Methane mitigation
Publikation: Beiträge in Sammelwerken › Kapitel › begutachtet
Standard
Smart Solutions to Climate Change: Comparing Costs and Benefits. Hrsg. / Bjørn Lomborg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. S. 172-221.
Publikation: Beiträge in Sammelwerken › Kapitel › begutachtet
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - CHAP
T1 - Methane mitigation
AU - Kemfert, Claudia
AU - Schill, Wolf Peter
AU - Anthoff, David
AU - Johansson, Daniel J. A.
AU - Hedenus, Fredrik
PY - 2010/9/9
Y1 - 2010/9/9
N2 - I.troduction. Methane (CH4) is a major anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG), second only to carbon dioxide (CO2) in its impact on climate change. CH4 has a high global warming potential that is twenty-five times as large as that of CO2 on a 100-year time horizon according to the 2007 I.CC report (I.CC 2007a). T.us, CH4 contributes significantly to anthropogenic radiative forcing, although it has a relatively short atmospheric perturbation lifetime of twelve years. CH4 has a variety of sources that can be small, geographically dispersed, and not related to energy sectors. I. this chapter, we analyze CH4 emission abatement options in five different sectors and identify economic mitigation potentials for different CO2 prices. While mitigation potentials are generally large, there are substantial potentials at low marginal abatement costs (MA.s). Drawing on different assumptions on the social costs of carbon (S.C), we calculate benefit-cost ratios (BCRs) for different sectors and mitigation levels. We recommend an economically efficient global CH4 mitigation portfolio for 2020 that includes the sectors of livestock and manure, rice management, solid waste, coal mine methane, and natural gas. Depending on S.C assumptions, this portfolio leads to global CH4 mitigation levels of 1.5 or 1.9 GtCO2-eq at overall costs of around $14 billion or $30 billion and BCRs of 1.4 and 3.0, respectively. We also develop an economically less efficient alternative portfolio that excludes cost-effective agricultural mitigation options. I. leads to comparable abatement levels, but has higher costs and lower BCRs.
AB - I.troduction. Methane (CH4) is a major anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG), second only to carbon dioxide (CO2) in its impact on climate change. CH4 has a high global warming potential that is twenty-five times as large as that of CO2 on a 100-year time horizon according to the 2007 I.CC report (I.CC 2007a). T.us, CH4 contributes significantly to anthropogenic radiative forcing, although it has a relatively short atmospheric perturbation lifetime of twelve years. CH4 has a variety of sources that can be small, geographically dispersed, and not related to energy sectors. I. this chapter, we analyze CH4 emission abatement options in five different sectors and identify economic mitigation potentials for different CO2 prices. While mitigation potentials are generally large, there are substantial potentials at low marginal abatement costs (MA.s). Drawing on different assumptions on the social costs of carbon (S.C), we calculate benefit-cost ratios (BCRs) for different sectors and mitigation levels. We recommend an economically efficient global CH4 mitigation portfolio for 2020 that includes the sectors of livestock and manure, rice management, solid waste, coal mine methane, and natural gas. Depending on S.C assumptions, this portfolio leads to global CH4 mitigation levels of 1.5 or 1.9 GtCO2-eq at overall costs of around $14 billion or $30 billion and BCRs of 1.4 and 3.0, respectively. We also develop an economically less efficient alternative portfolio that excludes cost-effective agricultural mitigation options. I. leads to comparable abatement levels, but has higher costs and lower BCRs.
KW - Economics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924110221&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511779015.006
DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511779015.006
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:84924110221
SN - 9780521763424
SP - 172
EP - 221
BT - Smart Solutions to Climate Change
A2 - Lomborg, Bjørn
PB - Cambridge University Press
CY - Cambridge
ER -