Curriculum and Didaktik in 21st Century: Still Divergent or Converging?

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Curriculum and Didaktik in 21st Century: Still Divergent or Converging? / Tahirsylaj, Armend; Niebert, Kai; Duschl, Richard A.
in: European Journal of Curriculum Studies, Jahrgang 2, Nr. 2, 2015, S. 262-281.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{5ca90244087c481a9fe2b1276cd6bdd3,
title = "Curriculum and Didaktik in 21st Century: Still Divergent or Converging?",
abstract = "An intensive dialogue between US, German and other European scholars on topics of didaktik and curriculum took place during 1990s. Here, we review this dialogue and extend it into current post-2000 conversations to examine how the two education traditions are being affected by global trends in education. We employ content analysis to examine publications that derived from previous curriculum-didaktik dialogue as well as recent education policy documents and education developments in U.S. and Germany, as two core curriculum and didaktik countries respectively. Then, we exemplify the initial state and the identified changes through two logical models, which compare and contrast didaktik and curriculum theory as two educational policy systems. The results point to two key educational changes, namely the introduction of common core educational standards, i.e. national educational standards in the U.S. and introduction of external assessments in Germany. While curriculum and didaktik still hold to their traditional conceptualizations of the field, we conclude that to some extent both traditions are moving towards one another as a result of global education trends such as international assessments and the coordination of teaching and learning around research-based learning trajectories and learning progressions, in math education and science education, respectively.",
keywords = "Didactics of sciences education",
author = "Armend Tahirsylaj and Kai Niebert and Duschl, {Richard A}",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "262--281",
journal = "European Journal of Curriculum Studies",
issn = "2182-7168",
publisher = "European Association of Curriculum Studies",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Curriculum and Didaktik in 21st Century

T2 - Still Divergent or Converging?

AU - Tahirsylaj, Armend

AU - Niebert, Kai

AU - Duschl, Richard A

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - An intensive dialogue between US, German and other European scholars on topics of didaktik and curriculum took place during 1990s. Here, we review this dialogue and extend it into current post-2000 conversations to examine how the two education traditions are being affected by global trends in education. We employ content analysis to examine publications that derived from previous curriculum-didaktik dialogue as well as recent education policy documents and education developments in U.S. and Germany, as two core curriculum and didaktik countries respectively. Then, we exemplify the initial state and the identified changes through two logical models, which compare and contrast didaktik and curriculum theory as two educational policy systems. The results point to two key educational changes, namely the introduction of common core educational standards, i.e. national educational standards in the U.S. and introduction of external assessments in Germany. While curriculum and didaktik still hold to their traditional conceptualizations of the field, we conclude that to some extent both traditions are moving towards one another as a result of global education trends such as international assessments and the coordination of teaching and learning around research-based learning trajectories and learning progressions, in math education and science education, respectively.

AB - An intensive dialogue between US, German and other European scholars on topics of didaktik and curriculum took place during 1990s. Here, we review this dialogue and extend it into current post-2000 conversations to examine how the two education traditions are being affected by global trends in education. We employ content analysis to examine publications that derived from previous curriculum-didaktik dialogue as well as recent education policy documents and education developments in U.S. and Germany, as two core curriculum and didaktik countries respectively. Then, we exemplify the initial state and the identified changes through two logical models, which compare and contrast didaktik and curriculum theory as two educational policy systems. The results point to two key educational changes, namely the introduction of common core educational standards, i.e. national educational standards in the U.S. and introduction of external assessments in Germany. While curriculum and didaktik still hold to their traditional conceptualizations of the field, we conclude that to some extent both traditions are moving towards one another as a result of global education trends such as international assessments and the coordination of teaching and learning around research-based learning trajectories and learning progressions, in math education and science education, respectively.

KW - Didactics of sciences education

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 2

SP - 262

EP - 281

JO - European Journal of Curriculum Studies

JF - European Journal of Curriculum Studies

SN - 2182-7168

IS - 2

ER -