., Batel, A., Markard, J., Som, C., Wang, Z., & Nowack, B. (2025). Safe and Sustainable-by-Design under The European Green Deal - Regulatory Readiness or Pressure for Companies? Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management. Vorzeitige Online-Publikation. https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjaf188

Vancouver

Sudheshwar A, Apel C, Kümmerer K, Soeteman-Hernández LG, Scheper JK, Falk A et al. Safe and Sustainable-by-Design under The European Green Deal - Regulatory Readiness or Pressure for Companies? Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management. 2025 Dez 13. Epub 2025 Dez 13. doi: 10.1093/inteam/vjaf188

Bibtex

@article{2758bc84330f4642a7cc7521ab233d6d,
title = "Safe and Sustainable-by-Design under The European Green Deal - Regulatory Readiness or Pressure for Companies?",
abstract = "The European Green Deal, popular for its {"}2050 climate neutrality{"} target, also postulates the {"}zero pollution ambition for a toxic-free environment{"}, supported through the Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability (CSS). The CSS mentions Safe and Sustainable-by-Design (SSbD), calling for the integration of safety and sustainability into innovation. Developing the SSbD framework further is a key action enabling both CSS objectives and the broader Green Deal ambitions. Yet, SSbD's complexity and data demands are seen by many companies as burdensome, while the benefits of SSbD adoption remain unclear. Therefore, this study examines SSbD's role in {"}regulatory readiness{"}, ie, proactive development of novel chemicals, materials, and products for compliance before market entry and for adaptability to future regulations. By analyzing 15 EU policies (prioritized through industry feedback) against 15 SSbD components, this study finds a 64% overlap, ie, many mandates for SSbD components are observed within the analyzed legislation. The findings of this study inform recommendations for industry and policymakers to foster industrial competitiveness in the EU. Companies are recommended to leverage SSbD for early regulatory readiness, internalize SSbD's {"}fail early and fail cheap{"} philosophy, and invest in SSbD capacity building. Policymakers are recommended to incentivize corporate SSbD adoption, explicitly integrate SSbD into future legislation, and invest in research to address critical gaps in safety and sustainability sciences to strengthen SSbD further.",
author = "Akshat Sudheshwar and Christina Apel and Klaus K{\"u}mmerer and Soeteman-Hern{\'a}ndez, {Lya G} and Scheper, {Johanna K} and Andreas Falk and Annika Batel and Jochen Markard and Claudia Som and Zhanyun Wang and Bernd Nowack",
note = "{\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry.",
year = "2025",
month = dec,
day = "13",
doi = "10.1093/inteam/vjaf188",
language = "English",
journal = "Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management",
issn = "1551-3777",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Safe and Sustainable-by-Design under The European Green Deal - Regulatory Readiness or Pressure for Companies?

AU - Sudheshwar, Akshat

AU - Apel, Christina

AU - Kümmerer, Klaus

AU - Soeteman-Hernández, Lya G

AU - Scheper, Johanna K

AU - Falk, Andreas

AU - Batel, Annika

AU - Markard, Jochen

AU - Som, Claudia

AU - Wang, Zhanyun

AU - Nowack, Bernd

N1 - © The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry.

PY - 2025/12/13

Y1 - 2025/12/13

N2 - The European Green Deal, popular for its "2050 climate neutrality" target, also postulates the "zero pollution ambition for a toxic-free environment", supported through the Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability (CSS). The CSS mentions Safe and Sustainable-by-Design (SSbD), calling for the integration of safety and sustainability into innovation. Developing the SSbD framework further is a key action enabling both CSS objectives and the broader Green Deal ambitions. Yet, SSbD's complexity and data demands are seen by many companies as burdensome, while the benefits of SSbD adoption remain unclear. Therefore, this study examines SSbD's role in "regulatory readiness", ie, proactive development of novel chemicals, materials, and products for compliance before market entry and for adaptability to future regulations. By analyzing 15 EU policies (prioritized through industry feedback) against 15 SSbD components, this study finds a 64% overlap, ie, many mandates for SSbD components are observed within the analyzed legislation. The findings of this study inform recommendations for industry and policymakers to foster industrial competitiveness in the EU. Companies are recommended to leverage SSbD for early regulatory readiness, internalize SSbD's "fail early and fail cheap" philosophy, and invest in SSbD capacity building. Policymakers are recommended to incentivize corporate SSbD adoption, explicitly integrate SSbD into future legislation, and invest in research to address critical gaps in safety and sustainability sciences to strengthen SSbD further.

AB - The European Green Deal, popular for its "2050 climate neutrality" target, also postulates the "zero pollution ambition for a toxic-free environment", supported through the Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability (CSS). The CSS mentions Safe and Sustainable-by-Design (SSbD), calling for the integration of safety and sustainability into innovation. Developing the SSbD framework further is a key action enabling both CSS objectives and the broader Green Deal ambitions. Yet, SSbD's complexity and data demands are seen by many companies as burdensome, while the benefits of SSbD adoption remain unclear. Therefore, this study examines SSbD's role in "regulatory readiness", ie, proactive development of novel chemicals, materials, and products for compliance before market entry and for adaptability to future regulations. By analyzing 15 EU policies (prioritized through industry feedback) against 15 SSbD components, this study finds a 64% overlap, ie, many mandates for SSbD components are observed within the analyzed legislation. The findings of this study inform recommendations for industry and policymakers to foster industrial competitiveness in the EU. Companies are recommended to leverage SSbD for early regulatory readiness, internalize SSbD's "fail early and fail cheap" philosophy, and invest in SSbD capacity building. Policymakers are recommended to incentivize corporate SSbD adoption, explicitly integrate SSbD into future legislation, and invest in research to address critical gaps in safety and sustainability sciences to strengthen SSbD further.

U2 - 10.1093/inteam/vjaf188

DO - 10.1093/inteam/vjaf188

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 41390921

JO - Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management

JF - Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management

SN - 1551-3777

ER -

DOI