Reframing the possible: Rancièrian aesthetics and the study of organization
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet
Standard
in: Aesthesis, Jahrgang 2, Nr. 1, 2008, S. 32-42.
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Reframing the possible
T2 - Rancièrian aesthetics and the study of organization
AU - Beyes, Timon
PY - 2008
Y1 - 2008
N2 - This paper draws upon the work of the philosopher Jacques Rancière in order to outline a reconfigura-tion of the relations between aesthetics, art and organization (theory). For this, I will consider a specific notion of aesthetics as the distribution of the sensible that enables modes of articulation, i.e. ways of perceiving, thinking and saying (Rancière, 2004a). Hence, aesthetics here does neither refer to a theory of taste and sensual pleasure, nor solely to art theory or the study of specific forms of art. For reasons that will be discussed in this paper, Rancière nevertheless attributes to art a significant power of rearranging and expanding what can be perceived and what is thinkable (Rancière, 2007b). I will suggest that a Rancièrian thinking of aesthetics in general as well as its implications for exploring artistic endeavours in particular are interesting terrain for the study of organization and the field of organizational aesthetics, most notably by provoking the organizational scholar to think rupture and dissent, hence emergence and newness from an aesthetico-political perspective.
AB - This paper draws upon the work of the philosopher Jacques Rancière in order to outline a reconfigura-tion of the relations between aesthetics, art and organization (theory). For this, I will consider a specific notion of aesthetics as the distribution of the sensible that enables modes of articulation, i.e. ways of perceiving, thinking and saying (Rancière, 2004a). Hence, aesthetics here does neither refer to a theory of taste and sensual pleasure, nor solely to art theory or the study of specific forms of art. For reasons that will be discussed in this paper, Rancière nevertheless attributes to art a significant power of rearranging and expanding what can be perceived and what is thinkable (Rancière, 2007b). I will suggest that a Rancièrian thinking of aesthetics in general as well as its implications for exploring artistic endeavours in particular are interesting terrain for the study of organization and the field of organizational aesthetics, most notably by provoking the organizational scholar to think rupture and dissent, hence emergence and newness from an aesthetico-political perspective.
KW - Cultural studies
KW - Media and communication studies
KW - Digital media
KW - Digitale Kultur
KW - Digitale Kulturen
KW - Netzkultur
KW - Medienkultur
KW - Medienkulturen
KW - Medienwissenschaften
KW - Neue Medien
KW - Soziale Medien
KW - Medientheorie
KW - digital Culture
KW - digital Cultures
KW - net culture
KW - meida culture
KW - media cultures
KW - media studies
KW - new media
KW - social media
KW - media theory
KW - Transdisciplinary studies
UR - https://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/49829/
M3 - Journal articles
VL - 2
SP - 32
EP - 42
JO - Aesthesis
JF - Aesthesis
SN - 1751-9853
IS - 1
ER -