1. //
  2. Start
  3. //
  4. Publikationen
  5. Repatriation, Public Programming, and th...
  6. Formate
  7. //

Repatriation, Public Programming, and the DEAI Toolkit

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Standard

Repatriation, Public Programming, and the DEAI Toolkit. / Bazan, Elizabeth; Black, Samuel W.; Thurn, Nike et al.
in: Journal of Museum Education, Jahrgang 46, Nr. 1, 04.2021, S. 27-37.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Harvard

Bazan, E, Black, SW, Thurn, N & Usbeck, F 2021, 'Repatriation, Public Programming, and the DEAI Toolkit', Journal of Museum Education, Jg. 46, Nr. 1, S. 27-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10598650.2020.1847501

APA

Bazan, E., Black, S. W., Thurn, N., & Usbeck, F. (2021). Repatriation, Public Programming, and the DEAI Toolkit. Journal of Museum Education, 46(1), 27-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10598650.2020.1847501

Vancouver

Bazan E, Black SW, Thurn N, Usbeck F. Repatriation, Public Programming, and the DEAI Toolkit. Journal of Museum Education. 2021 Apr;46(1):27-37. doi: 10.1080/10598650.2020.1847501

Bibtex

@article{d3577de08c974fdcac2236c5b11fd7ce,
title = "Repatriation, Public Programming, and the DEAI Toolkit",
abstract = "This article, prepared in the form of a conversation among the authors, discusses the role of a museum{\textquoteright}s repatriation of human remains or sacred objects to Indigenous communities in their efforts around Diversity, Equity, Access ibility, and Inclusion (DEAI). Presenting case studies from their museums or from their own research in Germany and the US, the authors observe that public programming, working in concert with repatriation, can become a tool for increasing DEAI in museums with benefits for source communities, as well as for museum visitors and staff. Given the scarcity of research literature on repatriation-centered programming and the fact that their case studies often comprised first steps in their institutions{\textquoteright} repatriation efforts, the contributors call for further study of public programming and its potential to facilitate the repatriation process.",
keywords = "cultural patrimony, Diversity, Equity, Accessibility, and Inclusion (DEAI), education, human remains, Indigenous peoples, public programming, repatriation, transatlantic comparison, Cultural studies",
author = "Elizabeth Bazan and Black, {Samuel W.} and Nike Thurn and Frank Usbeck",
year = "2021",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1080/10598650.2020.1847501",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "27--37",
journal = "Journal of Museum Education",
issn = "1059-8650",
publisher = "Routledge Taylor & Francis Group",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Repatriation, Public Programming, and the DEAI Toolkit

AU - Bazan, Elizabeth

AU - Black, Samuel W.

AU - Thurn, Nike

AU - Usbeck, Frank

PY - 2021/4

Y1 - 2021/4

N2 - This article, prepared in the form of a conversation among the authors, discusses the role of a museum’s repatriation of human remains or sacred objects to Indigenous communities in their efforts around Diversity, Equity, Access ibility, and Inclusion (DEAI). Presenting case studies from their museums or from their own research in Germany and the US, the authors observe that public programming, working in concert with repatriation, can become a tool for increasing DEAI in museums with benefits for source communities, as well as for museum visitors and staff. Given the scarcity of research literature on repatriation-centered programming and the fact that their case studies often comprised first steps in their institutions’ repatriation efforts, the contributors call for further study of public programming and its potential to facilitate the repatriation process.

AB - This article, prepared in the form of a conversation among the authors, discusses the role of a museum’s repatriation of human remains or sacred objects to Indigenous communities in their efforts around Diversity, Equity, Access ibility, and Inclusion (DEAI). Presenting case studies from their museums or from their own research in Germany and the US, the authors observe that public programming, working in concert with repatriation, can become a tool for increasing DEAI in museums with benefits for source communities, as well as for museum visitors and staff. Given the scarcity of research literature on repatriation-centered programming and the fact that their case studies often comprised first steps in their institutions’ repatriation efforts, the contributors call for further study of public programming and its potential to facilitate the repatriation process.

KW - cultural patrimony

KW - Diversity, Equity, Accessibility, and Inclusion (DEAI)

KW - education

KW - human remains

KW - Indigenous peoples

KW - public programming

KW - repatriation

KW - transatlantic comparison

KW - Cultural studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85102172340&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10598650.2020.1847501

DO - 10.1080/10598650.2020.1847501

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85102172340

VL - 46

SP - 27

EP - 37

JO - Journal of Museum Education

JF - Journal of Museum Education

SN - 1059-8650

IS - 1

ER -

DOI