Knowledge Decolonization à la Grounded Theory: Control Juggling in Research Situations
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet
Standard
in: Social Epistemology, Jahrgang 34, Nr. 4, 03.07.2020, S. 370-381.
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Knowledge Decolonization à la Grounded Theory
T2 - Control Juggling in Research Situations
AU - Eguia Huerta, Maria
PY - 2020/7/3
Y1 - 2020/7/3
N2 - Knowledge production is not free of political connotations. The researcher defines and moulds the research situation in which she will be gathering the data. Simultaneously, she will be also conditioned by the ways the situation is constructing her as a researcher. I shall elucidate some of aspects that influence how research situations are constructed based on the examples of my own empirical work. I will show some of the multiple negotiations contained in the process, influenced by the fact that I was a Spanish urban young woman doing research in a rural region of Bolivia for the German international cooperation for development (DED). Two sorts of control will be outlined and an argument for control juggling within a decolonial move of humanizing research will be sketched. I shall argue that Kathy Charmaz’s constructivist Grounded Theory is flexible and systematic enough to make space for other ways of knowing, to grasp these subtle multifaceted processes of constructing a research situation while facilitating the necessary reflexivity for transformation purposes, contributing to a wider project of decolonizing knowledge production.
AB - Knowledge production is not free of political connotations. The researcher defines and moulds the research situation in which she will be gathering the data. Simultaneously, she will be also conditioned by the ways the situation is constructing her as a researcher. I shall elucidate some of aspects that influence how research situations are constructed based on the examples of my own empirical work. I will show some of the multiple negotiations contained in the process, influenced by the fact that I was a Spanish urban young woman doing research in a rural region of Bolivia for the German international cooperation for development (DED). Two sorts of control will be outlined and an argument for control juggling within a decolonial move of humanizing research will be sketched. I shall argue that Kathy Charmaz’s constructivist Grounded Theory is flexible and systematic enough to make space for other ways of knowing, to grasp these subtle multifaceted processes of constructing a research situation while facilitating the necessary reflexivity for transformation purposes, contributing to a wider project of decolonizing knowledge production.
KW - Transdisciplinary studies
KW - knowlegde decolonisation
KW - Grounded Theory
KW - collaborative research
KW - research situations
KW - control juggling
KW - humanizing research
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85079417292&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/02691728.2019.1706118
DO - 10.1080/02691728.2019.1706118
M3 - Journal articles
VL - 34
SP - 370
EP - 381
JO - Social Epistemology
JF - Social Epistemology
SN - 0269-1728
IS - 4
ER -