Knowledge Decolonization à la Grounded Theory: Control Juggling in Research Situations

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Knowledge Decolonization à la Grounded Theory: Control Juggling in Research Situations. / Eguia Huerta, Maria.
in: Social Epistemology, Jahrgang 34, Nr. 4, 03.07.2020, S. 370-381.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Eguia Huerta M. Knowledge Decolonization à la Grounded Theory: Control Juggling in Research Situations. Social Epistemology. 2020 Jul 3;34(4):370-381. doi: 10.1080/02691728.2019.1706118

Bibtex

@article{8da9cb3bb64b4e1282b9c0e2cd417443,
title = "Knowledge Decolonization {\`a} la Grounded Theory: Control Juggling in Research Situations",
abstract = "Knowledge production is not free of political connotations. The researcher defines and moulds the research situation in which she will be gathering the data. Simultaneously, she will be also conditioned by the ways the situation is constructing her as a researcher. I shall elucidate some of aspects that influence how research situations are constructed based on the examples of my own empirical work. I will show some of the multiple negotiations contained in the process, influenced by the fact that I was a Spanish urban young woman doing research in a rural region of Bolivia for the German international cooperation for development (DED). Two sorts of control will be outlined and an argument for control juggling within a decolonial move of humanizing research will be sketched. I shall argue that Kathy Charmaz{\textquoteright}s constructivist Grounded Theory is flexible and systematic enough to make space for other ways of knowing, to grasp these subtle multifaceted processes of constructing a research situation while facilitating the necessary reflexivity for transformation purposes, contributing to a wider project of decolonizing knowledge production.",
keywords = "Transdisciplinary studies, knowlegde decolonisation, Grounded Theory, collaborative research, research situations, control juggling, humanizing research",
author = "{Eguia Huerta}, Maria",
year = "2020",
month = jul,
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/02691728.2019.1706118",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "370--381",
journal = "Social Epistemology",
issn = "0269-1728",
publisher = "Routledge Taylor & Francis Group",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Knowledge Decolonization à la Grounded Theory

T2 - Control Juggling in Research Situations

AU - Eguia Huerta, Maria

PY - 2020/7/3

Y1 - 2020/7/3

N2 - Knowledge production is not free of political connotations. The researcher defines and moulds the research situation in which she will be gathering the data. Simultaneously, she will be also conditioned by the ways the situation is constructing her as a researcher. I shall elucidate some of aspects that influence how research situations are constructed based on the examples of my own empirical work. I will show some of the multiple negotiations contained in the process, influenced by the fact that I was a Spanish urban young woman doing research in a rural region of Bolivia for the German international cooperation for development (DED). Two sorts of control will be outlined and an argument for control juggling within a decolonial move of humanizing research will be sketched. I shall argue that Kathy Charmaz’s constructivist Grounded Theory is flexible and systematic enough to make space for other ways of knowing, to grasp these subtle multifaceted processes of constructing a research situation while facilitating the necessary reflexivity for transformation purposes, contributing to a wider project of decolonizing knowledge production.

AB - Knowledge production is not free of political connotations. The researcher defines and moulds the research situation in which she will be gathering the data. Simultaneously, she will be also conditioned by the ways the situation is constructing her as a researcher. I shall elucidate some of aspects that influence how research situations are constructed based on the examples of my own empirical work. I will show some of the multiple negotiations contained in the process, influenced by the fact that I was a Spanish urban young woman doing research in a rural region of Bolivia for the German international cooperation for development (DED). Two sorts of control will be outlined and an argument for control juggling within a decolonial move of humanizing research will be sketched. I shall argue that Kathy Charmaz’s constructivist Grounded Theory is flexible and systematic enough to make space for other ways of knowing, to grasp these subtle multifaceted processes of constructing a research situation while facilitating the necessary reflexivity for transformation purposes, contributing to a wider project of decolonizing knowledge production.

KW - Transdisciplinary studies

KW - knowlegde decolonisation

KW - Grounded Theory

KW - collaborative research

KW - research situations

KW - control juggling

KW - humanizing research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85079417292&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02691728.2019.1706118

DO - 10.1080/02691728.2019.1706118

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 34

SP - 370

EP - 381

JO - Social Epistemology

JF - Social Epistemology

SN - 0269-1728

IS - 4

ER -

DOI