Quantifying simultaneous innovations in evolutionary medicine
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet
Standard
in: Theory in Biosciences, Jahrgang 139, Nr. 4, 12.2020, S. 319-335.
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Quantifying simultaneous innovations in evolutionary medicine
AU - Painter, Deryc T.
AU - van der Wouden, Frank
AU - Laubichler, Manfred D.
AU - Youn, Hyejin
PY - 2020/12
Y1 - 2020/12
N2 - To what extent do simultaneous innovations occur and are independently from each other? In this paper we use a novel persistent keyword framework to systematically identify innovations in a large corpus containing academic papers in evolutionary medicine between 2007 and 2011. We examine whether innovative papers occurring simultaneously are independent from each other by evaluating the citation and co-authorship information gathered from the corpus metadata. We find that 19 out of 22 simultaneous innovative papers do, in fact, occur independently from each other. In particular, co-authors of simultaneous innovative papers are no more geographically concentrated than the co-authors of similar non-innovative papers in the field. Our result suggests producing innovative work draws from a collective knowledge pool, rather than from knowledge circulating in distinct localized collaboration networks. Therefore, new ideas can appear at multiple locations and with geographically dispersed co-authorship networks. Our findings support the perspective that simultaneous innovations are the outcome of collective behavior.
AB - To what extent do simultaneous innovations occur and are independently from each other? In this paper we use a novel persistent keyword framework to systematically identify innovations in a large corpus containing academic papers in evolutionary medicine between 2007 and 2011. We examine whether innovative papers occurring simultaneously are independent from each other by evaluating the citation and co-authorship information gathered from the corpus metadata. We find that 19 out of 22 simultaneous innovative papers do, in fact, occur independently from each other. In particular, co-authors of simultaneous innovative papers are no more geographically concentrated than the co-authors of similar non-innovative papers in the field. Our result suggests producing innovative work draws from a collective knowledge pool, rather than from knowledge circulating in distinct localized collaboration networks. Therefore, new ideas can appear at multiple locations and with geographically dispersed co-authorship networks. Our findings support the perspective that simultaneous innovations are the outcome of collective behavior.
KW - Evolutionary medicine
KW - Independence
KW - Keyword extraction
KW - Novelty
KW - Simultaneous innovation
KW - Transdisciplinary studies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85096537045&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/2b490610-2a94-32df-9a8f-84042b3c318b/
U2 - 10.1007/s12064-020-00333-3
DO - 10.1007/s12064-020-00333-3
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 33241494
AN - SCOPUS:85096537045
VL - 139
SP - 319
EP - 335
JO - Theory in Biosciences
JF - Theory in Biosciences
SN - 1431-7613
IS - 4
ER -