Deficits in EU and US mandatory environmental information disclosure: Legal, comparative legal and economic facets of pollutant release invent.
Publikation: Bücher und Anthologien › Monografien › Forschung
Standard
Berlin: Springer, 2012. 487 S.
Publikation: Bücher und Anthologien › Monografien › Forschung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - BOOK
T1 - Deficits in EU and US mandatory environmental information disclosure
T2 - Legal, comparative legal and economic facets of pollutant release invent.
AU - Bünger, Dirk
N1 - Zugl.: Lüneburg, Univ., Diss., 2011
PY - 2012/1/1
Y1 - 2012/1/1
N2 - It is the publicity about the Pollutant Release Inventory's data which creates an incentive for firms to achieve emission reductions. Accordingly, public access to environmental information constitutes a core characteristic of the aforementioned inventory. Here, in essence, two facets arise. First, with regard to the collection, it is disputed whether such information, which may comprise confidential commercial and industrial information in the EU as well as trade secrets in the US, can be protected under fundamental and constitutional property rights respectively. Second, in the context of dissemination and utilisation, it is arguable whether the information indeed impacts polluters and produces an outcome that secures a certain level of environmental protection. The author responds to the first issue by taking the EU and US jurisdictions into account and strives to analyse how this novel form of Internet disclosure liberates market mechanisms in the quest for effective and efficient emission reductions.
AB - It is the publicity about the Pollutant Release Inventory's data which creates an incentive for firms to achieve emission reductions. Accordingly, public access to environmental information constitutes a core characteristic of the aforementioned inventory. Here, in essence, two facets arise. First, with regard to the collection, it is disputed whether such information, which may comprise confidential commercial and industrial information in the EU as well as trade secrets in the US, can be protected under fundamental and constitutional property rights respectively. Second, in the context of dissemination and utilisation, it is arguable whether the information indeed impacts polluters and produces an outcome that secures a certain level of environmental protection. The author responds to the first issue by taking the EU and US jurisdictions into account and strives to analyse how this novel form of Internet disclosure liberates market mechanisms in the quest for effective and efficient emission reductions.
KW - Management studies
KW - EU and US Comparative Constitutional Law
KW - Environmental Information Law
KW - European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register
KW - Innovative Pollution Reduction Approaches
KW - Toxics Release Inventory
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930152845&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-642-22757-8
DO - 10.1007/978-3-642-22757-8
M3 - Monographs
SN - 978-3-642-22756-1
BT - Deficits in EU and US mandatory environmental information disclosure
PB - Springer
CY - Berlin
ER -