Perceptions of cultural ecosystem services from urban green

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Perceptions of cultural ecosystem services from urban green. / Riechers, Maraja; Barkmann, Jan; Tscharntke, Teja.
in: Ecosystem Services, Jahrgang 17, 01.02.2016, S. 33-39.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Riechers M, Barkmann J, Tscharntke T. Perceptions of cultural ecosystem services from urban green. Ecosystem Services. 2016 Feb 1;17:33-39. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.11.007

Bibtex

@article{84acd1a4173d42f5b1f73ce52e476479,
title = "Perceptions of cultural ecosystem services from urban green",
abstract = "Cultural ecosystem services are growing in importance and their substantial contribution to well-being is well recognized. Yet, significant conceptual and methodological gaps exist, especially for urban ecosystems. We analyzed perceptions of cultural ecosystem services in the urban context of Berlin, based on qualitative research methods. Using expert and problem-centered interviews, we show how cultural ecosystem services are understood and which focus areas were emphasized. We compared our inductive codes with the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. While our findings show supporting evidence for the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment classification, some categories had to be substituted and others adjusted to local citizen understandings. The results reveal a variety of intricate cultural ecosystem service perceptions. Hence, selecting and emphasizing only a few services without prior studies could misinform decision-makers and lead to biased policy outcome. Regionally specific perceptions of cultural benefits from urban green are important information for planning processes. Cultural ecosystem services could be one way to achieve awareness of socio-ecological aspects, as our results show linkages between cultural ecosystem services and urban social sustainability. Using qualitative cultural ecosystem service research could foster public participation and increase the input of regionally specific perceptions.",
keywords = "Cultural values, Qualitative research, Sustainable development, Urban social sustainability, Valuation, Ecosystems Research, Environmental planning",
author = "Maraja Riechers and Jan Barkmann and Teja Tscharntke",
year = "2016",
month = feb,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.11.007",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "33--39",
journal = "Ecosystem Services",
issn = "2212-0416",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perceptions of cultural ecosystem services from urban green

AU - Riechers, Maraja

AU - Barkmann, Jan

AU - Tscharntke, Teja

PY - 2016/2/1

Y1 - 2016/2/1

N2 - Cultural ecosystem services are growing in importance and their substantial contribution to well-being is well recognized. Yet, significant conceptual and methodological gaps exist, especially for urban ecosystems. We analyzed perceptions of cultural ecosystem services in the urban context of Berlin, based on qualitative research methods. Using expert and problem-centered interviews, we show how cultural ecosystem services are understood and which focus areas were emphasized. We compared our inductive codes with the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. While our findings show supporting evidence for the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment classification, some categories had to be substituted and others adjusted to local citizen understandings. The results reveal a variety of intricate cultural ecosystem service perceptions. Hence, selecting and emphasizing only a few services without prior studies could misinform decision-makers and lead to biased policy outcome. Regionally specific perceptions of cultural benefits from urban green are important information for planning processes. Cultural ecosystem services could be one way to achieve awareness of socio-ecological aspects, as our results show linkages between cultural ecosystem services and urban social sustainability. Using qualitative cultural ecosystem service research could foster public participation and increase the input of regionally specific perceptions.

AB - Cultural ecosystem services are growing in importance and their substantial contribution to well-being is well recognized. Yet, significant conceptual and methodological gaps exist, especially for urban ecosystems. We analyzed perceptions of cultural ecosystem services in the urban context of Berlin, based on qualitative research methods. Using expert and problem-centered interviews, we show how cultural ecosystem services are understood and which focus areas were emphasized. We compared our inductive codes with the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. While our findings show supporting evidence for the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment classification, some categories had to be substituted and others adjusted to local citizen understandings. The results reveal a variety of intricate cultural ecosystem service perceptions. Hence, selecting and emphasizing only a few services without prior studies could misinform decision-makers and lead to biased policy outcome. Regionally specific perceptions of cultural benefits from urban green are important information for planning processes. Cultural ecosystem services could be one way to achieve awareness of socio-ecological aspects, as our results show linkages between cultural ecosystem services and urban social sustainability. Using qualitative cultural ecosystem service research could foster public participation and increase the input of regionally specific perceptions.

KW - Cultural values

KW - Qualitative research

KW - Sustainable development

KW - Urban social sustainability

KW - Valuation

KW - Ecosystems Research

KW - Environmental planning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84948136573&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.11.007

DO - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.11.007

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:84948136573

VL - 17

SP - 33

EP - 39

JO - Ecosystem Services

JF - Ecosystem Services

SN - 2212-0416

ER -

DOI