Exports and productivity: comparable evidence for 14 countries

Publikation: Arbeits- oder Diskussionspapiere und BerichteArbeits- oder Diskussionspapiere

Standard

Exports and productivity : comparable evidence for 14 countries. / Wagner, Joachim.

Lüneburg : Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre der Universität Lüneburg, 2007. (Working paper series in economics; Nr. 65).

Publikation: Arbeits- oder Diskussionspapiere und BerichteArbeits- oder Diskussionspapiere

Harvard

Wagner, J 2007 'Exports and productivity: comparable evidence for 14 countries' Working paper series in economics, Nr. 65, Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre der Universität Lüneburg, Lüneburg.

APA

Wagner, J. (2007). Exports and productivity: comparable evidence for 14 countries. (Working paper series in economics; Nr. 65). Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre der Universität Lüneburg.

Vancouver

Wagner J. Exports and productivity: comparable evidence for 14 countries. Lüneburg: Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre der Universität Lüneburg. 2007. (Working paper series in economics; 65).

Bibtex

@techreport{517961004b81480788a124784b43c5be,
title = "Exports and productivity: comparable evidence for 14 countries",
abstract = "We use comparable micro level panel data for 14 countries and a set of identically specified empirical models to investigate the relationship between exports and productivity. Our overall results are in line with the big picture that is by now familiar from the literature: Exporters are more productive than non-exporters when observed and unobserved heterogeneity are controlled for, and these exporter productivity premia tend to increase with the share of exports in total sales; there is strong evidence in favour of self-selection of more productive firms into export markets, but nearly no evidence in favour of the learning-by-exporting hypothesis. We document that the exporter premia differ considerably across countries in identically specified empirical models. In a meta-analysis of our results we find that countries that are more open and have more effective government report higher productivity premia. However, the level of development per se does not appear to be an explanation for the observed cross-country differences.",
keywords = "Economics, exports, productivity, micro data, international comparison",
author = "Joachim Wagner",
note = "Literaturverz. S. 25 - 27",
year = "2007",
language = "English",
series = "Working paper series in economics",
publisher = "Institut f{\"u}r Volkswirtschaftslehre der Universit{\"a}t L{\"u}neburg",
number = "65",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Institut f{\"u}r Volkswirtschaftslehre der Universit{\"a}t L{\"u}neburg",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Exports and productivity

T2 - comparable evidence for 14 countries

AU - Wagner, Joachim

N1 - Literaturverz. S. 25 - 27

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - We use comparable micro level panel data for 14 countries and a set of identically specified empirical models to investigate the relationship between exports and productivity. Our overall results are in line with the big picture that is by now familiar from the literature: Exporters are more productive than non-exporters when observed and unobserved heterogeneity are controlled for, and these exporter productivity premia tend to increase with the share of exports in total sales; there is strong evidence in favour of self-selection of more productive firms into export markets, but nearly no evidence in favour of the learning-by-exporting hypothesis. We document that the exporter premia differ considerably across countries in identically specified empirical models. In a meta-analysis of our results we find that countries that are more open and have more effective government report higher productivity premia. However, the level of development per se does not appear to be an explanation for the observed cross-country differences.

AB - We use comparable micro level panel data for 14 countries and a set of identically specified empirical models to investigate the relationship between exports and productivity. Our overall results are in line with the big picture that is by now familiar from the literature: Exporters are more productive than non-exporters when observed and unobserved heterogeneity are controlled for, and these exporter productivity premia tend to increase with the share of exports in total sales; there is strong evidence in favour of self-selection of more productive firms into export markets, but nearly no evidence in favour of the learning-by-exporting hypothesis. We document that the exporter premia differ considerably across countries in identically specified empirical models. In a meta-analysis of our results we find that countries that are more open and have more effective government report higher productivity premia. However, the level of development per se does not appear to be an explanation for the observed cross-country differences.

KW - Economics

KW - exports

KW - productivity

KW - micro data

KW - international comparison

M3 - Working papers

T3 - Working paper series in economics

BT - Exports and productivity

PB - Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre der Universität Lüneburg

CY - Lüneburg

ER -

Dokumente