How to measure the substantive representation of traditionally excluded groups in comparative research: a literature review and new data

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

How to measure the substantive representation of traditionally excluded groups in comparative research: a literature review and new data. / Kroeber, Corinna.
in: Representation, Jahrgang 54, Nr. 3, 03.07.2018, S. 241-259.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{7a852dda958340f0b1952aa0237050ee,
title = "How to measure the substantive representation of traditionally excluded groups in comparative research: a literature review and new data",
abstract = "This article provides the necessary tools to advance comparative research studying the substantive representation of ethnic minorities and women. Firstly, I clarify how the various indicators for individual representatives{\textquoteright} and parliaments{\textquoteright} considerateness of the interests of traditionally excluded groups used in earlier (mostly single-country) studies relate to each other and discuss the advantages and drawbacks of different measures for quantitative comparative research. Secondly, the present article introduces new data comprising three indicators for the substantive representation of ethnic minorities.",
keywords = "Politics",
author = "Corinna Kroeber",
year = "2018",
month = jul,
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/00344893.2018.1504112",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "241--259",
journal = "Representation",
issn = "0034-4893",
publisher = "Routledge Taylor & Francis Group",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - How to measure the substantive representation of traditionally excluded groups in comparative research

T2 - a literature review and new data

AU - Kroeber, Corinna

PY - 2018/7/3

Y1 - 2018/7/3

N2 - This article provides the necessary tools to advance comparative research studying the substantive representation of ethnic minorities and women. Firstly, I clarify how the various indicators for individual representatives’ and parliaments’ considerateness of the interests of traditionally excluded groups used in earlier (mostly single-country) studies relate to each other and discuss the advantages and drawbacks of different measures for quantitative comparative research. Secondly, the present article introduces new data comprising three indicators for the substantive representation of ethnic minorities.

AB - This article provides the necessary tools to advance comparative research studying the substantive representation of ethnic minorities and women. Firstly, I clarify how the various indicators for individual representatives’ and parliaments’ considerateness of the interests of traditionally excluded groups used in earlier (mostly single-country) studies relate to each other and discuss the advantages and drawbacks of different measures for quantitative comparative research. Secondly, the present article introduces new data comprising three indicators for the substantive representation of ethnic minorities.

KW - Politics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052124764&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00344893.2018.1504112

DO - 10.1080/00344893.2018.1504112

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85052124764

VL - 54

SP - 241

EP - 259

JO - Representation

JF - Representation

SN - 0034-4893

IS - 3

ER -

Dokumente

DOI