Income inequality, status decline and support for the radical right

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenKapitel

Standard

Income inequality, status decline and support for the radical right. / Engler, Sarah; Weisstanner, David.
The European Social Model under Pressure: Liber Amicorum in Honour of Klaus Armingeon. Hrsg. / Romana Careja; Patrick Emmenegger; Nathalie Giger. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2020. S. 383-400.

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenKapitel

Harvard

Engler, S & Weisstanner, D 2020, Income inequality, status decline and support for the radical right. in R Careja, P Emmenegger & N Giger (Hrsg.), The European Social Model under Pressure: Liber Amicorum in Honour of Klaus Armingeon. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, S. 383-400. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27043-8_22

APA

Engler, S., & Weisstanner, D. (2020). Income inequality, status decline and support for the radical right. In R. Careja, P. Emmenegger, & N. Giger (Hrsg.), The European Social Model under Pressure: Liber Amicorum in Honour of Klaus Armingeon (S. 383-400). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27043-8_22

Vancouver

Engler S, Weisstanner D. Income inequality, status decline and support for the radical right. in Careja R, Emmenegger P, Giger N, Hrsg., The European Social Model under Pressure: Liber Amicorum in Honour of Klaus Armingeon. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. 2020. S. 383-400 Epub 2019 Jul 12. doi: 10.1007/978-3-658-27043-8_22

Bibtex

@inbook{7cb03d1cb8f14b38be21bb8da48d96f7,
title = "Income inequality, status decline and support for the radical right",
abstract = "Support for the radical right has risen in most Western democracies. Globalization and modernization processes are usually seen as the source of this development, reshaping political conflicts and producing new groups of people that feel {\textquoteleft}left behind{\textquoteright}. However, few studies test how the relatively common trends in globalization shape the variation in the timing and extent of radical right support across countries. Focusing on the economic dimension of the {\textquoteleft}losers of globalization{\textquoteright} theory, we argue that income inequality is a suitable indicator to measure the extent to which some groups have fallen behind and to capture the fear of decline in material well-being of people not (yet) at the bottom of the income distribution. The relative deterioration in material conditions, we argue further, translates into a lower subjective social status of vulnerable groups who then turn towards the radical right. By cultivating nativism and thus providing non-economic criteria of social status, the radical right becomes more attractive as societies become more unequal. We show evidence for our hypothesis by comparing vote shares for radical right parties in 20 Western democracies between 1980 and 2016. The findings indicate that rising income inequality substantially increases support for the radical right in the long run. In addition, rising inequality translates into lower subjective social status of nontertiary educated men and this process of status decline further contributes to radical right support. Hence, there are both material and non-material linkages between income inequality and radical right support.",
keywords = "Politics",
author = "Sarah Engler and David Weisstanner",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-658-27043-8_22",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-3-658-27042-1",
pages = "383--400",
editor = "Romana Careja and Patrick Emmenegger and Nathalie Giger",
booktitle = "The European Social Model under Pressure",
publisher = "Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden",
address = "Germany",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Income inequality, status decline and support for the radical right

AU - Engler, Sarah

AU - Weisstanner, David

N1 - © 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Support for the radical right has risen in most Western democracies. Globalization and modernization processes are usually seen as the source of this development, reshaping political conflicts and producing new groups of people that feel ‘left behind’. However, few studies test how the relatively common trends in globalization shape the variation in the timing and extent of radical right support across countries. Focusing on the economic dimension of the ‘losers of globalization’ theory, we argue that income inequality is a suitable indicator to measure the extent to which some groups have fallen behind and to capture the fear of decline in material well-being of people not (yet) at the bottom of the income distribution. The relative deterioration in material conditions, we argue further, translates into a lower subjective social status of vulnerable groups who then turn towards the radical right. By cultivating nativism and thus providing non-economic criteria of social status, the radical right becomes more attractive as societies become more unequal. We show evidence for our hypothesis by comparing vote shares for radical right parties in 20 Western democracies between 1980 and 2016. The findings indicate that rising income inequality substantially increases support for the radical right in the long run. In addition, rising inequality translates into lower subjective social status of nontertiary educated men and this process of status decline further contributes to radical right support. Hence, there are both material and non-material linkages between income inequality and radical right support.

AB - Support for the radical right has risen in most Western democracies. Globalization and modernization processes are usually seen as the source of this development, reshaping political conflicts and producing new groups of people that feel ‘left behind’. However, few studies test how the relatively common trends in globalization shape the variation in the timing and extent of radical right support across countries. Focusing on the economic dimension of the ‘losers of globalization’ theory, we argue that income inequality is a suitable indicator to measure the extent to which some groups have fallen behind and to capture the fear of decline in material well-being of people not (yet) at the bottom of the income distribution. The relative deterioration in material conditions, we argue further, translates into a lower subjective social status of vulnerable groups who then turn towards the radical right. By cultivating nativism and thus providing non-economic criteria of social status, the radical right becomes more attractive as societies become more unequal. We show evidence for our hypothesis by comparing vote shares for radical right parties in 20 Western democracies between 1980 and 2016. The findings indicate that rising income inequality substantially increases support for the radical right in the long run. In addition, rising inequality translates into lower subjective social status of nontertiary educated men and this process of status decline further contributes to radical right support. Hence, there are both material and non-material linkages between income inequality and radical right support.

KW - Politics

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/d34da6c7-6bdd-378b-974d-6bfb61efeb56/

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-658-27043-8_22

DO - 10.1007/978-3-658-27043-8_22

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-3-658-27042-1

SN - 3-658-27042-X

SP - 383

EP - 400

BT - The European Social Model under Pressure

A2 - Careja, Romana

A2 - Emmenegger, Patrick

A2 - Giger, Nathalie

PB - Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

CY - Wiesbaden

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Ästhetische Langeweile in der Gegenwartskunst
  2. Husserl, Edmund (1859-1938)
  3. The Law Behind Rule of Law Transfers
  4. Statutentheorie
  5. The role of solutes for grain refinement by (SiC)P
  6. Science text comprehension
  7. Introduction to the Assessment - Characteristics of the Region
  8. Mathematische Kompetenz bei Erwachsenen
  9. Response to comment on Screening for PBT chemicals among the "existing" and "new" chemicals of the EU
  10. Schwellenphänomene
  11. Toward industrial silicone 3D printing of soft robots
  12. Critical assessment of models for transport of engineered nanoparticles in saturated porous media
  13. Autotrophic and heterotrophic microalgae and cyanobacteria cultivation for food and feed
  14. CO2-Steuer oder Ausweitung des Emissionshandels
  15. Deep decarbonization in Germany: A macro-analysis of economic and political challenges of the 'Energiewende' (energy transition)
  16. Forecasting European interest rates in times of financial crisis – What insights do we get from international survey forecasts?
  17. Erdkabel
  18. The Implementation of the National Park Idea in Society
  19. Diversität und Heterogenität
  20. Microstructures, Corrosion and Mechanical Properties of Mg–Si Alloys as Biodegradable Implant Materials
  21. John Rawls
  22. Garzweiler II
  23. Pre-service teachers’ perceptions of school development
  24. Bionik
  25. Christian Boltanski's Failed Meta-Archive
  26. EU Asylum Policies
  27. "Forschendes Lernen in der Schule"
  28. Gene flow across large distances in the cavity-nesting wasp Deuteragenia subintermedia in a central European forest
  29. Robbins, Lionel Charles
  30. Germany must invest more in its future
  31. IPR für eine bessere Welt
  32. Competence Assessment in Education
  33. Effect of biaxial compressive stress state on the microstructure evolution and deformation compatibility of rolled sheet Mg alloy AZ31 at room temperature
  34. Paradoxe Korruption
  35. Engel der Effizienz
  36. The role of media for consumers' inflation expectation formation
  37. In situ compressive investigations on the effects of solid solution Gd on the texture and lattice strain evolution of Mg
  38. Die Schreibwerkstatt Mehrsprachigkeit an der Universität Hamburg
  39. How do international sanctions end?
  40. The legal dimensions of rule of law promotion in EU foreign policy
  41. Inventionen 1