Putting Architecture in its Social Space: the Fields and Skills of Planning Maastricht

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenKapitelbegutachtet

Standard

Putting Architecture in its Social Space: the Fields and Skills of Planning Maastricht. / Herberg, Jeremias .

Architecture, Materiality and Society: Connecting Sociology of Architecture with Science and Technology Studies. Hrsg. / Anna-Lisa Müller; Werner Reichmann. Hampshire : Palgrave Macmillan, 2015. S. 166-197.

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenKapitelbegutachtet

Harvard

Herberg, J 2015, Putting Architecture in its Social Space: the Fields and Skills of Planning Maastricht. in A-L Müller & W Reichmann (Hrsg.), Architecture, Materiality and Society: Connecting Sociology of Architecture with Science and Technology Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire, S. 166-197. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137461131_9

APA

Herberg, J. (2015). Putting Architecture in its Social Space: the Fields and Skills of Planning Maastricht. in A-L. Müller, & W. Reichmann (Hrsg.), Architecture, Materiality and Society: Connecting Sociology of Architecture with Science and Technology Studies (S. 166-197). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137461131_9

Vancouver

Herberg J. Putting Architecture in its Social Space: the Fields and Skills of Planning Maastricht. in Müller A-L, Reichmann W, Hrsg., Architecture, Materiality and Society: Connecting Sociology of Architecture with Science and Technology Studies. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. 2015. S. 166-197 doi: 10.1057/9781137461131_9

Bibtex

@inbook{a1aee2c70e664a73853ab6e2eafc7595,
title = "Putting Architecture in its Social Space: the Fields and Skills of Planning Maastricht",
abstract = "Architectural projects often attract diverging political expectations and evolve into relatively structured areas of dispute or political arenas. This chapter investigates the role of architecture within such arenas in the town of Maastricht, the Netherlands. I use theoretical frameworks from A Theory of Fields (Fligstein and McAdam 2012) and the Science and Technology Studies in order to gain a nuanced view on both the locality and materiality of architectural disputes.Based on two contrasting case studies, I claim a bidirectional influence of buildings and dispute because architecture, when being discussed, alters the pathways of interacting that are viable within a political arena. Architecture even shapes the skills that actors employ in order to gain political influence.",
keywords = "Transdisciplinary studies, Sociology",
author = "Jeremias Herberg",
year = "2015",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1057/9781137461131_9",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-1-349-69001-5",
pages = "166--197",
editor = "Anna-Lisa M{\"u}ller and Werner Reichmann",
booktitle = "Architecture, Materiality and Society",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan",
address = "Switzerland",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Putting Architecture in its Social Space: the Fields and Skills of Planning Maastricht

AU - Herberg, Jeremias

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Architectural projects often attract diverging political expectations and evolve into relatively structured areas of dispute or political arenas. This chapter investigates the role of architecture within such arenas in the town of Maastricht, the Netherlands. I use theoretical frameworks from A Theory of Fields (Fligstein and McAdam 2012) and the Science and Technology Studies in order to gain a nuanced view on both the locality and materiality of architectural disputes.Based on two contrasting case studies, I claim a bidirectional influence of buildings and dispute because architecture, when being discussed, alters the pathways of interacting that are viable within a political arena. Architecture even shapes the skills that actors employ in order to gain political influence.

AB - Architectural projects often attract diverging political expectations and evolve into relatively structured areas of dispute or political arenas. This chapter investigates the role of architecture within such arenas in the town of Maastricht, the Netherlands. I use theoretical frameworks from A Theory of Fields (Fligstein and McAdam 2012) and the Science and Technology Studies in order to gain a nuanced view on both the locality and materiality of architectural disputes.Based on two contrasting case studies, I claim a bidirectional influence of buildings and dispute because architecture, when being discussed, alters the pathways of interacting that are viable within a political arena. Architecture even shapes the skills that actors employ in order to gain political influence.

KW - Transdisciplinary studies

KW - Sociology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84960380506&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1057/9781137461131_9

DO - 10.1057/9781137461131_9

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-1-349-69001-5

SN - 978-113746112-4

SP - 166

EP - 197

BT - Architecture, Materiality and Society

A2 - Müller, Anna-Lisa

A2 - Reichmann, Werner

PB - Palgrave Macmillan

CY - Hampshire

ER -

DOI