Regulatory Expropriation Claims in International Investment Arbitration: A Bridge Too Far?

Alessandra Asteriti

Regulatory Expropriation Claims in International Investment Arbitration: A Bridge Too Far?

Publikation: Beiträge in Sammelwerken › Aufsätze in Sammelwerken › Forschung › begutachtet

Standard

Regulatory Expropriation Claims in International Investment Arbitration : A Bridge Too Far? / Asteriti, Alessandra.

Yearbook on International Investment Law and Policy 2012-2013. Hrsg. / Andrea Bjorklund. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2014. S. 451-472.

Publikation: Beiträge in Sammelwerken › Aufsätze in Sammelwerken › Forschung › begutachtet

Harvard

Asteriti, A 2014, Regulatory Expropriation Claims in International Investment Arbitration: A Bridge Too Far? in A Bjorklund (Hrsg.), Yearbook on International Investment Law and Policy 2012-2013. Oxford University Press, Oxford, S. 451-472.

APA

Asteriti, A. (2014). Regulatory Expropriation Claims in International Investment Arbitration: A Bridge Too Far? in A. Bjorklund (Hrsg.), Yearbook on International Investment Law and Policy 2012-2013 (S. 451-472). Oxford University Press.

Vancouver

Asteriti A. Regulatory Expropriation Claims in International Investment Arbitration: A Bridge Too Far? in Bjorklund A, Hrsg., Yearbook on International Investment Law and Policy 2012-2013. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2014. S. 451-472

Bibtex

@inbook{67d830e3b4dd46c29a7e66a5b7761e37,

title = "Regulatory Expropriation Claims in International Investment Arbitration: A Bridge Too Far?",

abstract = "The article analyses how the investment legal regime accommodates exogenous environmental and sustainable development demands through the legal tools at its disposal, examining how tribunals respond to claims of regulatory expropriation. The article shows that some investment tribunals have either adopted the ad hoc balancing characteristic of the United States Supreme Court{\textquoteright}s approach to regulatory takings claims, while others have attempted the proportionality analysis derived from European constitutional traditions. The article aims to assess if either of these approaches is more conducive than the other to due consideration being given to sustainable development{\textquoteright}s objectives, offering the new practice of clarification and expansion of indirect expropriation clauses as the best guarantees for {\textquoteleft}sustainable investment protection.{\textquoteright}",

keywords = "Law, Investment , environment",

author = "Alessandra Asteriti",

year = "2014",

language = "English",

isbn = "9780199386321",

pages = "451--472",

editor = "Andrea Bjorklund",

booktitle = "Yearbook on International Investment Law and Policy 2012-2013",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

address = "United Kingdom",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Regulatory Expropriation Claims in International Investment Arbitration

T2 - A Bridge Too Far?

AU - Asteriti, Alessandra

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The article analyses how the investment legal regime accommodates exogenous environmental and sustainable development demands through the legal tools at its disposal, examining how tribunals respond to claims of regulatory expropriation. The article shows that some investment tribunals have either adopted the ad hoc balancing characteristic of the United States Supreme Court’s approach to regulatory takings claims, while others have attempted the proportionality analysis derived from European constitutional traditions. The article aims to assess if either of these approaches is more conducive than the other to due consideration being given to sustainable development’s objectives, offering the new practice of clarification and expansion of indirect expropriation clauses as the best guarantees for ‘sustainable investment protection.’

AB - The article analyses how the investment legal regime accommodates exogenous environmental and sustainable development demands through the legal tools at its disposal, examining how tribunals respond to claims of regulatory expropriation. The article shows that some investment tribunals have either adopted the ad hoc balancing characteristic of the United States Supreme Court’s approach to regulatory takings claims, while others have attempted the proportionality analysis derived from European constitutional traditions. The article aims to assess if either of these approaches is more conducive than the other to due consideration being given to sustainable development’s objectives, offering the new practice of clarification and expansion of indirect expropriation clauses as the best guarantees for ‘sustainable investment protection.’

KW - Law

KW - Investment

KW - environment

UR - https://global.oup.com/academic/product/yearbook-on-international-investment-law-and-policy-2012-2013-9780199386321?cc=de&lang=en&

UR - https://ssrn.com/abstract=2445050

M3 - Contributions to collected editions/anthologies

SN - 9780199386321

SP - 451

EP - 472

BT - Yearbook on International Investment Law and Policy 2012-2013

A2 - Bjorklund, Andrea

PB - Oxford University Press

CY - Oxford

ER -

Weitere Publikationen dieser Person(en)

Cultural Heritage

Asteriti, A., 15.01.2021, Encyclopedia of law and development. De Feyter, K., Erdem Türkelli, G., Moerloose, S., Dann, P., Tan, C., Pirjatanniemi, E. & Govindjee, A. (Hrsg.). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, S. 55-58 4 S.

Publikation: Beiträge in Sammelwerken › Lexikonbeiträge › Forschung

Article 21 and the EU’s Common Commercial Policy: A Test of Coherence

Asteriti, A., 2017, European Yearbook of International Economic Law 2017. Bungenberg, M., Terhechte, J. P. & Ziegler, A. R. (Hrsg.). Cham: Springer International Publishing AG, S. 111-137 27 S. (European Yearbook of International Economic Law ; Nr. 8).

Publikation: Beiträge in Sammelwerken › Aufsätze in Sammelwerken › Forschung › begutachtet