Energy-Capital-Labor Substitution and the Economic Effects of CO2 Abatement: Evidence for Germany

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Energy-Capital-Labor Substitution and the Economic Effects of CO2 Abatement: Evidence for Germany. / Kemfert, Claudia; Welsch, Heinz.
in: Journal of Policy Modeling, Jahrgang 22, Nr. 6, 01.11.2000, S. 641-660.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{ae30131117b849f587a788d5c8597dae,
title = "Energy-Capital-Labor Substitution and the Economic Effects of CO2 Abatement: Evidence for Germany",
abstract = "Although the economic effects of CO2 abatement depend substantially on the degree to which capital and labor can substitute for energy, the issue of energy-capital-labor substitution is surrounded by considerable uncertainty. In this article we use econometrically estimated, sectorally differentiated elasticities of substitution for Germany to shed some light on this issue. The elasticity estimates are used within a dynamic multisector CGE model to assess the economic effects of CO2 emission limits for Germany. In particular, we consider the implementation of emission limits by means of a carbon tax, assuming two alternative ways of tax revenue recycling, i.e., lump-sum transfer to private households versus labor cost reduction. The results are compared with results based on {"}standard{"} substitution elasticities from the literature. Because the estimated elasticities are on average higher and closer to unity than the {"}standard{"} elasticities, we get lower tax rates and tax revenues, and a more stable revenue/GDP ratio. In the case of using the tax revenue to reduce labor costs, the smaller revenue translates into a less favorable (but still positive) effect on employment and GDP. If the revenue is transferred to private households, the sensitivity of GDP with respect to the elasticities is rather negligible, whereas its various components are affected somewhat stronger.",
keywords = "Economics",
author = "Claudia Kemfert and Heinz Welsch",
year = "2000",
month = nov,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/s0161-8938(98)00036-2",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "641--660",
journal = "Journal of Policy Modeling",
issn = "0161-8938",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Energy-Capital-Labor Substitution and the Economic Effects of CO2 Abatement

T2 - Evidence for Germany

AU - Kemfert, Claudia

AU - Welsch, Heinz

PY - 2000/11/1

Y1 - 2000/11/1

N2 - Although the economic effects of CO2 abatement depend substantially on the degree to which capital and labor can substitute for energy, the issue of energy-capital-labor substitution is surrounded by considerable uncertainty. In this article we use econometrically estimated, sectorally differentiated elasticities of substitution for Germany to shed some light on this issue. The elasticity estimates are used within a dynamic multisector CGE model to assess the economic effects of CO2 emission limits for Germany. In particular, we consider the implementation of emission limits by means of a carbon tax, assuming two alternative ways of tax revenue recycling, i.e., lump-sum transfer to private households versus labor cost reduction. The results are compared with results based on "standard" substitution elasticities from the literature. Because the estimated elasticities are on average higher and closer to unity than the "standard" elasticities, we get lower tax rates and tax revenues, and a more stable revenue/GDP ratio. In the case of using the tax revenue to reduce labor costs, the smaller revenue translates into a less favorable (but still positive) effect on employment and GDP. If the revenue is transferred to private households, the sensitivity of GDP with respect to the elasticities is rather negligible, whereas its various components are affected somewhat stronger.

AB - Although the economic effects of CO2 abatement depend substantially on the degree to which capital and labor can substitute for energy, the issue of energy-capital-labor substitution is surrounded by considerable uncertainty. In this article we use econometrically estimated, sectorally differentiated elasticities of substitution for Germany to shed some light on this issue. The elasticity estimates are used within a dynamic multisector CGE model to assess the economic effects of CO2 emission limits for Germany. In particular, we consider the implementation of emission limits by means of a carbon tax, assuming two alternative ways of tax revenue recycling, i.e., lump-sum transfer to private households versus labor cost reduction. The results are compared with results based on "standard" substitution elasticities from the literature. Because the estimated elasticities are on average higher and closer to unity than the "standard" elasticities, we get lower tax rates and tax revenues, and a more stable revenue/GDP ratio. In the case of using the tax revenue to reduce labor costs, the smaller revenue translates into a less favorable (but still positive) effect on employment and GDP. If the revenue is transferred to private households, the sensitivity of GDP with respect to the elasticities is rather negligible, whereas its various components are affected somewhat stronger.

KW - Economics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0000754704&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/s0161-8938(98)00036-2

DO - 10.1016/s0161-8938(98)00036-2

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:0000754704

VL - 22

SP - 641

EP - 660

JO - Journal of Policy Modeling

JF - Journal of Policy Modeling

SN - 0161-8938

IS - 6

ER -

DOI