1. //
  2. Start
  3. //
  4. Publikationen
  5. Efficacy of trapping techniques (pitfall...
  6. Formate
  7. //

Efficacy of trapping techniques (pitfall, ramp and arboreal traps) for capturing spiders

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Standard

Efficacy of trapping techniques (pitfall, ramp and arboreal traps) for capturing spiders. / Matevski, Dragan; Cvetkovska-Gjorgjievska, Aleksandra; Prelić, Dana et al.

in: Biologia, Jahrgang 75, Nr. 12, 12.2020, S. 2315-2319.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Harvard

Matevski, D, Cvetkovska-Gjorgjievska, A, Prelić, D, Hristovski, S, Naumova, M & Delltshev, C 2020, 'Efficacy of trapping techniques (pitfall, ramp and arboreal traps) for capturing spiders', Biologia, Jg. 75, Nr. 12, S. 2315-2319. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-020-00475-1

APA

Matevski, D., Cvetkovska-Gjorgjievska, A., Prelić, D., Hristovski, S., Naumova, M., & Delltshev, C. (2020). Efficacy of trapping techniques (pitfall, ramp and arboreal traps) for capturing spiders. Biologia, 75(12), 2315-2319. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-020-00475-1

Vancouver

Matevski D, Cvetkovska-Gjorgjievska A, Prelić D, Hristovski S, Naumova M, Delltshev C. Efficacy of trapping techniques (pitfall, ramp and arboreal traps) for capturing spiders. Biologia. 2020 Dez;75(12):2315-2319. doi: 10.2478/s11756-020-00475-1

Bibtex

@article{ea27226f40b24201b735ab95ed8ad6b4,
title = "Efficacy of trapping techniques (pitfall, ramp and arboreal traps) for capturing spiders",
abstract = "Pitfall traps are the most commonly used method for capturing spiders. Other inexpensive methods such as ramp traps and arboreal traps are also used. Ramp traps are used mostly in situations where you cannot or do not wish to disturb the soil, while arboreal traps are used to determine the structure of spider assemblages living on tree trunks and in the canopy. Spiders were sampled from 17 localities on Kozuf Mt. and the effectiveness of four different trapping methods was compared. Overall, the largest amount of species and individuals was captured in pitfall traps. However, some of the species were only captured with ramp and arboreal traps. This, along with the previously mentioned characteristics of ramp and arboreal traps confirms the usefulness of these trapping methods for a more accurate assessment of spider biodiversity.",
keywords = "Araneae, Comparing methodologies, Trap efficiency, Biology",
author = "Dragan Matevski and Aleksandra Cvetkovska-Gjorgjievska and Dana Preli{\'c} and Slavco Hristovski and Maria Naumova and Christo Delltshev",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020, Institute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Sciences.",
year = "2020",
month = dec,
doi = "10.2478/s11756-020-00475-1",
language = "English",
volume = "75",
pages = "2315--2319",
journal = "Biologia",
issn = "0006-3088",
publisher = "Walter de Gruyter GmbH",
number = "12",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Efficacy of trapping techniques (pitfall, ramp and arboreal traps) for capturing spiders

AU - Matevski, Dragan

AU - Cvetkovska-Gjorgjievska, Aleksandra

AU - Prelić, Dana

AU - Hristovski, Slavco

AU - Naumova, Maria

AU - Delltshev, Christo

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2020, Institute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Sciences.

PY - 2020/12

Y1 - 2020/12

N2 - Pitfall traps are the most commonly used method for capturing spiders. Other inexpensive methods such as ramp traps and arboreal traps are also used. Ramp traps are used mostly in situations where you cannot or do not wish to disturb the soil, while arboreal traps are used to determine the structure of spider assemblages living on tree trunks and in the canopy. Spiders were sampled from 17 localities on Kozuf Mt. and the effectiveness of four different trapping methods was compared. Overall, the largest amount of species and individuals was captured in pitfall traps. However, some of the species were only captured with ramp and arboreal traps. This, along with the previously mentioned characteristics of ramp and arboreal traps confirms the usefulness of these trapping methods for a more accurate assessment of spider biodiversity.

AB - Pitfall traps are the most commonly used method for capturing spiders. Other inexpensive methods such as ramp traps and arboreal traps are also used. Ramp traps are used mostly in situations where you cannot or do not wish to disturb the soil, while arboreal traps are used to determine the structure of spider assemblages living on tree trunks and in the canopy. Spiders were sampled from 17 localities on Kozuf Mt. and the effectiveness of four different trapping methods was compared. Overall, the largest amount of species and individuals was captured in pitfall traps. However, some of the species were only captured with ramp and arboreal traps. This, along with the previously mentioned characteristics of ramp and arboreal traps confirms the usefulness of these trapping methods for a more accurate assessment of spider biodiversity.

KW - Araneae

KW - Comparing methodologies

KW - Trap efficiency

KW - Biology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85083771744&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2478/s11756-020-00475-1

DO - 10.2478/s11756-020-00475-1

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85083771744

VL - 75

SP - 2315

EP - 2319

JO - Biologia

JF - Biologia

SN - 0006-3088

IS - 12

ER -

In der gleichen Zeitschrift

Distribution and community structure of araneocoenoses (Araneae) along an altitudinal gradient on Kozuf Mountain (North Macedonia)

Matevski, D., Cvetkovska-Gjorgjievska, A., Prelić, D., Hristovski, S., Naumova, M. & Deltshev, C., 01.11.2020, in: Biologia. 75, 11, S. 1963-1976 14 S.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Weitere Publikationen dieser Person(en)

Canopy structure influences arthropod communities within and beyond tree identity effects: Insights from combining LiDAR data, insecticidal fogging and machine learning regression modelling

Wildermuth, B., Penanhoat, A., Sennhenn-Reulen, H., Matevski, D., Drescher, J., Aubry-Kientz, M., Seidel, D. & Schuldt, A., 01.03.2024, in: Ecological Indicators. 160, 12 S., 111901.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Correction to: Conifers and non-native tree species shift trophic niches of generalist arthropod predators in central european beech forests (BMC Ecology and Evolution, (2023), 23, 1, (3), 10.1186/s12862-023-02105-1)

Wildermuth, B., Fardiansah, R., Matevski, D., Lu, JZ. Z., Kriegel, P., Scheu, S. & Schuldt, A., 12.2023, in: BMC Ecology and Evolution. 23, 1, 1 S., 8.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Kommentare / Debatten / Berichte › Forschung

Introduction of non-native Douglas fir reduces leaf damage on beech saplings and mature trees in European beech forests

Matevski, D., Foltran, E., Lamersdorf, N. & Schuldt, A., 03.2023, in: Ecological Applications. 33, 2, e2786.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Non-native Douglas fir promotes epigeal spider density, but has a mixed effect on functional diversity

Matevski, D. & Schuldt, A., 03.2023, in: Biodiversity and Conservation. 32, 4, S. 1233-1250 18 S.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

Species diversity of forest floor biota in non-native Douglas-fir stands is similar to that of native stands

Glatthorn, J., Appleby, S., Balkenhol, N., Kriegel, P., Likulunga, L. E., Lu, J. Z., Matevski, D., Polle, A., Riebl, H., Rivera Pérez, C. A., Scheu, S., Seinsche, A., Schall, P., Schuldt, A., Wingender, S. & Ammer, C., 01.07.2023, in: Ecosphere. 14, 7, 16 S., e4609.

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet

DOI