Incidental jurisdiction in the award in “The ‘Enrica Lexie’ Incident (Italy v. India)” – Part II
Publikation: Andere wissenschaftliche Beiträge › Wissenschaftliche Beiträge in Foren oder Weblogs › Forschung
Standard
Incidental jurisdiction in the award in “The ‘Enrica Lexie’ Incident (Italy v. India)” – Part II. / Schatz, Valentin J.
4 S. Heidelberg : Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht. 2020. (Völkerrechtsblog - International Law & International Legal Thought).Publikation: Andere wissenschaftliche Beiträge › Wissenschaftliche Beiträge in Foren oder Weblogs › Forschung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - GEN
T1 - Incidental jurisdiction in the award in “The ‘Enrica Lexie’ Incident (Italy v. India)” – Part II
AU - Schatz, Valentin J.
PY - 2020/7/24
Y1 - 2020/7/24
N2 - After having addressed the existence, requirements and limits of incidental jurisdiction of UNCLOS tribunals under Article 288(1) UNCLOS in the first post, this post turns to the approach taken by the arbitral award in Italy v. India.
AB - After having addressed the existence, requirements and limits of incidental jurisdiction of UNCLOS tribunals under Article 288(1) UNCLOS in the first post, this post turns to the approach taken by the arbitral award in Italy v. India.
KW - Law
U2 - 10.17176/20200724-115515-0
DO - 10.17176/20200724-115515-0
M3 - Articles in scientific forums or blogs
T3 - Völkerrechtsblog - International Law & International Legal Thought
PB - Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht
CY - Heidelberg
ER -