One voice, one message, but conflicting goals: Cohesiveness and consistency in the European Neighbourhood Policy
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet
Standard
One voice, one message, but conflicting goals : Cohesiveness and consistency in the European Neighbourhood Policy. / Börzel, Tanja A.; van Hüllen, Vera.
in: Journal of European Public Policy, Jahrgang 21, Nr. 7, 08.2014, S. 1033–1049.Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - One voice, one message, but conflicting goals
T2 - Cohesiveness and consistency in the European Neighbourhood Policy
AU - Börzel, Tanja A.
AU - van Hüllen, Vera
N1 - Special Issue: Speaking with a single voice: the EU as an effective actor in global governance?
PY - 2014/8
Y1 - 2014/8
N2 - The failure of the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) in bringing about democratic change in the European Union (EU)’s neighbourhood starts with the EU’s limited effectiveness in shaping outcomes of international negotiations according to the ambitious objectives it pursues. This paper argues that this is not primarily a problem of a lack of actorness, however. The EU does have one message and speaks with a single voice but pursues conflicting goals. Rather than the lack of internal cohesiveness, it is the ENP’s substantive inconsistency in seeking to promote effective and democratic governance that undermines the EU’s external effectiveness. While the ENP conceives of the two objectives as complemen- tary, the democratization of (semi-)authoritarian countries entails the risk of their destabilization at least in the short run. As a result, promoting effective and democratic governance become conflicting objectives. The lower the level of political liberalization and the higher the instability of a country, the more ineffective the EU is in asserting a democratic reform agenda in the ENP Action Plans, clearly favouring stability over change.
AB - The failure of the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) in bringing about democratic change in the European Union (EU)’s neighbourhood starts with the EU’s limited effectiveness in shaping outcomes of international negotiations according to the ambitious objectives it pursues. This paper argues that this is not primarily a problem of a lack of actorness, however. The EU does have one message and speaks with a single voice but pursues conflicting goals. Rather than the lack of internal cohesiveness, it is the ENP’s substantive inconsistency in seeking to promote effective and democratic governance that undermines the EU’s external effectiveness. While the ENP conceives of the two objectives as complemen- tary, the democratization of (semi-)authoritarian countries entails the risk of their destabilization at least in the short run. As a result, promoting effective and democratic governance become conflicting objectives. The lower the level of political liberalization and the higher the instability of a country, the more ineffective the EU is in asserting a democratic reform agenda in the ENP Action Plans, clearly favouring stability over change.
KW - Politics
KW - Actorness
KW - cohesiveness
KW - European Neighbourhood Policy
KW - European Union
KW - single voice
U2 - 10.1080/13501763.2014.912147
DO - 10.1080/13501763.2014.912147
M3 - Journal articles
VL - 21
SP - 1033
EP - 1049
JO - Journal of European Public Policy
JF - Journal of European Public Policy
SN - 1350-1763
IS - 7
ER -