Governing global telecoupling toward environmental sustainability
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet
Standard
in: Ecology and Society, Jahrgang 25, Nr. 4, 21, 12.2020, S. 1-17.
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Governing global telecoupling toward environmental sustainability
AU - Newig, Jens
AU - Challies, Edward
AU - Cotta, Benedetta
AU - Lenschow, Andrea
AU - Schilling-Vacaflor, Almut
N1 - This work was funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) under grants no. CH 1643/2-1, LE 2396/4-1 and NE 1207/7-1 through the project “GOVERNECT - Governance of Environmental Sustainability in Telecoupled Systems of Global Inter-Regional Connectedness” (see https://sustainability-governance. Publisher Copyright: © 2020 by the author(s).
PY - 2020/12
Y1 - 2020/12
N2 - Telecoupling constitutes a particular class of globalized environmental issues that are neither local-cumulative, nor transboundary, nor concerning global commons, but that arise because of specific linkages between distal regions. Such telecoupled issues, e.g., associated with global commodity chains, waste flows, or migration patterns, have been receiving increasing attention from scholars of global land change science. Although governance research has mostly studied existing institutional responses to these issues, telecoupling opens up a problem-oriented perspective on issues of environmental sustainability that occur regionally, but that arise because of global linkages, and raises novel questions about how such issues are and could be governed in a global architecture. We draw insights from existing literature on globally interconnected phenomena to advance our understanding of governing telecoupling toward environmental sustainability. We first identify and discuss five particular challenges that telecoupling poses to global environmental governance: knowledge deficits, divergent interests, high transaction costs of cooperation, the weak legitimacy base of current governance arrangements, and policy incoherence and fragmentation. Second, we review conceptual literature that meaningfully address the governance of telecoupling, while utilizing differing terminologies, for example, through reference to “flows,” “chains,” or “multiscalar” issues. Building on this, we elaborate on how currently debated governance approaches respond to the identified challenges. We conclude with a brief note on where we believe the discussion on governance of telecoupling stands, and where we see directions for future research.
AB - Telecoupling constitutes a particular class of globalized environmental issues that are neither local-cumulative, nor transboundary, nor concerning global commons, but that arise because of specific linkages between distal regions. Such telecoupled issues, e.g., associated with global commodity chains, waste flows, or migration patterns, have been receiving increasing attention from scholars of global land change science. Although governance research has mostly studied existing institutional responses to these issues, telecoupling opens up a problem-oriented perspective on issues of environmental sustainability that occur regionally, but that arise because of global linkages, and raises novel questions about how such issues are and could be governed in a global architecture. We draw insights from existing literature on globally interconnected phenomena to advance our understanding of governing telecoupling toward environmental sustainability. We first identify and discuss five particular challenges that telecoupling poses to global environmental governance: knowledge deficits, divergent interests, high transaction costs of cooperation, the weak legitimacy base of current governance arrangements, and policy incoherence and fragmentation. Second, we review conceptual literature that meaningfully address the governance of telecoupling, while utilizing differing terminologies, for example, through reference to “flows,” “chains,” or “multiscalar” issues. Building on this, we elaborate on how currently debated governance approaches respond to the identified challenges. We conclude with a brief note on where we believe the discussion on governance of telecoupling stands, and where we see directions for future research.
KW - Environmental Governance
KW - environmental flows
KW - fragmentation
KW - global commodity chains
KW - global environmental governance
KW - inter-regional connectedness
KW - scale
KW - environmental flows
KW - fragmentation
KW - global commodity chains
KW - global environmental governance
KW - inter-regional connectedness
KW - scale
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85098587149&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5751/ES-11844-250421
DO - 10.5751/ES-11844-250421
M3 - Journal articles
VL - 25
SP - 1
EP - 17
JO - Ecology and Society
JF - Ecology and Society
SN - 1708-3087
IS - 4
M1 - 21
ER -