Environmental Management Accounting (EMA) as a Support for Cleaner Production

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenAufsätze in SammelwerkenForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Environmental Management Accounting (EMA) as a Support for Cleaner Production. / Schaltegger, Stefan; Bennett, Martin; Burritt, Roger L. et al.

Environmental Management Accounting for Cleaner Production. Hrsg. / Stefan Schaltegger. [Dordrecht] : Springer Science+Business Media, 2008. S. 3-26 (Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science; Band 24).

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenAufsätze in SammelwerkenForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

Schaltegger, S, Bennett, M, Burritt, RL & Jasch, C 2008, Environmental Management Accounting (EMA) as a Support for Cleaner Production. in S Schaltegger (Hrsg.), Environmental Management Accounting for Cleaner Production. Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science, Bd. 24, Springer Science+Business Media, [Dordrecht], S. 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8913-8_1

APA

Schaltegger, S., Bennett, M., Burritt, R. L., & Jasch, C. (2008). Environmental Management Accounting (EMA) as a Support for Cleaner Production. in S. Schaltegger (Hrsg.), Environmental Management Accounting for Cleaner Production (S. 3-26). (Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science; Band 24). Springer Science+Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8913-8_1

Vancouver

Schaltegger S, Bennett M, Burritt RL, Jasch C. Environmental Management Accounting (EMA) as a Support for Cleaner Production. in Schaltegger S, Hrsg., Environmental Management Accounting for Cleaner Production. [Dordrecht]: Springer Science+Business Media. 2008. S. 3-26. (Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science). doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-8913-8_1

Bibtex

@inbook{55590d54720e4d28afebbca1611ad6db,
title = "Environmental Management Accounting (EMA) as a Support for Cleaner Production",
abstract = "The potential for Cleaner Production (CP) to benefit business is well-demonstrated, but it is not yet as widely adopted as might be expected. This is unlikely to be entirely because of the lack of adequate information - other possible reasons could be that (i) CP is commonly seen as being only relevant to manufacturing, (ii) the institutional framework does not encourage the adoption of CP as well as it might do, and (iii) there is no single one-to-one relationship between organisational change (such as a move to CP) and accounting change. This contribution addresses the last-mentioned reason for hindrances to the wider adoption of CP and investigates the relationship between CP developments and innovations in relation to information requirements and accounting ...",
keywords = "Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics, Life Cycle Assessment, Efficiency Strategy, Clean Production, Social Life Cycle Assessment, Corporate Sustainability",
author = "Stefan Schaltegger and Martin Bennett and Burritt, {Roger L.} and Christine Jasch",
note = "Literaturverz. S. 24 - 26",
year = "2008",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-1-4020-8913-8_1",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-1-4020-8912-1",
series = "Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science",
publisher = "Springer Science+Business Media",
pages = "3--26",
editor = "Stefan Schaltegger",
booktitle = "Environmental Management Accounting for Cleaner Production",
address = "Germany",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Environmental Management Accounting (EMA) as a Support for Cleaner Production

AU - Schaltegger, Stefan

AU - Bennett, Martin

AU - Burritt, Roger L.

AU - Jasch, Christine

N1 - Literaturverz. S. 24 - 26

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - The potential for Cleaner Production (CP) to benefit business is well-demonstrated, but it is not yet as widely adopted as might be expected. This is unlikely to be entirely because of the lack of adequate information - other possible reasons could be that (i) CP is commonly seen as being only relevant to manufacturing, (ii) the institutional framework does not encourage the adoption of CP as well as it might do, and (iii) there is no single one-to-one relationship between organisational change (such as a move to CP) and accounting change. This contribution addresses the last-mentioned reason for hindrances to the wider adoption of CP and investigates the relationship between CP developments and innovations in relation to information requirements and accounting ...

AB - The potential for Cleaner Production (CP) to benefit business is well-demonstrated, but it is not yet as widely adopted as might be expected. This is unlikely to be entirely because of the lack of adequate information - other possible reasons could be that (i) CP is commonly seen as being only relevant to manufacturing, (ii) the institutional framework does not encourage the adoption of CP as well as it might do, and (iii) there is no single one-to-one relationship between organisational change (such as a move to CP) and accounting change. This contribution addresses the last-mentioned reason for hindrances to the wider adoption of CP and investigates the relationship between CP developments and innovations in relation to information requirements and accounting ...

KW - Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics

KW - Life Cycle Assessment

KW - Efficiency Strategy

KW - Clean Production

KW - Social Life Cycle Assessment

KW - Corporate Sustainability

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/35d3e6b1-9a06-31f2-8ba2-53df90b533fb/

U2 - 10.1007/978-1-4020-8913-8_1

DO - 10.1007/978-1-4020-8913-8_1

M3 - Contributions to collected editions/anthologies

SN - 978-1-4020-8912-1

T3 - Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science

SP - 3

EP - 26

BT - Environmental Management Accounting for Cleaner Production

A2 - Schaltegger, Stefan

PB - Springer Science+Business Media

CY - [Dordrecht]

ER -

DOI