Postmodern Epistemology in Organization Studies: A Critical Appraisal

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenKapitelbegutachtet

Standard

Postmodern Epistemology in Organization Studies: A Critical Appraisal. / McKinley, William.
Postmodernism and Management: Pros, Cons and the Alternative. Hrsg. / Edwin A. Locke. Amsterdam: Emerald Publishing Limited, 2003. S. 203-225 (Research in the Sociology of Organizations; Band 21).

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenKapitelbegutachtet

Harvard

McKinley, W 2003, Postmodern Epistemology in Organization Studies: A Critical Appraisal. in EA Locke (Hrsg.), Postmodernism and Management: Pros, Cons and the Alternative. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Bd. 21, Emerald Publishing Limited, Amsterdam, S. 203-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0733-558X(03)21007-7

APA

McKinley, W. (2003). Postmodern Epistemology in Organization Studies: A Critical Appraisal. In E. A. Locke (Hrsg.), Postmodernism and Management: Pros, Cons and the Alternative (S. 203-225). (Research in the Sociology of Organizations; Band 21). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0733-558X(03)21007-7

Vancouver

McKinley W. Postmodern Epistemology in Organization Studies: A Critical Appraisal. in Locke EA, Hrsg., Postmodernism and Management: Pros, Cons and the Alternative. Amsterdam: Emerald Publishing Limited. 2003. S. 203-225. (Research in the Sociology of Organizations). doi: 10.1016/S0733-558X(03)21007-7

Bibtex

@inbook{4a6d08a025084a209d9bf2a4d21590ff,
title = "Postmodern Epistemology in Organization Studies: A Critical Appraisal",
abstract = "During the last 10 years, there have been several calls for a postmodern epistemology in organization studies (e.g. Hassard, 1994; Kilduff & Mehra, 1997). While most organization studies researchers would probably not think of themselves as postmodernists, one response to these calls is that the callers are preaching to the already converted. That is, the implicit norms that govern what are considered desirable scholarly contributions in organization studies today already bear the stamp of a postmodern epistemology. It is an epistemology that has not been consciously adopted by most organization studies scholars, but nevertheless has left its imprint on their work. The purpose of this chapter is to develop that argument, focusing first on three scholarly norms that are prominent in contemporary organization studies. These three scholarly norms are: (1) the positive valuation of the attribute “insight”; (2) the use and positive valuation of broad-scope theoretical constructs; and (3) the positive valuation of multiple schools of thought. I will discuss each of these norms in turn and argue that each is consistent with, and supported by, underlying currents of thought in postmodernist epistemology. I will identify the elements of postmodernist epistemology that I believe support each norm and then critically appraise the norm in light of reservations I have about postmodernist thought. While the three norms identified above certainly do not cover the entire range of scholarly “best practices” in organization studies today, I believe they are sufficient to illustrate the link between everyday scholarly practice in the discipline and postmodernist views of knowledge.",
keywords = "Management studies",
author = "William McKinley",
year = "2003",
month = mar,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1016/S0733-558X(03)21007-7",
language = "English",
isbn = "0762310049",
series = "Research in the Sociology of Organizations",
publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",
pages = "203--225",
editor = "Locke, {Edwin A.}",
booktitle = "Postmodernism and Management",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Postmodern Epistemology in Organization Studies

T2 - A Critical Appraisal

AU - McKinley, William

PY - 2003/3/31

Y1 - 2003/3/31

N2 - During the last 10 years, there have been several calls for a postmodern epistemology in organization studies (e.g. Hassard, 1994; Kilduff & Mehra, 1997). While most organization studies researchers would probably not think of themselves as postmodernists, one response to these calls is that the callers are preaching to the already converted. That is, the implicit norms that govern what are considered desirable scholarly contributions in organization studies today already bear the stamp of a postmodern epistemology. It is an epistemology that has not been consciously adopted by most organization studies scholars, but nevertheless has left its imprint on their work. The purpose of this chapter is to develop that argument, focusing first on three scholarly norms that are prominent in contemporary organization studies. These three scholarly norms are: (1) the positive valuation of the attribute “insight”; (2) the use and positive valuation of broad-scope theoretical constructs; and (3) the positive valuation of multiple schools of thought. I will discuss each of these norms in turn and argue that each is consistent with, and supported by, underlying currents of thought in postmodernist epistemology. I will identify the elements of postmodernist epistemology that I believe support each norm and then critically appraise the norm in light of reservations I have about postmodernist thought. While the three norms identified above certainly do not cover the entire range of scholarly “best practices” in organization studies today, I believe they are sufficient to illustrate the link between everyday scholarly practice in the discipline and postmodernist views of knowledge.

AB - During the last 10 years, there have been several calls for a postmodern epistemology in organization studies (e.g. Hassard, 1994; Kilduff & Mehra, 1997). While most organization studies researchers would probably not think of themselves as postmodernists, one response to these calls is that the callers are preaching to the already converted. That is, the implicit norms that govern what are considered desirable scholarly contributions in organization studies today already bear the stamp of a postmodern epistemology. It is an epistemology that has not been consciously adopted by most organization studies scholars, but nevertheless has left its imprint on their work. The purpose of this chapter is to develop that argument, focusing first on three scholarly norms that are prominent in contemporary organization studies. These three scholarly norms are: (1) the positive valuation of the attribute “insight”; (2) the use and positive valuation of broad-scope theoretical constructs; and (3) the positive valuation of multiple schools of thought. I will discuss each of these norms in turn and argue that each is consistent with, and supported by, underlying currents of thought in postmodernist epistemology. I will identify the elements of postmodernist epistemology that I believe support each norm and then critically appraise the norm in light of reservations I have about postmodernist thought. While the three norms identified above certainly do not cover the entire range of scholarly “best practices” in organization studies today, I believe they are sufficient to illustrate the link between everyday scholarly practice in the discipline and postmodernist views of knowledge.

KW - Management studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34247439004&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0733-558X(03)21007-7

DO - 10.1016/S0733-558X(03)21007-7

M3 - Chapter

SN - 0762310049

SN - 9780762310043

T3 - Research in the Sociology of Organizations

SP - 203

EP - 225

BT - Postmodernism and Management

A2 - Locke, Edwin A.

PB - Emerald Publishing Limited

CY - Amsterdam

ER -

DOI