Introduction: Why does management education need reinventing?

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenKapitelbegutachtet

Standard

Introduction: Why does management education need reinventing? / Beyes, Timon; Parker, Martin; Steyaert, Chris.
The Routledge Companion to Reinventing Management Education. Hrsg. / Chris Steyaert; Timon Beyes; Martin Parker. 1. Aufl. London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2016. S. 1-20.

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenKapitelbegutachtet

Harvard

Beyes, T, Parker, M & Steyaert, C 2016, Introduction: Why does management education need reinventing? in C Steyaert, T Beyes & M Parker (Hrsg.), The Routledge Companion to Reinventing Management Education. 1 Aufl., Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, London, S. 1-20. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315852430

APA

Beyes, T., Parker, M., & Steyaert, C. (2016). Introduction: Why does management education need reinventing? In C. Steyaert, T. Beyes, & M. Parker (Hrsg.), The Routledge Companion to Reinventing Management Education (1 Aufl., S. 1-20). Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315852430

Vancouver

Beyes T, Parker M, Steyaert C. Introduction: Why does management education need reinventing? in Steyaert C, Beyes T, Parker M, Hrsg., The Routledge Companion to Reinventing Management Education. 1 Aufl. London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. 2016. S. 1-20 doi: 10.4324/9781315852430

Bibtex

@inbook{bc9873ffdd124c3b95b7185eb0b7a120,
title = "Introduction: Why does management education need reinventing?",
abstract = "At a time when a pervasive performative culture encourages scholars who work at higher ranked business schools to invest their energies in their research profiles, that is to say, publication outputs and external funding, why bother to focus on teaching, learning and education? And why in particular on {\textquoteleft}The humanities and social sciences in management education{\textquoteright}, to quote the rather clunky working title that guided us during the creation of this Companion? Why are we trying to conjoin the management school with subjects like philosophy, art, sociology, cultural theory and history? Why does business and management education, characterized by healthy enrolments and a buoyant labour market for academics, need reinventing anyway? Apart from the lazy or cynical response that editing and writing for such a book also yields an entry on the CVs of all the academics involved, we believe there are a number of important reasons to care about the arguments and ideas expressed in this book.",
keywords = "Digital media, Media and communication studies, Cultural studies",
author = "Timon Beyes and Martin Parker and Chris Steyaert",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.4324/9781315852430",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780415727372",
pages = "1--20",
editor = "Chris Steyaert and Timon Beyes and Martin Parker",
booktitle = "The Routledge Companion to Reinventing Management Education",
publisher = "Routledge Taylor & Francis Group",
address = "United Kingdom",
edition = "1",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Introduction

T2 - Why does management education need reinventing?

AU - Beyes, Timon

AU - Parker, Martin

AU - Steyaert, Chris

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - At a time when a pervasive performative culture encourages scholars who work at higher ranked business schools to invest their energies in their research profiles, that is to say, publication outputs and external funding, why bother to focus on teaching, learning and education? And why in particular on ‘The humanities and social sciences in management education’, to quote the rather clunky working title that guided us during the creation of this Companion? Why are we trying to conjoin the management school with subjects like philosophy, art, sociology, cultural theory and history? Why does business and management education, characterized by healthy enrolments and a buoyant labour market for academics, need reinventing anyway? Apart from the lazy or cynical response that editing and writing for such a book also yields an entry on the CVs of all the academics involved, we believe there are a number of important reasons to care about the arguments and ideas expressed in this book.

AB - At a time when a pervasive performative culture encourages scholars who work at higher ranked business schools to invest their energies in their research profiles, that is to say, publication outputs and external funding, why bother to focus on teaching, learning and education? And why in particular on ‘The humanities and social sciences in management education’, to quote the rather clunky working title that guided us during the creation of this Companion? Why are we trying to conjoin the management school with subjects like philosophy, art, sociology, cultural theory and history? Why does business and management education, characterized by healthy enrolments and a buoyant labour market for academics, need reinventing anyway? Apart from the lazy or cynical response that editing and writing for such a book also yields an entry on the CVs of all the academics involved, we believe there are a number of important reasons to care about the arguments and ideas expressed in this book.

KW - Digital media

KW - Media and communication studies

KW - Cultural studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85082188835&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4324/9781315852430

DO - 10.4324/9781315852430

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780415727372

SP - 1

EP - 20

BT - The Routledge Companion to Reinventing Management Education

A2 - Steyaert, Chris

A2 - Beyes, Timon

A2 - Parker, Martin

PB - Routledge Taylor & Francis Group

CY - London

ER -

Links

DOI