Gone and forgotten: facilitative effects of intercropping combinations did not carry over to affect barley performance in a follow‑up crop rotation

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Gone and forgotten : facilitative effects of intercropping combinations did not carry over to affect barley performance in a follow‑up crop rotation. / Kumar, Amit; Rosinger, Christoph; Chen, Hao et al.

in: Plant and Soil, Jahrgang 467, Nr. 1-2, 10.2021, S. 405-419.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Kumar A, Rosinger C, Chen H, Protic S, Bonkowski M, Temperton V. Gone and forgotten: facilitative effects of intercropping combinations did not carry over to affect barley performance in a follow‑up crop rotation. Plant and Soil. 2021 Okt;467(1-2):405-419. Epub 2021 Aug 12. doi: 10.1007/s11104-021-05104-7

Bibtex

@article{efb106fa096b4f58963cd0cbdac37386,
title = "Gone and forgotten: facilitative effects of intercropping combinations did not carry over to affect barley performance in a follow‑up crop rotation",
abstract = "Aim: Intercropping often leads to improved productivity of individual species compared to monocultures. We have practically little knowledge of facilitation effects in different intercropping systems and their importance in creating soil legacies that can indirectly affect the succeeding crop in a crop rotation through plant-soil feedback (PSF) effects. Methods: To test this, we used a two-phased field experiment where we combined intercropping and crop rotation. During intercropping, we grew maize, faba bean, and lupine in monocultures or two-species crop combinations. The following season, we grew winter barley on the soil previously used for intercropping to test PSF effects under field conditions. Results: We found evidence for facilitative effects on aboveground biomass production that were species-specific with faba bean and maize biomass benefitting when intercropped compared to their expected biomasses in monocultures. Lupine, in contrast, performed best in monocultures. After the intercropping phase, total soil mineral nitrogen was higher in legume monocultures creating soil legacies but this did not affect soil microbial parameters and barley biomass production in the follow-up rotation phase. Conclusions: We found support for species-specific positive and negative interactions in intercropping. Our results also demonstrated that soil legacies play no significant role under moderately high nutrient environments.",
keywords = "Ecosystems Research, Soil legacies, Plant-soil feedback effects, Arbuscular mycorrhiza colonization, Enzyme activities, Microbial biomass, belowground interactions, Soil legacies, Plant-soil feedback effects, arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization, Enzyme activities, Microbial biomass, Belowground interactions",
author = "Amit Kumar and Christoph Rosinger and Hao Chen and Siobhan Protic and Michael Bonkowski and Vicky Temperton",
note = "We greatly acknowledge field assistance from Thomas Niemeyer, Christoph Stegen, Vladimir Vakhtinskii, Pola Rief, Laura St{\"o}rzer, Hannes Schempp, Johanna Wille, and Mira Hesselman. This research was financed by the BonaRes soil sustainability program of the German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) within the {\textquoteleft}INPLAMINT – Increasing agricultural nutrient-use efficiency by optimizing plant-soil-microorganisms interactions{\textquoteright} project with the grant numbers: 031B0508H and 031B0508F. Authors would like to sincerely thank the editor and three anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021, The Author(s).",
year = "2021",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1007/s11104-021-05104-7",
language = "English",
volume = "467",
pages = "405--419",
journal = "Plant and Soil",
issn = "0032-079X",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "1-2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gone and forgotten

T2 - facilitative effects of intercropping combinations did not carry over to affect barley performance in a follow‑up crop rotation

AU - Kumar, Amit

AU - Rosinger, Christoph

AU - Chen, Hao

AU - Protic, Siobhan

AU - Bonkowski, Michael

AU - Temperton, Vicky

N1 - We greatly acknowledge field assistance from Thomas Niemeyer, Christoph Stegen, Vladimir Vakhtinskii, Pola Rief, Laura Störzer, Hannes Schempp, Johanna Wille, and Mira Hesselman. This research was financed by the BonaRes soil sustainability program of the German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) within the ‘INPLAMINT – Increasing agricultural nutrient-use efficiency by optimizing plant-soil-microorganisms interactions’ project with the grant numbers: 031B0508H and 031B0508F. Authors would like to sincerely thank the editor and three anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions. Publisher Copyright: © 2021, The Author(s).

PY - 2021/10

Y1 - 2021/10

N2 - Aim: Intercropping often leads to improved productivity of individual species compared to monocultures. We have practically little knowledge of facilitation effects in different intercropping systems and their importance in creating soil legacies that can indirectly affect the succeeding crop in a crop rotation through plant-soil feedback (PSF) effects. Methods: To test this, we used a two-phased field experiment where we combined intercropping and crop rotation. During intercropping, we grew maize, faba bean, and lupine in monocultures or two-species crop combinations. The following season, we grew winter barley on the soil previously used for intercropping to test PSF effects under field conditions. Results: We found evidence for facilitative effects on aboveground biomass production that were species-specific with faba bean and maize biomass benefitting when intercropped compared to their expected biomasses in monocultures. Lupine, in contrast, performed best in monocultures. After the intercropping phase, total soil mineral nitrogen was higher in legume monocultures creating soil legacies but this did not affect soil microbial parameters and barley biomass production in the follow-up rotation phase. Conclusions: We found support for species-specific positive and negative interactions in intercropping. Our results also demonstrated that soil legacies play no significant role under moderately high nutrient environments.

AB - Aim: Intercropping often leads to improved productivity of individual species compared to monocultures. We have practically little knowledge of facilitation effects in different intercropping systems and their importance in creating soil legacies that can indirectly affect the succeeding crop in a crop rotation through plant-soil feedback (PSF) effects. Methods: To test this, we used a two-phased field experiment where we combined intercropping and crop rotation. During intercropping, we grew maize, faba bean, and lupine in monocultures or two-species crop combinations. The following season, we grew winter barley on the soil previously used for intercropping to test PSF effects under field conditions. Results: We found evidence for facilitative effects on aboveground biomass production that were species-specific with faba bean and maize biomass benefitting when intercropped compared to their expected biomasses in monocultures. Lupine, in contrast, performed best in monocultures. After the intercropping phase, total soil mineral nitrogen was higher in legume monocultures creating soil legacies but this did not affect soil microbial parameters and barley biomass production in the follow-up rotation phase. Conclusions: We found support for species-specific positive and negative interactions in intercropping. Our results also demonstrated that soil legacies play no significant role under moderately high nutrient environments.

KW - Ecosystems Research

KW - Soil legacies

KW - Plant-soil feedback effects

KW - Arbuscular mycorrhiza colonization

KW - Enzyme activities

KW - Microbial biomass

KW - belowground interactions

KW - Soil legacies

KW - Plant-soil feedback effects

KW - arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization

KW - Enzyme activities

KW - Microbial biomass

KW - Belowground interactions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85112368959&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11104-021-05104-7

DO - 10.1007/s11104-021-05104-7

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 467

SP - 405

EP - 419

JO - Plant and Soil

JF - Plant and Soil

SN - 0032-079X

IS - 1-2

ER -

Dokumente

DOI