Problems in Mathematizing Systems Biology

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenKapitelbegutachtet

Standard

Problems in Mathematizing Systems Biology. / Gramelsberger, Gabriele.
Philosophy of Systems Biology: Perspectives from Scientists and Philosophers. Hrsg. / Sara Green. Copenhagen: Springer International Publishing AG, 2017. S. 99 - 107 (History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences; Band 20).

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenKapitelbegutachtet

Harvard

Gramelsberger, G 2017, Problems in Mathematizing Systems Biology. in S Green (Hrsg.), Philosophy of Systems Biology: Perspectives from Scientists and Philosophers. History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences, Bd. 20, Springer International Publishing AG, Copenhagen, S. 99 - 107. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47000-9_9

APA

Gramelsberger, G. (2017). Problems in Mathematizing Systems Biology. In S. Green (Hrsg.), Philosophy of Systems Biology: Perspectives from Scientists and Philosophers (S. 99 - 107). (History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences; Band 20). Springer International Publishing AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47000-9_9

Vancouver

Gramelsberger G. Problems in Mathematizing Systems Biology. in Green S, Hrsg., Philosophy of Systems Biology: Perspectives from Scientists and Philosophers. Copenhagen: Springer International Publishing AG. 2017. S. 99 - 107. (History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-47000-9_9

Bibtex

@inbook{33d7eaa1710940d3a626fe5fc4318bba,
title = "Problems in Mathematizing Systems Biology",
abstract = "“I think biology stands out as a discipline in which there has been a wild flowering of interdisciplinary approaches – bioinformatics, for example, and applications of informational visualization. This flowering has not kept pace with our understanding. For example, there is a small industry devoted to creating visualization tools for biologists. One of the prominent standards for assessing whether these tools perform well is whether using the tools facilitates insight; but there remains conceptual confusion within the info-vis community about just what counts as an insight, about how to measure or even count insights, and about whether insight is the proper standard for success as opposed to, say, some speed-related standard. This is just the sort of issue for which philosophers of science, and maybe even some epistemologists, are especially well equipped to address.”",
keywords = "Digital media, Synthetic Biology, Flux Balance Analysis, System Biology Markup Language, Ozone Hole, Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project, Philosophy",
author = "Gabriele Gramelsberger",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-47000-9_9",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-3-319-46999-7",
series = "History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences",
publisher = "Springer International Publishing AG",
pages = "99 -- 107",
editor = "Sara Green",
booktitle = "Philosophy of Systems Biology",
address = "Switzerland",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Problems in Mathematizing Systems Biology

AU - Gramelsberger, Gabriele

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - “I think biology stands out as a discipline in which there has been a wild flowering of interdisciplinary approaches – bioinformatics, for example, and applications of informational visualization. This flowering has not kept pace with our understanding. For example, there is a small industry devoted to creating visualization tools for biologists. One of the prominent standards for assessing whether these tools perform well is whether using the tools facilitates insight; but there remains conceptual confusion within the info-vis community about just what counts as an insight, about how to measure or even count insights, and about whether insight is the proper standard for success as opposed to, say, some speed-related standard. This is just the sort of issue for which philosophers of science, and maybe even some epistemologists, are especially well equipped to address.”

AB - “I think biology stands out as a discipline in which there has been a wild flowering of interdisciplinary approaches – bioinformatics, for example, and applications of informational visualization. This flowering has not kept pace with our understanding. For example, there is a small industry devoted to creating visualization tools for biologists. One of the prominent standards for assessing whether these tools perform well is whether using the tools facilitates insight; but there remains conceptual confusion within the info-vis community about just what counts as an insight, about how to measure or even count insights, and about whether insight is the proper standard for success as opposed to, say, some speed-related standard. This is just the sort of issue for which philosophers of science, and maybe even some epistemologists, are especially well equipped to address.”

KW - Digital media

KW - Synthetic Biology

KW - Flux Balance Analysis

KW - System Biology Markup Language

KW - Ozone Hole

KW - Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project

KW - Philosophy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85098060615&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-47000-9_9

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-47000-9_9

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-3-319-46999-7

T3 - History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences

SP - 99

EP - 107

BT - Philosophy of Systems Biology

A2 - Green, Sara

PB - Springer International Publishing AG

CY - Copenhagen

ER -

DOI